Artists are mostly liberal people by conviction. The minister, on the other hand, is an extreme right-wing "conservative" politician. Therefore, the dissatisfaction of some artists with the minister is partly justified. On the other hand, the truth is not black and white. Not everything that some media outlets criticize the minister for is based on truth. Some media outlets have also spread several hoaxes to the detriment of the minister.
Part of the public has completely forgotten about critical thinking and has forgotten that every piece of information we follow in the media needs to be verified and analyzed.
Arts Support Fund
Logically, a part of the more liberal society is concerned about the minister's reform of the Arts Support Fund, wondering whether projects supporting LGBT people will continue to be funded. This concern is justified. On the other hand, after an extensive critical analysis of conflicting information, I managed to verify that the minister is largely right about corruption in the Arts Support Fund. A closed circle of artists arranges deals for themselves. Stupid projects are approved, and grants for many serious projects are rejected. The head of the Arts Support Fund herself approved a project for her own organization. MP Zora Jaurová from the PS party, who was on the project approval committee, also had a grant approved for her own organization. With the grants for Zora Jaurová, serious doubts arose as to whether the grants she received were effectively used or if a large part of them were simply stolen. Given that Zora Jaurová failed to dispel doubts about suspicions of corruption, she has no right to criticize the minister, as she herself has a lot to answer for.Not everything is black and white – even the far-right politician has shown some success in pointing out corruption.
It is logical that a closed group of artists who profited from corruption and ran on passive income will loudly oppose the minister. It's not so much about cultural wars as it is simply about money, which some corrupt artists are at risk of losing.
It is also tragicomic that in the PS political party, which preaches transparency and the fight against corruption, there is MP Zora Jaurová herself, who is suspected of corruption. We also see the media's double standards on corruption here. When an unpopular politician commits corruption, journalists are able to unleash hell and fuel the case for weeks or months, but when their favorite politician has a corruption scandal, the media is mysteriously silent and boycotts and censors the corruption case, and not a single article is published.
The Matej Drlička case
The minister dismissed Drlička from the post of director of the SND, for which she was criticized in the media for destroying culture and carrying out personnel purges. At first, I also felt sorry for these disagreements between the minister and Drlička, but later I stopped feeling sorry for him when Drlička was caught in several lies and his character was revealed. Drlička claimed that the ministry tried to intimidate him with two security guards, whom he called gorillas. Later, however, it turned out that this was a malicious lie and that they were ordinary ministry employees. Drlička was also caught in a second lie when he lied to the minister that he could not meet with her because he was sick and unable to work. Later it turned out that he was lying and was healthy all the time. Furthermore, information emerged that the real Drlička is not as popular and loved by his subordinates as the media portrayed him – some employees accused him of unfair practices or bullying.I also don't like Drlička's extremely narcissistic personality.
Some media are spreading propaganda that Drlička is irreplaceable in his position and that after his dismissal, the SND will slowly cease to exist.
I also consider it outrageous that the media and part of the opposition are calling for protests against the minister, even though the truth is not black and white and it is in support of an obviously morally dubious liar.
The Alexandra Kusá case
I consider it a total outrage that the supposedly "anti-corruption" PS party and the supposedly "anti-corruption" media organized protests against the minister in support of the corrupt Alexandra Kusej. On the one hand, the same media criticized the corruption of the SMER party, and on the other hand, they support the corruption of Alexandra Kusej. Quite a strange contradiction.And is it really necessary to call for protests because the minister made the right decision and dismissed a corrupt official?
It's absurd how the media is trying to spread propaganda about Kusá's corruption, how they are looking for all possible arguments to diminish the seriousness of this corruption affair. Kusá also did not explain why she extended the contract with her father. She did not explain why she paid her father an incredibly high sum of two million and she did not explain what she actually needs an architect for and why she needs to pay him so much. It is clearly unnecessary fictitious services for the SNG.
And the icing on the cake is that allegedly as many as 18,000 people went to protest in support of this little crown. (Although this number should also be taken with a grain of salt, the number may be significantly overestimated, because hoaxes are spread not only by alternative but also by mainstream media). Here you can see the total loss of critical thinking in people. It is also clear evidence of how easily people can be manipulated.
While the Smer party managed to drive thousands of people into the streets for absurd anti-vax protests, the voters of the current opposition are no better in terms of critical thinking. It's not for nothing that I say that not only alternative but also mainstream media spread a huge number of hoaxes, although each in a different way. One must be critical not only of alternative but also of mainstream media. And we lack critical thinking.
Just because alternative media spread hoaxes, it doesn't mean that their counterparts, the mainstream media, don't spread hoaxes and only tell the truth. Just because alternative media spread propaganda, it doesn't mean that mainstream media don't need to be criticized.
To avoid any misunderstanding, I certainly have nothing against anti-government protests as such, if they are organized on the basis of justified criticism of the government and on the basis of truthful information. On the contrary, I would even like to support such protests. However, I do not consider organizing protests for a corrupt person and a narcissistic convicted liar to be a justified reason for protests.
The current hot days weaken people's cognitive abilities, which makes it easier for the media to manipulate people. When the weather cools down, people's cognitive abilities will also improve, and it will be harder to manipulate them. I explain this phenomenon in more detail in the video podcast, as I intended.
Update: More detailed information has been found regarding the subsidy for Alexandra Kusá's father. Her father, an architect, co-participated in the theatre's reconstruction. The controversial aspect is that Kusá signed contract amendments with her father regarding increased payments for services. This is clearly an example of corruption. More information can be found in the report titled " Disputes over the SNG reconstruction persist: Minister of Culture speaks of conflict of interest, gallery denies wrongdoing ."
The negative impact of media on mental health
Not all media criticism of the current government is true. Many of the current government's problems are extremely exaggerated, and there are also frequent hoaxes against it. The media portrays the current government as Satanists who do nothing but try to destroy the state. I sincerely feel sorry for those people who really believe this propaganda and have been drawn into it, because it has a very bad effect on mental health, causing depression and helplessness. The media or part of the opposition portray the political situation in a much worse light than it really is. Part of the media pumps its readers with hatred, anger, fear, and emotions.The media also forgets to report on the positive news and successes of the government, of which there are also many.
People are so manipulated by anger and emotions against the government that they don't even mind protesting in support of a corrupt person.
And an indicator that part of the opposition and part of the media are doing their job very badly is also the assassination attempt on the Prime Minister.
The media portrays the current government as total Satanists and Šimečka as the savior Jesus Christ. Of course, this is a figurative comparison that captures it very well.
But we must not be naive. There is no ideal government. Where there are people, there are also mistakes. Don't you think that if the PS party were in power, it would be a better government than the current one? Perhaps only seemingly better from the perspective of some media, a government with the participation of the PS party would be better than the current one, because the media would censor all their corruption scandals and other failures. As a person who has information not only from the media but also from other sources that only a few people have, I can confirm that if the PS party were in power, it would have far more corruption scandals than the Smer party, and the media would do everything to censor these scandals.
In the past, as an anti-corruption activist, I sent about 100 pages of materials about Ján Budaj's corruption at the ministry to every media outlet and every newsroom. It was an affair as big and as serious as the Gorilla case, yet the media published only about one percent of it. There's no need to be naive and think that the media will act differently with the PS party if they receive information about corruption scandals from citizens.
While in the SNS party, the ministry secretary claims that the earth is flat, on the other hand, so that the PS party voters are not left out, in the PS party, Michal Wiezik is in charge of ecology for the entire party, and he claims the same nonsense as that the earth is flat. He claims that the greatest evil that foresters do against nature is that they plant trees after the bark beetle calamity, or that we must fight against climate change even at the cost of it destroying us economically.
Major corruption scandals of Michal Šimečka and his family
The Milan Šimečka Family Foundation and its corrupt subsidies. Michal Šimečka caught in a shocking lie.
After the minister pointed out that the Milan Šimečka Foundation receives subsidies from the ministry in an interesting amount, Michal Šimečka and the press department of the PS party lied that the foundation had nothing to do with him. The same lie was repeated by the head of the foundation herself. In the end, however, a scandal broke out that the ultimate beneficial owner and member of the board of directors is also Michal's uncle Peter . I consider it a huge mistake of the media that journalists are silent and did not devote even half a word of criticism that Šimečka was caught in such a shameful and humiliating lie. And where are the critical questions of journalists who would confront Michal about why he lied? If, for example, Peter Pellegrini had been caught in an equally shameful and absurd lie, the media would have done nothing but feed the affair for 3 weeks about how terribly ugly the president lied to defend his corruption. With Šimečka, there is a mysterious silence.The media should rightly operate in such a way that they have the same standard for every politician and not double standards.
The following headline appeared in the media, which later turned out to be an outright lie. " So that you understand, stop embarrassing yourself . I have nothing to do with the Milan Šimečka Foundation, Šimečka tells Šimkovičová."
This is an extremely controversial foundation that, for example, supports illegal migration. There is also great suspicion about the effectiveness of the use of the foundation's funds, i.e. that most of the money is simply stolen.
Šimečka or Zora Jaurová did not call for a protest because they were genuinely concerned about culture, but because of personal ambitions, to protect their financial corrupt interests.
Personally, I am in favor of Šimečka resigning from the post of Deputy Speaker of Parliament, not only because of corruption, but also because of this appalling, easily refutable lie. It's interesting why the media isn't also pushing Šimečka to resign.
While the media fueled the affair of Andrej Danko hitting a traffic light for a whole month and called for his resignation, with Šimečka, the media has a problem writing one article and calling for his resignation. Double standards of the media.
More details on the appalling corruption regarding subsidies for Michal Šimečka's family. More in the TA3 program titled " In Politics: Dismissal of B. Susko and M. Šimečka, Increase in crime in stores, Bombs in schools "
The media's double standards on organizing demonstrations
The media shows two extremes. Sometimes they censor and boycott in every possible way to avoid reporting on the affairs of their favorite politicians, while at other times they have no problem spreading hoaxes against their unpopular politicians, for example, on the topic of nature protection or EIA reform. On the one hand, they organized demonstrations against Šimkovičová, but on the other hand, if the media had not censored the corruption scandals of Ján Budaj, and if they had reported what kind of people, what kind of ultimate scum Ján Budaj surrounded himself with, then the media would not have had to do any campaigns and people would have been driven to the streets on their own and Budaj would have had to resign. Ján Budaj has committed corruption as extensive as the Gorilla case.An ugly corruption affair. Michal Šimečka's mother, uncle, and partner receive subsidies from the state, while his father is a co-owner of Denník N.
And again, the mysterious silence in the media after the outbreak of the affair . The PS party is responding with a marketing strategy to divert attention .Are the aggressive attacks by Martin and Michal Simečka against the government motivated by personal ambitions to secure generous subsidies for the family? Logically, the Simečka family, under the current government, is concerned about losing their passive income, the money they get for doing nothing.
Denník N desperately tried to defend the Šimečka family so that they would not lose influence and readership. For their uncritical sheep, even such poor statements will suffice. They did not convince me.
Corruption affair of the allegedly "anti-corruption" party PS. Ján Hargaš
Although Zoroslava Kollára cannot be perceived as a credible source of information, most of the information will eventually prove to be true. As a long-time anti-corruption activist who has a lot of information that has never been publicized, I can also better assess the truthfulness of the information.The appalling corruption affair of Ján Hargaš is proving to be true. While Ján Hargaš first pointed out a smaller corruption affair of Minister Raši worth hundreds of thousands, Zoroslav Kollár responded by revealing an even larger corruption affair worth millions. Zoroslav also points out that the main motive for disclosing the corruption affair involving Raši was that the minister had previously cancelled a contract for his company, which would make more than just sense.
The fact that Ján Hargaš did not react to this only confirms the truthfulness of Zoroslava's claims.
Monika Tódová and Jaroslav Spišiak are connected to an oligarch named Oszkár Világi.
Everything indicates that Monika Tódová is neither a free nor an independent journalist. She did not respond to Zoroslava's serious accusations, which only confirms that this is true information. If it were lies, Monika would have immediately filed a lawsuit and would certainly have won it.Updated 10.9.2024
The media published Šimečka's dubious tabloid FB status at lightning speed within a few minutes, although such disinformation was not even worth publishing.
What the hell is this supposed to mean? This is no longer funny. The newspapers Aktuality.sk , SME and Denník N, and .týždeň are no longer trying to hide the fact that they are just the press department and PR marketing agency of the Progressive Slovakia party. They no longer even try to pretend that they care about objectivity. They no longer even try to pretend. It is certainly not right that a dubious tabloid propaganda status by Michal Šimečka appeared in these three newspapers and one weekly. Šimečka's tabloid status was spread too actively, even radioactively, just a few minutes after Šimečka published it, and even after main working hours. It gives me a very bad impression, as if part of the media had a highly above-standard coordinated approach with the PS party, as if the media had written an article before Šimečka published the status. Such nonsense was not even worth media attention, but if you want to do propaganda, you have to grab at a straw. I took screenshots at the same time. Other political parties are out of luck – they do not have such a privileged position that the media will publish their statuses within a few minutes and that the media will cover up all their major corruption scandals. Or rather, divert attention from corruption scandals. It is outrageous that precisely the media, which claim that their pillar activity is investigative journalism, do the opposite of their activity and support corruption when they have to defend their favorite politician.And even if it were true that Pavol Gašpar wrote that justification for Tibor, such nonsense wouldn't even be worth media coverage. Pavol, as a former State Secretary of the Ministry of Justice, which also included subsidies, is capable of competently commenting on subsidies. And creating conspiracy theories that Pavol Gašpar tried to intimidate Šimečka is embarrassing. The proposal to recall Šimečka does not contain any information that only SIS possesses. If a scandal were made out of every MP who is helped by a family member, then the media would not write about anything else.
Updated 28.9.2024
Analyst of Ukrainian origin Alexander Duleba, former advisor to ex-Prime Minister Eduard Heger, very objectively assessed the current government.
It's just interesting that the main motive of the assassin Cintula was that Slovakia did not support Ukraine enough, although the opposite is true. And when you turn on the Czech media, you will learn crazy hoaxes completely out of touch with reality, that Slovakia is a harsher dictatorship than Hungary and that the government is against Ukraine and obeys Putin in everything. Finding an article in the Czech media that would even slightly approach reality is a rarity. Czech media is garbage.https://youtu.be/63KWr9odK9s?feature=shared
Subsidies for Marta Šimečková were assessed by Milan Šimečka's close friend Roman Krpelan. Clear evidence of a conflict of interest and corruption.
The owner of the SME daily , Alexej Fulmek, writes the following about Roman Krpelan:"In 2005, he was chosen as deputy editor-in-chief by the then editor-in-chief of SME, Martin M. Šimečka, and after his departure, he was also the deputy editor-in-chief for domestic politics under the leadership of editor-in-chief Matúš Kostolný."
November 15, 2023 Roman Krpelan became the new director of the daily SME.
Another problem is that Denník SME, which presents itself as investigative and anti-corruption, has a new editor-in-chief who is himself involved in a despicable corruption scheme.
Unpopular consolidation of public finances
The opposition always tries to capitalize on painful and unpopular but necessary measures such as the consolidation of public finances, and it doesn't matter which political parties are in the opposition. However, people are easily manipulated and always fall for this propaganda, and the opposition always has the upper hand.People naively think that if Šimečka, Matovič, or Heger were prime minister, there would be no consolidation of public finances. The opposite is true; no matter who the prime minister was, consolidation would happen. The current opposition claims that state expenditures, in particular, need to be reduced. Yes, that can be done. The state can reduce pensions, maternity benefits, and cut the salaries of doctors, nurses, firefighters, and police officers, but these are just as unpopular measures as raising taxes.
Reducing the number of civil servants is also possible, and many politicians talk about it, but it is difficult to implement. Under Matovič and Heger, the government also made a commitment to reduce the number of civil servants by 10%, but it did not succeed. In fact, there was a record increase in the number of state employees. The state and state institutions replaced dismissed employees by illegally employing them through contractors, and a contractor is not considered a full-fledged employee in statistics. This is another way to improve statistics.
People are very naive and stupid to think that if the PS party were in power, it would be able to radically reduce the number of officials. It is very easy for politicians to promise the moon, but it is harder to deliver. I have no doubt that with the PS party, it would end just as badly as with Matovič and Heger.
There are several reasons for the state's high debt. Too reckless spending of money on increasing pensions and social packages for families, the bailout of the gastronomy sector and other business sectors, and energy aid. As the only country in the EU, Slovakia had its energy aid covered in full, so that the average household did not pay more for energy. The problem was also the non-targeted nature of the aid. The generous subsidization of energy for households can partly be understood due to Robert Fico's overly aggressive stance, who tried to gain as many political points as possible from the COVID and energy crises.
The campaign by some media outlets to downplay the corruption subsidy schemes for the Šimečka family
Some media outlets sympathetic to the PS party worked very hard and creatively to downplay, relativize, and minimize the severity of the corruption subsidies as much as possible. The media also used a distraction strategy.The media even propagandistically made Michal Šimečka a martyr, a poor man persecuted by Smer supporters, which further incited the voters of the PS party.
And the proof that the media has very successfully manipulated large masses of people is that several furious conservative Christians, who hated the liberal Šimečka just yesterday, today, when talking to me, referred to him as a martyr who is being wronged and whom the evil Fico is unjustly hurting.
Robert Fico and the entire government coalition are labeled as total demons and satanists through media hoaxes, who do nothing but try to destroy the entire state, so much so that even for conservative Catholic Christians, Šimečka is considered a savior who will save the state.
It is tragicomic that the Catholic conservative daily Postoj, its editor-in-chief and its editors also very resolutely, clearly and repeatedly called Šimečka a martyr who allegedly stole nothing. I am sincerely sorry for these misguided and lost poor people, how they make fools of themselves and how they contradict themselves.
Media such as Denník N, Denník SME, Aktuality and others describe themselves as investigative and anti-corruption, but now with Šimečka, they have turned around and are defending corruption. They somehow contradict themselves. However, people are an easily manipulated and stupid mass that lacks critical thinking and allows itself to be easily manipulated by these media.
While the media tries to hyperbolize the coalition's cases as much as possible, if Michal Šimečka has a corruption case, they suddenly defend his corruption. These are not double standards but double kilometers of media. Some media behave like politicians and political PR marketing agencies of specific political parties.
The fact is that even several government MPs fell for the media propaganda about downplaying and relativizing the corruption schemes of the Šimečka family.
Specifically, media hoaxes that downplayed and relativized Michal Šimečka's serious corruption affairs.
Hoax No. 1.Šimečka's affairs are not serious at all, because corruption schemes also worked under the Smer government.
Facts: Yes, it is true that corruption schemes also worked under the Smer government, but that does not diminish the seriousness of this corruption, and Šimečka should resign. Some corrupt officials remain in office despite changes in government.
Just as an interesting side note, Smer MP Tibor Gašpar admitted the existence of corruption during the Smer government in favor of the Šimečka family and called for it to be investigated.
Hoax No. 2.
This is not corruption, because the PS party has not yet been in power.
Facts: The fact that the PS party has not yet been in power and yet the Šimečka family received subsidies does not diminish the seriousness of the affair and the seriousness of corruption, because despite this, the subsidies were assessed by corrupt officials who acted in favor of the Šimečkas. There is also very strong evidence and indications that the money was simply stolen. And what would the Šimečka family do if the PS party actually came to power? Would Šimečka voluntarily resign from his position? Would he take even more subsidies for his family? Would he completely renounce subsidies for his family? Precisely so that Šimečka does not have to deal with these questions, it would be ideal if he voluntarily resigned not only from the post of Deputy Speaker of Parliament but also from the post of party chairman, because if he were in power, he would be under serious suspicion of conflicts of interest.
And another affair is that the subsidies for Marta Šimečková were assessed by Milan Šimečka's close friend Roman Krpelan, which is clear evidence of a conflict of interest and corruption.
Hoax No. 3.
This is not corruption, because the Smer party itself ordered the dancer, Michal's partner, to dance in Brussels.
Facts: It was not the Smer party, but the Smer party nominee, former minister Lajčák, who ordered it. This fact not only does not diminish the Šimečka affair, but it even compromises his partner, as Smer's money did not stink to her then, and now the Šimečkas have turned 180 degrees and are fighting against Smer very aggressively.
Nevertheless, some mentally retarded, easily manipulated voters of the PS party passionately argued that this was not a case at all.
Hoax No. 4.
This is not a corruption affair, because the subsidy was not received directly by Michal Šimečka, but only by his relatives.
Facts: This argument is also completely off, because in the past, the media has very strictly judged and criticized subsidies for relatives, and these were also nominees of the Smer party. Therefore, let's have the same standard for all politicians. Moreover, this does not change the fact that corruption schemes for subsidies exist, when the money was simply stolen or went to support illegal migration.
Hoax No. 5.
Šimečka's affair is nothing serious, because Smer members steal much more.
Facts: The PS party, in its total desperation, tried to argue that they were at least a little better at stealing than government politicians. They started comparing absurd examples that could not be compared. These concerned subsidies for the families of government politicians. The only problem was that this disinformation campaign did not work out for the PS party at all, and with such absurd hoaxes, at least the somewhat sane voters of the PS party must have realized that something was wrong with the party. I am afraid that they were only a minority. People are very easy to manipulate. The media also spread the hoaxes further. On social networks, I saw several mentally retarded die-hard fans of the PS party who argued about the huge revelation of corruption by government politicians. People have completely lost their critical thinking.
You cannot compare two types of subsidies, where 300 organizations apply for a call and 5 organizations are corruptly selected from it, with subsidies of a completely different type, where you are obliged to receive subsidies by law if you meet the criteria. These are legal and ethical subsidies from the PPA or from the social insurance company. Furthermore, these were subsidies for state institutions such as academic organizations (for example, Svetlana Ficová or Huliak's wife), the Slovak Academy of Sciences. Or subsidies for a municipality, which was headed by a mayor from the Smer party. Only a person with sawdust in their head can still vote for the PS party after such a scandalous and desperate argument, when the PS party desperately tried to downplay the seriousness of corruption. Unfortunately, as far as I know, the PS party failed to find even one example of real corruption, but they found dozens of desperate examples of legal and ethical subsidies.
The extended arm of the PS party, Martina Holečková, also brought up a false affair about Robert Fico regarding a subsidy for a physically disabled person, which even the KDH chairman Majerský called cynical.
MP Holečková (KDH) most aggressively defended Šimečka's corruption. It is absolutely incomprehensible .
And she did not hesitate to use the most insane hateful hoaxes. She cynically abused a physically disabled poor man who does not have two legs and one eye for political struggle.The PS party did not dare to launch such a crazy hate campaign in defense of Šimečka's corruption, so they persuaded Holečková, who was then a KDH MP, to do the dirty work. MP Holečková was such a stupid hen that she let herself be persuaded and abused in this way.
Holečková tried to diminish Šimečka's corruption by claiming at a press conference that Fico's son had also selfishly enriched himself with subsidies worth 10,000 euros. This cannot be compared to the 1.2 million euros that Šimečka's family received over the last three years, but so be it. Later, however, it turned out that this was a very cynical and malicious hoax. Robert Fico's son not only did not receive any subsidies but arranged 100% legal and 100% ethical subsidies for a severely physically disabled person who works as a doorman. Holečková concealed this information at the press conference and claimed that the subsidies were for Fico's son. Fico's son deserves praise for this good deed, for helping a disabled person. Instead, he was criticized.
I also consider it hyenism that not a single criticism was published in the pro-opposition media, that Holečková and the PS party had really gone too far with hoaxes and hatred. Not only did the media not object to this, but they even spread this hoax with great joy as if it were true.
After such a cynical and desperate defense of corruption by Šimečka from the opposition, even a mentally retarded person with an IQ below 50% must realize that the opposition does nothing but spread hatred and hoaxes and is certainly not a better alternative to the current government. Unfortunately, human stupidity knows no bounds, people are easily manipulated, and a significant portion of people will still passionately vote for and defend these scoundrels.
And after such a humiliating blunder, when she allowed herself to be undignifiedly exploited by the PS party, MP Holečková should voluntarily give up her mandate as an MP and crawl through the sewers out of shame.
Update: Journalists are also scoundrels. They portray Holečková as a martyr and an amazing positive heroine who bravely fights against the evil called Fico. But I think that Holečková represents evil and a negative principle for her boorish behavior. The fact that the media makes a positive heroine out of such a condemnable scoundrel, who is as much an outcast as Ľuboš Blaha in spreading hatred, also says something about the credibility of the media, which their readers uncritically and naively believe. Another problem is that Holečková has not apologized to Robert Fico and his family for spreading hateful hoaxes. Huliak apologized, Holečková did not.
Update/addition : I also honestly don't see any difference between Ľuboš Blaha and Martina Holečková. Both are the same kind of boors, with the difference that Holečková is supported by the media in her hate and labeled a heroine, while Blaha is not.
The controversial erotic dance of Michal Šimečka's partner, which strikingly resembles a striptease. A contradiction for the conservative Christian daily Postoj.
Update/addition : photos have appeared where Šimečka's partner, Soňa Ferienčíková, is topless. Link 1 , link 2 , link 3 .A controversial dance by Michal Šimečka's partner, including physical contact with the audience, which strikingly resembles a striptease, has appeared. I had to verify whether it was a hoax by political opponents and I spent a lot of time on it because even for me the dance was controversial. I found out that it was not a hoax.
I have never contradicted myself, and as a liberal person, I don't mind, and it doesn't matter what profession Michal Šimečka's partner has, I don't care if she makes a living from striptease or prostitution.
After such a scandal, Michal Šimečka should voluntarily resign for the good of the party, because this scandal can seriously harm the party. The PS party is also voted for by conservative voters for various reasons, and such an affair will discourage them.
What I consider to be an even greater scandal is the bizarre contradiction of the Catholic conservative daily Postoj, its editor-in-chief and its editors, who, despite this scandal, which must be extremely shocking to every conservative person, consider it perfectly acceptable that Šimečka's partner received subsidies for her dancing and yet they consider Šimečka a martyr.
Dear Mr. Hanus, Krivošík and Magušin, you are completely mistaken and disoriented. As strong conservatives, you passionately defend Šimečka, whose partner performs in a theatre that is not much different from striptease. Her striptease performance can be found under the title "Soňa Ferienčíková/Šimečková, a renowned Slovak artist, dancer". I checked it and it is not a hoax – Šimečka's partner is indeed in the video. You fell for the propaganda of some media outlets that criticized Andrej Danko, who this time quite aptly described her as a "pole dancer". You accuse Robert Fico of the same statement, but he did not make such statements. You fell for the disinformation of some media outlets and are spreading it further. It is also strange that as conservative Christians, you are not bothered by the corruption schemes on the basis of which Šimečka's family received subsidies.
Dear conservatives, why do you stand up for Šimečka and his partner, who does striptease?
I honestly feel sorry for these misguided and lost poor people from the Postoj newspaper, how they are making fools of themselves and how they contradict themselves. They have defecated into their own mouths.
Conflict between Rudolf Huliak and Lucia Plaváková
The conflict began when MP Plaváková did not comply with the rules of procedure and had stickers on her laptop. For a 40-year-old woman to have about 8 stickers on her computer seems a bit childish to me, but so be it. Andrej Danko also provoked more than he should have; it would have been enough if he had accepted that the MP would have her computer hidden under the desk. However, he refused to accept that. The second time, Plaváková was expelled from the chamber by Deputy Speaker of Parliament Tibor Gašpar, who told her she could have her computer under the desk, but the MP refused to accept that for a change.Subsequently, Rudolf Huliak grossly attacked the MP at a press conference and, in addition to homophobic attacks linked to conspiracies, criticized her for overly extreme pro-abortion statements, saying that " the fetus has no right to life " and called her a "bitch". Huliak is a very moody person and sometimes he can express himself politely, but at other times, if he is in a bad mood and has weak moments, he can express himself like a real boor. It should be appreciated that he later apologized for his statements, which is also not common in politics.
MP Plaváková also made a mistake, and she is partly to blame for this confrontation. Her statement in the National Council of the Slovak Republic, and I quote verbatim, "the fetus has no right to life," was indeed made, although it may be partially taken out of context. At first, I thought her statement was a hoax, but the statement is real. However, this does not change the fact that the MP's statement was extremely inappropriate, provocative, and unnecessarily provoked conservatives. In the future, she must be careful not to let her tongue slip, not to misspeak. I personally have liberal views, but I would never unnecessarily provoke conservatives like this. The MP must pay for her mistakes.
In response to Huliak's statements, all opposition parties, led by the PS party, called a press conference. I don't want to diminish the seriousness of Huliak's statements, but this press conference was extremely embarrassing. Only women spoke at the press conference, and it was held in a strongly feminist spirit. Plaváková accused the entire coalition of being against women, of not considering women equal to men. She spoke in a context as if Slovakia were a Muslim country, where women are indeed not considered equal to men. The press conference was so embarrassing that it must have opened the eyes of even a somewhat sane PS voter to the fact that something is wrong with the party. I honestly cannot imagine a more repulsive and primitive presentation of extreme feminism than this press conference.
The extreme feminist Mária Kolíková also gave a fiery speech at the press conference, where she presented an extremely controversial and extremely feminist law to parliament with the strictest definition of rape in the world regarding active consent.
And the icing on the cake at the end. The MP for KDH also spoke at the press conference. It will be very difficult for the KDH party to explain to conservative voters why their MP attended this crazy feminist press conference. And that's not the worst of it. For conservative voters, the worst thing is that by defending Plaváková, the KDH MP indirectly defended her controversial, strongly pro-abortion statements.
Now I will write something outside the main topic. I consider extreme feminists from the PS party to be hurt, insecure, and bitter women with prejudices against men. I can confirm this as a person who is an expert in non-verbal communication. MP Beáta Jurík even admitted that she was raped. I consider such women dangerous in parliament because there is a risk of recycling Kolíková's crazy bill on the definition of rape, which would also illegalize voluntary and healthy sexual intercourse. Bitter women with prejudices against men may feel the need to punish men as much as possible in the law. The same applies to MP Holečková, who left KDH and is known for her feminist themes or feminist provocations, such as in the "King on the Move" show, when she accused Taraba of what he did not do based on inappropriate feminist arguments.
I don't want to diminish the issue of rape in any way, on the one hand, on the other hand, the MPs for the PS party are dangerous in that they would like to punish men as much as possible, which is the opposite extreme and that is not good either.
With the right meditation techniques, a person can heal from such psychological wounds.
Update/addition: several media outlets spread the hoax that Huliak had not apologized for his statements about Plaváková and refused to apologize, which again was just scoundrels of journalists adding fuel to the fire to further divide society.
Conflict between Andrej Danko and the HLAS party
Andrej Danko reproaches the HLAS party for having the same number of ministries as the Smer party. However, this argument is not factual, as the Hlas party has a better negotiating position given that both coalition and opposition political parties are willing to form a government with it.If Andrej Danko continues to be stubborn during this electoral term, the Hlas party can form a government with the PS party.
The conflict between Danko and Hlas escalated during the presidential elections, when Danko supported Pellegrini too late, and even then, Pellegrini had to beg on his knees. Danko only supported Pellegrini after he had to make a painful compromise by repealing the decree on transitions based on the arguments of conspiracies and disinformation from Russian propaganda in alternative media, which are prejudiced and spread hatred against transgender people. It is logical that the Hlas party no longer has the desire or reason to make further compromises for Danko to become the Speaker of Parliament. Danko already owes Hlas enough.
Furthermore, Danko argues that he feels wronged after the presidential elections following Pellegrini's victory. He is probably sorry that Korčok did not win. Danko's behavior is strange when, according to his statements, he perceives Pellegrini or the Hlas party as an even greater opponent and competitor than the opposition political parties.
It can be considered sad and undignified that the communication between Danko and Hlas is quite similar to the Matovič-Sulík style, where coalition partners sent messages through press conferences and spoke ill of each other. Let's hope that such communication will end soon.
Another problem is that Danko and Matovič have a lot in common. Both are narcissists. While Matovič needs attention at press conferences, Danko needs attention in the form of the Speaker of Parliament's chair. I also see an infantile and immature personality in Danko, similar to Matovič. Conflicts in the style of small children in a sandbox hitting each other on the heads with plastic shovels.
Update/addition : One of the reasons why Danko is feverishly eager for the position of Speaker of Parliament is probably that he can seize the government's special plane and misuse it to meet with his beloved Putin. As Deputy Speaker of Parliament, he cannot misuse the government's special plane so easily.
Mystery solved: why did Michal Šimečka promote Michal Wiezik right after he learned about his corruption? Why did he behave so seemingly irrationally?
I mentioned a long time ago, both on Facebook and in my video podcasts, that I communicated with Michal Šimečka via Facebook. We wrote to each other. I sent him evidence of Michal Wiezik's corruption, specifically how his Aevis foundation received money from Budaj's department. This was shortly before the parliamentary elections. Šimečka reacted very strangely to this. Not only did he not expel him from the party, not only did he not hierarchically downgrade his position, but he even did something we would least expect from him. He promoted Wiezik to the position of chief ecologist in the party. Šimečka did not act like an anti-corruption politician but like a pro-corruption politician.Even then, I had a very strong suspicion that Šimečka was involved in some corruption. It was later confirmed.
The psychology of a corrupt person is complex and not so easy to explain in a short time. A corrupt person does not want to feel alone in the party. They need to find someone who will understand them and with whom they will support each other in the event of a corruption scandal.
Even before the elections, Michal Šimečka knew very well what dirty corruption his family was involved in and he knew that it could come to light. That's why he needed to promote a like-minded companion in the party and have him closer to him so that they could support each other psychologically.
The overly aggressive political struggle of the PS party, the opposition, and parts of the media against the current government. Is it madness or money behind it?
Personally, I think it's both. But probably more the money. Behind the frenzy of the opposition and their affiliated media, I sense a huge desire for power, when I see how both the opposition and the media aggressively attack the government, not hesitating to use even the most primitive hoaxes.So, the desire for power. And if, as a politician, you have power, you get to the trough, and on top of that, you have the media on your side, you can steal indefinitely, but corruption cases will be 100% censored and boycotted in the media, as was the case with Budaj's department.
My opinion is that various entrepreneurs who are behind the PS party, who have financially supported it, feel they are its shareholders and are doing everything to get the party into power, even over dead bodies. They are pushing the party to spread an unlimited number of hoaxes against the government. The same entrepreneurs are also contributing to bribing journalists and the media to carry out the most aggressive propaganda possible.
I find it hard to believe that human stupidity alone would be enough to achieve such a crazy state of the opposition and the media. There must be money behind it as well.
(Updated 23.10.2024)
Journalist Ivan Mego criticizes the Čurillovci
Journalist Ivan Mego criticizes the Čurillovci . They were raised by Smer members and it turned against them. He talks about it at the end of the video.Unfortunately, critical thinking is completely alien to 90% of people. The media spreads propaganda. One of the few honest journalists, Ivan Mego, identified the Čurillovci as those who manipulated the investigation.
Mego has long profiled himself with his views as a clear opposition voter, and no one can accuse him of doing any propaganda in favor of the current coalition.
Also, no one can accuse Mega of not understanding criminal law, as he has been dealing with this topic for a long time.
It is very sad how the media divides society on the topic of the Čurilovci into two irreconcilable camps.
The media broke the censorship on Tomáš Hellebrandt's HIV diagnosis for the first time.
The media broke the censorship only after 8 months, when the topic was no longer relevant at all. As a person who sees behind the scenes of the media, the media had this information from the very beginning. But they decided to censor it. If the same thing that happened to Hellebrandt happened to Pellegrini, the media would not only not censor it, but they would even feed this affair for three months, nothing else would be written about for three months. Double standards of the media.The fact that the media is not ashamed of anything in the political struggle is also proven by the fact that the liberal daily N, during the presidential campaign, disparagingly, mockingly, and homophobically ridiculed Peter Pellegrini's homosexual orientation. What about the protection of sensitive health data if it concerns our political enemy? Then all ethics go by the wayside.
It is totally shameful that this information was censored in the mainstream media, but it appeared in alternative media.
Former SIS official Roman Osuský: Jaroslav Spišiak supported the mafia
What is the difference between the PS and SMER parties? None. Both support the mafia. A prominent member of the PS party is Jaroslav Spišiak, who proactively supported the mafia. The general public is artificially divided by media propaganda, which tries to put these parties in complete contrast of good and evil… corrupt vs. anti-corruption fighters.Many thanks to Ivan Mego, who is one of the few honest journalists who truly seek the truth and do not engage in propaganda.
According to an SIS member, former minister Daniel Lipšic, under whom Spišiak worked, was also an important supporter of the mafia.
EXCLUSIVE Former SIS official didn't mince words: I'll tell you how it was with the Sátorovci
He was a member of the Slovak Information Service for more than twenty years. More precisely, from 1994 to 2015. That is, during the period when Ľudovít Sátor and his gang murdered more than 200 people in southern Slovakia. For years he worked in a covert regime, in the environment of organized crime.
https://youtu.be/pXLU7l7CvWQ?si=28AxErQs8vZrctqh
Matúš Vallo devastated Bratislava, claims the former mayor of the old town
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yunv5Jclx_8 Consolidation of public finances by increasing the salaries of clergy or by increasing subsidies for churches
Everyone is tightening their belts, only the church will be better off. Press release of the Ministry of Culture of October 2, 2024. The government approved an amendment to the Act on the Financing of Churches, the clergy will have higher salaries after years https://www.culture.gov.sk/ministerstvo/medialny-servis/aktuality-ministerstva-kultury/vlada-schvalila-novelu-zakona-o-financovani-cirkvi-duchovni-budu-mat-po-rokoch-vyssie-platy/The disgusting Bolshevik Ľ. Blaha is bringing a terrible shame to Slovakia in the European Parliament.
Ľuboš Blaha went to Moscow to praise Putin for the war and the killing of Ukrainians, and he even boasts about it in the European Parliament. What can MEPs think of the Slovak nation?What did Blaha go to Moscow to admire Russia for? For their total economic backwardness and the pandemic of alcoholism? Does Blaha really want to set the backward and decadent Russia as an example for the EU?
https://youtu.be/p_gsg7FVxGY?si=AM1IPE9SIWXXszed
Updated 12/12/2024
Šimon Žďársky mocked Huliak. But Béla Bugár really cooled him down and taught him a lesson.
As a person who sees behind the scenes of media and political games that the general public has never even dreamed of, I can confirm that Béla Bugár's views are the closest to reality. The wise Bugár schooled the stupid Šimon. Perfect training, even in the field of ecology, about cormorants. Again, Šimon fell for the hoaxes of frustrated politicians and journalists who spread hoaxes about cormorants. But Bugár schooled him.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_frfWaUsME
The media's double standards in the car accident of Andrej Danko and Hojsík's assistant
Double standards of the media in the case of Andrej Danko's accident and Hojsík's assistant. In the case of Andrej Danko's accident, the media did not write about anything for a month, while in the case of Hojsík's assistant, there is not nearly as much noise in the media. The duty of the media/journalists is to have the same standards for every politician, not double standards. Hojsík is a mentally ill eco-fascist for the PS party.PS. Update: A certain unnamed politician took a jab at the eco-fascist Hojsík as follows, and hit the nail on the head:
Hojsík, who pretended he didn't have a car and walked everywhere because he was fighting global warming, we know after today that he has a car, he just doesn't have an emissions test . The PS should call on the hypocrite to resign as Vice-President of the European Parliament.
Hojsík's drunk assistant had a breath alcohol level of almost half per mille . He refused to call the police about the accident. However, he failed to do so and the police arrived.
The "savior" of the planet and ecoterrorist Hojsík preaches water and drinks wine. Not only does he refuse to be a role model and use the ecological public transport promoted by ecoterrorists, but he even has a car and his own driver. Hojsík is in favor of banning combustion cars, although his car is a combustion car. Ecoterrorist Hojsík is our "role model" in electric cars. Moreover, his car does not have an emission control.
Updated 8.6.2025
Šimečka subsidieshttps://youtu.be/ufijEKo806Y?si=dt99pokE80ffIEaV
MP Marián Kéry vs. his diploma thesis vs. media propaganda
On the one hand, it is reprehensible that this MP has a forged thesis, but on the other hand, if the same journalists started to scrutinize the theses of politicians and MPs from the PS party, we would probably all be surprised. I would not be surprised if it turned out that every second MP from the PS party had a forged thesis.Double standards in the media are a big problem. They don't look for any dirt on their favorite political parties, but on the contrary, they censor everything negative about them.