The reason why I personally consider alternative media to be something harmful to people and society is that they spread open hatred towards opinion opponents. I personally am in favor of people being mutually tolerant of each other and not hating each other.
What has happened in the alternative media lately is very sad.
To the alternative media and their supporters: It is very sad that we are in a state of societal decline, where people literally seek hatred, and Slobodný vysielač (and other alternative media) fully supports them in this. Shame on you!
The entire alternative media is based solely on hatred. Proof in black and white!
I have managed to clearly and undeniably prove that the entire alternative media is based solely on hatred. Poor Juraj Smatana embarrassed himself when he wrote some nonsense on Facebook. However, the malicious and hateful alternative media did not give him anything for free and turned one stupid marginal comment by Smatana on FB into the biggest media case of the last quarter. We have clear evidence that the most hateful articles and the most hateful propaganda of alternative media have the highest readership. The most comments from debaters in the last quarter or half-year are precisely on the most hateful post of Slobodný vysielač. https://www.facebook.com/SlobodnyVysielac/posts/1462123890540429 The whole case was initiated by a morally very dubious person, Eduard Chmelár, about whom I write more here: Pseudo-analyst Eduard Chmelár: a useful idiot of alternative media and a fraudster. A person with zero ethical credit https://filozofia.nett.to/politika/sk/pseudoanalytik-eduard-chmelar-uzitocny-idiot-alternativnych-medii-a-podvodnik-clovek-s-nulovym-etickym-kreditomPsychologist Peter Marman provokes
On August 26, 2017, a provocative post by controversial psychologist Peter Marman was shared on the Slobodný vysielač (SV) website https://www.facebook.com/SlobodnyVysielac/posts/1431415686944583 https://komentare.sme.sk/c/20633283/podomovy-smejd-s-jadrom.htmlThe aim of Peter Marman's contribution was to slander journalist Peter Schutz with unethically manipulative arguments. Marman is specifically bothered by the last sentence of the article by the journalist from the SME daily.
I ask: do personalities from alternative media really not know how to find any flaws in their opponents when someone argues with the last sentence in an article? Why unnecessarily incite supporters of alternative media to hate Peter Schutz when there is no serious reason to do so? I consider arguing and slandering someone with the last sentence to be absolutely desperate, it is an absolutely intentional and malicious provocation.
Boris Koroni, of course, deliberately shared it on the Slobodný vysielač Facebook page so that aggressive and hateful debaters could vent their anger on Peter Shutz and spit on him properly. This is very far from Christian love. The main thing is that alternative media constantly promote Christianity and Christian values to protect us from Islamization. Are these the "Christian values" of alternative media? The main thing is that Peter Marman openly promotes Christianity in his shows and talks about its great usefulness and contribution to society. He preaches water and drinks wine, and there is no Christian love anywhere.
The Kiska case
In September 2017, Kiska had a huge media scandal involving tax fraud. He began to be sharply criticized not only by alternative but also by mainstream media. Kiska has long been a failed and the least popular politician in Slovakia. Kiska is politically dead, he is a political zero. In the case of a repeated candidacy for president, I estimate he would get 5% of the votes. But alternative media with their hateful campaign against Kiska still do not stop and constantly lead a hateful campaign against Kiska. To me, it seems like, figuratively speaking, kicking a man who has long been lying helplessly on the ground.The entire alternative media is based solely on hatred. The alternative media lives only on hatred.
Boris Koroni incites hatred: he provokes with a 4-year-old article
https://www.facebook.com/SlobodnyVysielac/posts/1433453430074142https://dennikn.sk/blog/lubomir-hudo-nacko-tuzexak-presstitut/
When you haven't been able to slander the other opinion camp for a long time, when you run out of arguments, even an almost 4-year-old article will suffice. To argue with almost historical archival articles? Why not!! In alternative media, anything is possible.
Boris Koroni is no imbecile. He is intelligent enough to realize the consequences of sharing Mr. Benčík's article in such a provocative way. For listeners, it is a very clear impulse to hatred. Crude and offensive comments are piling up one after another. Boris Koroni knows very well that by sharing Mr. Benčík's article, he will greatly irritate the readers of the Slovodný vysielač FB page. Dear Mr. Koroni, why do you irritate the readers of SV with such provocative articles to give them another reason for hatred? You yourself must see in the comments what hateful moods it evokes in people. Why irritate people? Do you still enjoy dividing people against each other?
Alternative media have no serious reason for their hatred of Benčík.
The hatred of alternative media towards Mr. Benčík is enormous, and the hateful propaganda against him is very strong, although alternative media have no serious reason to hate him. Mr. Benčík is currently only dealing with Kotleba's followers, not alternative media as a whole. It is also true that Mr. Benčík has a personal conflict with Tibor Rostas, but he has not published any criticism of other personalities from alternative media in the last 3 years. But when we constantly need to hate someone at all costs, a reason for hatred will always be found. Many supporters of alternative media are very pathetic people.Among alternative media, no one is a more fanatical and radical promoter of Kotleba than Huďo!!! Benčík was right in something when he called Huďo a Nazi in one of his articles. Unfortunately.
The coronavirus is causing hatred against the rainbow march
https://www.facebook.com/SlobodnyVysielac/photos/a.386500414769454.94339.375550989197730/1440241539395331/?type=3Koroni posted a provocative photo of activists who are giving the Rainbow March a very bad name on the Slobodný vysielač Facebook page. The photo is a satire. However, the authenticity of the photo has not been confirmed; it was originally published by an anonymous user on Twitter. It cannot be ruled out that the entire photograph is fake. Nor can it be ruled out that the photograph was taken by homophobic activists to give the Rainbow March a bad name. The most important thing is that the debaters are clear on this: hurray, hurray, we have another reason to hate. There are comments in the context that the entire West is as bad and depraved as that photograph. The photo has become a pretext for hatred towards the entire West. Boris Koroni knows very well that the entire photograph can evoke nothing but hatred, anger, and frustration in people.
Even the London gay community itself doesn't know that someone managed to take such a photo; the main thing is that Slobodný vysielač is slowly better informed about the London Pride march than the British secret service. I can't resist a bit of irony: the intelligence of Slobodný vysielač's listeners is admirable – these geniuses and Einsteins came to the bombastic discovery that a completely insignificant photo is a symbol of all of Western Europe, meaning we have a reason to hate all of Western Europe. There's nothing like the idiocy of alternative media followers – they are the greatest geniuses.