Kotleba always had a very positive opinion of Putin, seeing him as a symbol of Slavism, nationalism, and goodness. Kotleba was only awakened by his visit to Syria, where it was explained to him that Putin had calculating, egoistic, and propagandistic goals there.
Good morning Kotleba: if you followed Russian independent media and Russian independent analysts, you would have known long ago that Russia does not have clean intentions in Syria (translations of Russian independent analysts into Czech can be found, for example, on the website http://tapolitika.cz/ ).
All credit to Kotleba and Moor for being humble enough to change their minds.
How is it possible that Slovak journalists cannot explain to people that Putin is a scoundrel, but Kotleba has to explain it to people? How is it possible that Kotleba has more sense than Slovak journalists? Gentlemen journalists, shouldn't you be ashamed of yourselves? Shouldn't you improve foreign news coverage of Russia?
The difference in reporting on Russia by Slovak and Czech media is about as great as the difference between good and evil. Shame on you, Slovak journalists, for sinking so low!
For a better understanding of the difference in the quality of journalism in Slovakia and the Czech Republic, see the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsXo7gt27s0
It is very sad that we Slovaks are such a stupid nation, so naively believing propaganda that the extremist Kotleba has to explain to us not to believe Putin.
The original video from which I cut this. In the show, Kotleba and MP for his party, Ján Mora, talk about their visit to Syria.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Xev9iNc9uA