- I decided to write an article about a sensitive topic that is very divisive in society.
- In the past, I have written several articles on this topic, and I will not repeat the information from them; you can find the links at the bottom of the article.
- While in previous articles I focused mainly on the topic of history, now I will talk about this topic mainly from the point of view of philosophy.
- Historically, almost every nation on the planet not influenced by Christianity, which has better-preserved written historical sources, has documented homosexual behavior or homosexual unions incomparably more often than today. Currently, despite telling ourselves that we are tolerant, it cannot be compared to the tolerance that existed in older cultures, in which homosexuality was a very important part of the former culture.
- People also mistakenly imagine our ancestors, the ancient Slavs, to have been 100% heterosexuals who did not know homosexuality. Since only a minimum of written sources have been found from the Slavs, historians cannot express what opinion the Slavs had. Since homosexuality was an important part of culture in the vast majority of nations, it can be assumed that the Slavs were no exception.
- As for tolerance, I am afraid that the trend of increasing tolerance in society slowed down significantly in 2012-2018, and even temporarily worsened due to the enormous success of the hateful disinformation media of Russian government propaganda in those years, when this propaganda was at its historical peak, and various negative astrological-energetic influences contributed to this in those years.
Legislative equality, psychological inequality. Equality in the eyes of the law vs. inequality from the perspective of psychology. Equality for women vs. equality for gays.
We tell ourselves that we are a tolerant society. We have no discrimination against homosexuals in our laws; from the point of view of the law, these people are equal to us, and in many countries, there are homosexual partnerships or marriages. However, we must realize that equality from the point of view of the law is one thing, and equality in our minds is another. The truth is that our society is tolerant – most people do not feel the need to physically attack homosexuals or verbally assault them on the street. So we are tolerant, but in our minds, we do not consider them equal.
If a boy at school is known to be gay, no other boys want to talk to him anymore. In the worst case, bullying. If a colleague at work is gay, colleagues limit communication with him to the absolute minimum necessary for work duties – after all, what would others say.
This psychological inequality is as absurd as the inequality of women. Imagine if all men had the same prejudices against women as they have against homosexuals, if colleagues at work whispered to each other, "what a wonder has come to our work."
Even among the many people who would vote for registered partnerships in a referendum or public opinion poll, they are only tolerant, but they do not perceive sexual minorities as equal.
In Muslim countries, women do not have equality, even from the point of view of the law. Even if Muslim governments were to equalize women, it would still take tens to hundreds of years for people to perceive women as equal in their minds. Well, we are at the same stage with homosexuals here in Europe.
A side note: the tolerance of Western countries. Don't imagine Western European countries as super tolerant. In Western countries, you may not find as much hateful disgust in internet discussions and on social networks, but they are still countries with a strong Christian history, and the energies of the past strongly affect the present. Prejudice against gays is a reality there too.
And especially in France, the Catholic Church still has a powerful position. When French President François Hollande approved same-sex marriage (which later passed into law), a surprisingly large number of demonstrators, 340,000, took to the streets (references: here , here , here ).
And it is an absolutely wrong and incorrect idea to imagine the United States as a tolerant country, which is a country of aggressive, raging Christian sects.
Why do we have such a problem with tolerance and psychological equality?
We forget that the energies of the past have enormous power and also affect the present. Religion, Christianity, the Catholic and Orthodox churches had absolute power over society in the past. In the past, a large number of believers created very strong egregors, energy fields that also affect the present. It is similar with the topic of neo-Nazism. Most people believe that neo-Nazism can never return. However, this threat is real because the energy field, the egregore of German Nazism, also affects the present, which helps it to assert itself better in the present. A very dangerous thing is also to present certain neo-Nazi symbols in a hidden way, as Kotleba did with numbers, thus tuning into the egregore of the past. But I have digressed from the main topic.
The fact that religious egregors have the enormous power to control the entire planet is also proven by the fact that although Japanese culture and religion have no objections to sexuality and porn, porn in Japan is subject to abnormally strict regulations and porn is allowed to be produced only on the condition that intimate parts are blurred. A beautiful example of how the egregore of Christianity influenced the minds of Japanese politicians and even in 2019, Japanese politicians did not have the courage to change it. Similarly, in China, porn is strictly prohibited by criminal law.
People are part of the matrix and have no chance to defend themselves against it. People mistakenly believe that they form their opinions freely, that their opinions are their own, but this is not true. This applies in an absolutely universal sense, not only in connection with prejudices against sexual minorities, but also in how strongly the energies of the past influence us in a negative way. In a general sense, I notice in people how their minds are controlled by egregors, whether they are egregors of religion or egregors of political and other propaganda. People are too dependent on collective egregors and cannot function more individually in terms of energy; they are not able to think freely and form their own opinions. The only way to get out of this matrix is to work on oneself intensively and acquire the ability of astral travel. Then a person becomes free from egregors, collective energy fields, and from what the majority thinks.
Many people don't have the energy to understand that it is possible to function without prejudice.
While the majority society would like to change gays, the majority society should correctly change itself in its view.
I've heard the opinion that the most tolerant country on our planet is Australia, where it's very common to see two men/boys holding hands on the streets of cities. This has a simple explanation. Australia doesn't have a very Christian history, it doesn't have Christian roots, there aren't powerful Christian sects unlike in America, Australia is geographically distant from the Christian European world and from the rest of the world in general. Australia has a much cleaner energy field than Europe, there wasn't such a bloody Christian history, religious wars between Catholics and Protestants, etc. The minds of people in Australia are not as intensely poisoned by the energies of the past, the energies of the darkness of religion as in Europe, which further allows its inhabitants to form a free opinion. The sparse population of Australia is another positive for forming a free opinion; with a sparse population, it's difficult to create egregors, collective energy fields that hinder the freedom of our minds.
In about 500 years, prejudices against sexual minorities will be considered as absurd as the inequality of women is now, and the nations on this planet will have the same relationship to homosexuality in their culture as pre-Christian cultures had in the past. This is already the direction it is heading today, and we see how various groups of people are aggressively trying to resist natural changes.
Population explosion
While in the past a large part of the planet's population lived a homosexual lifestyle, and the society of that time saw nothing unnatural in it, today we have abandoned this culture and are very surprised how it is possible that we have such a big problem with population explosion, not to mention the harsh punishments for gays in African or Arab countries, where the problem with population explosion is the biggest.
If an alien civilization were to visit our planet, they would be very surprised how it is possible that the conception of offspring on our planet is prevented more by artificial means of contraception than by homosexual behavior.
Homosexuality from the perspective of energies
In heterosexual intercourse, there is a very positive flow of energy, which has a very positive effect. It is no different in a homosexual relationship – the energies flow in a different way. I see no reason why a homosexual relationship should be worse than a heterosexual one in terms of energy – both are equally beneficial.
Relationships are more energetically beneficial when a person works intensively on their energy, that is, if they do energy cleansing techniques.
However, a person who is part of a sexual minority finds it energetically demanding mainly due to societal condemnation, meaning going against the matrix, energetically hitting a wall. It can be said that the whole society sends negative energy to you with its energetic radiation of prejudice.
Traditional family. Demographic problem of Western Europe. State support for non-traditional families. Artificial insemination.
These topics also relate to homosexuality, although less directly.
The Vatican and the Catholic Church are very strictly against artificial insemination in any form.
There are several methods of artificial insemination, diluted semen can be applied to the woman's body, or the egg can be fertilized with sperm in a test tube in the laboratory using special devices. The second method allegedly poses certain health risks for the child, but I haven't studied it in more detail.
When is artificial insemination performed? It can be for infertile married couples, lesbian couples, or an individual woman who wants a child without a partner. This is an unconventional form of family, which the Catholic Church strongly protests against. For these options to be possible, it is important that individual governments approve laws to make it possible, so that even an individual mother is financially supported. Supporting diverse forms of family can also solve the demographic problem of Western Europe.
***********************************************************
Wikipedia, with well-sourced information on the topic of marriage in ancient Greece, states that if a man married a woman late, he faced serious penalties. This suggests that homosexuality became so popular among men in ancient Greece that it had a significant impact on the population curve. Similar laws were reportedly in place not only in Sparta but throughout Greece.
The ancient Greek legislators considered marriage to be a matter of public interest. [1] This was particularly the case at Sparta , where the subordination of private interests and personal happiness to the good of the public was strongly encouraged by the laws of the city. One example of the legal importance of marriage can be found in the laws of Lycurgus of Sparta, which required that criminal proceedings be taken against those who married too late (graphe opsigamiou) [2] or unsuitably (graphe kakogamiou), [2] as well as against confirmed bachelors, [3] i.e. against those who did not marry at all (graphe agamiou). [2] These regulations were founded on the generally recognised principle that it was the duty of every citizen to raise up a strong and healthy progeny of legitimate children to the state. [4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_in_ancient_Greece
Forgotten history: The Catholic Church used to perform marriages for homosexuals. A mega-scandal for the church. A terrifying and dreadful truth for conservative Christians https://filozofia.nett.to/krestanstvo/sk/katolicka-cirkev-v-minulosti-vykonavala-sobase-aj-pre-homosexualov-desiva-a-hrozostrasna-pravda-pre-konzervativnych-krestanov
Myths and facts about homosexuality and the "homo-lobby" https://filozofia.nett.to/krestanstvo/sk/myty-a-fakty-o-homosexualite-a-homo-lobby
The correct translation of the Bible confirms the Gospel of Judas. Serious academic evidence https://filozofia.nett.to/krestanstvo/sk/spravny-preklad-biblie-potvrzuje-judasovo-evanjelium
Associate Professor of Theology Martin Prudký points out the bad translations of the Bible on homosexuality. The Catholic Church deliberately and consciously deceives believers. The Old Testament does not contain any mention against homosexuality https://filozofia.nett.to/krestanstvo/sk/docent-teologie-martin-prudky-upozornuje-na-zle-preklady-biblie-o-homosexualite-katolicka-cirkev-cielene-a-vedome-klame-veriacich
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage#History
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_same-sex_marriage
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_LGBT_history
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_in_the_Middle_East#History
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Before_Homosexuality_in_the_Arab%E2%80%90Islamic_World,_1500%E2%80%931800
Same-Sex Unions in Pre-Modern Europe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-Sex_Unions_in_Pre-Modern_Europe
Slovaks are the least tolerant of people from the LGBTI community in the entire EU https://refresher.sk/69573-Slovaci-su-k-ludom-z-LGBTI-komunity-najmenej-tolerantni-z-celej-EU
Fear of otherness is completely irrational, says the father of transgender Gabriel (podcast) https://www.aktuality.sk/clanok/738764/strach-z-inakosti-je-uplne-iracionalny-odkazuje-otec-transrodoveho-gabriela-podcast-e/