The media made a huge celebrity out of student Mura. Trump's crazy "peace" plan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsNqYUKkTao

Introduction and presentation of the main topics

In this video podcast, we will also talk about topics such as the well-known student Muro, who addressed the Prime Minister with vulgarisms and of whom the media made a great national hero. And I will also talk about the 28-point peace proposal of the United States and Russia regarding Ukraine.
                  So hello friends. In this podcast, we will talk about current political events, both international and, in particular, domestic. As a person who deals with critical thinking and sees into the behind-the-scenes political and media games, I think I can comment on this competently. So that you can see what is really happening behind the scenes of politics. If you watch my YouTube channel, you certainly have information, perhaps the kind that some secret services have at their disposal, as I really see into these behind-the-scenes games. Also, perhaps towards the end of the video, if there is still enough time and if I fit into that time, I will also talk about the topic of future forecasts. And these forecasts will be – I am 100% sure – completely, completely accurate, which is completely different from some ordinary media analysts. You will get goosebumps if you go back about five years, if this video, this podcast, is about five years old. So I really predicted these things very accurately, what would happen, and I will really talk about what would happen if the opposition were in power, what consequences, what repercussions it would have. But first, I will focus on domestic politics. Furthermore, just as a small, minor interesting fact.

Inspiration by Artificial Intelligence and Criticism of Media Lobbying

So, a small, interesting detail is that I see that Hospodárske noviny itself, greetings to the employees of Hospodárske noviny, a very interesting mystery has occurred: right after I mentioned that I also transcribe these podcasts into text using artificial intelligence, Hospodárske noviny started doing the same. I don't think it's a coincidence. It really started around the same time I mentioned these things, about a month ago I first talked about it. Now they've mysteriously copied it from me. And Denník N also copied from me the fact that I converted texts to speech, to audio format. I first did it in videos, and Denník N copied it from me. And I'm 100% sure that they must have been inspired by me, because I myself sent them such videos, which were sent to the editorial offices themselves, including Denník N. It's just very interesting that they copied this technical solution from me, but they didn't copy a good example from me in terms of objective and balanced reporting, which is what I mainly asked them for. Instead, they really only did PR marketing services for the then super corrupt minister Ján Budaj. But they get money for these corrupt schemes from various non-governmental organizations. And these, please, are not some conspiracies. I really have real and direct evidence for these things. So, it's not talked about in the media at all, but the ecological lobbying of these corrupt groups in the media is very, very strong. Because there is really huge, huge money involved. First, NGOs very corruptly, through corrupt schemes, obtain huge amounts of money from the European Commission, and then these environmental NGOs, which deal with ecology, in turn use this money for lobbying in the field of the Green Deal and other eco-fascist ideologies in the media. And in other articles and videos on these topics, I talk in much more detail, so you can look it up.

Historical parallels (Nazism and the Church) and the criminal past of the Catholic Church

And this video podcast will also be interesting for me in the context that I will test some other and better settings of artificial intelligence, regarding speech-to-text conversion and also the opposite technologies. For example, what you could see, that one video that talks about Nazism, that the Nazis didn't invent anything new, but actually copied exactly what the church did. The Jewish ghettos, the marking of Jews with the yellow star, and such things, all of that was nothing new. It was just the Catholic Church – I mean, sorry – the Nazis, just copied what the church had been doing for centuries. Today, it is true that the Catholic Church has, so to speak, apologized for some crimes, at least in part. It is therefore questionable whether such a one-time apology is sufficient for the enormous crimes that the Catholic Church has committed, and indeed throughout history. Anyone who is a little familiar with history knows that the Catholic Church has really only been accompanied by crimes. It is literally a criminal organization, the Catholic Church, nothing else. One could talk about it for a very long time. It started, for example – and I'm straying a bit from the topic and we'll get to politics – but it started with the extermination of Gnostics and pagans. That's actually how the crimes of the Catholic Church began. And with the complete extermination, the complete genocide of Gnostics and pagans in the Roman Empire. It continued, for example, with the Crusades, which mainly focused on the suffering of the civilian population. And those Crusades also focused on genocide, whether it was the genocide of the Slavs, who were pagans, or the genocide of the Jews, or the genocide of the Arab population – again, but mainly the civilian population, not some military – the genocide of the civilian population in the territory of present-day Palestine, Israel. Of course, it continued with the discrimination of Jews, basically the same thing the Nazis did. It wasn't that different from what the Catholic Church was doing at the time. So, that's how it was.

Differences between lossy and lossless audio formats for artificial intelligence

And I'll go back to the software, regarding speech-to-text, so I'll definitely be monitoring how much I have to correct, how many errors it will have. And the fewer errors there are, the better. It's very interesting that artificial intelligence distinguishes very significantly between lossy and lossless audio formats. But the human ear cannot distinguish what is a lossy and what is a lossless format. On the contrary, artificial intelligence sees huge differences in it. So, a lossless format means that the audio file contains information that a human ear cannot perceive. These can be various special frequencies, too high frequencies, too low frequencies, and other information. And that's why commonly used formats are lossy, so that they take up less data on the disk. And also, if you download a video over the internet, it also contains audio, so that it doesn't take up unnecessary space, so that you can download it over the internet connection as quickly as possible, so that you don't have to pay a lot for data and so on. So there is a solution, which is to create a so-called lossy format, which narrows down a huge amount of information. We, as ordinary people, cannot distinguish it. We don't see any differences there. But the AI works on a completely different principle. It understands human language, and the AI must also understand the meaning that is being said in the speech-to-text conversion. So it works on a completely different principle there. So the error rate is much lower with the lossless format. And also, in the video where I talked about how the Catholic Church was a precursor to Nazism, it used very interesting technologies, quite advanced ones, where you usually need to use some programming. It's not that simple. OK? So I apologize for the slightly longer introduction, but we'll get right to the next topics.

Decline in preferences, Fico and the building of a modern monarchy (financing of the church)

So, what is so significant in Slovak politics is a very significant decline in the preferences of the political parties of the current government coalition. And also a very significant political event is that Robert Fico has been losing himself lately. So, it's not the same Robert Fico we saw just a few months ago. Robert Fico, who tried to behave at least partially rationally. And now we see that rationality is somewhere in the woods, and it's really a very sad sight to see how the political scene is going down the drain. I was really surprised by several statements by Robert Fico, that is, his very aggressive and vulgar way of communicating with those students, when he communicated with those students, some of those statements were really over the line. For example, admiring some dictatorial regimes, that they are better and more efficiently functioning regimes according to him. That it is a more effective way of governing. Personally, I don't think, or rather, I don't identify with Robert Fico in these views, because if we take South Korea and China, South Korea has a far more powerful economy in terms of GDP per capita than China. Personally, he actually greatly admired China there. I think if there was democracy in China, the economy would shoot up like a rocket. In China, so and China would certainly be a much richer country if there wasn't a communist party there, but if there was democracy. That's just my opinion. I wouldn't agree with that. He even admired the monarchy there, Robert Fico even admired how wonderful it was. Maria Theresa, that she raised Joseph II, who was also. Both were very successful and effective rulers. So, he actually admired dictatorial regimes, which I absolutely cannot identify with. But this is very interesting, this is very strange. So, Robert Fico was talking about monarchy there. So, he even admired monarchy. I would really like to dwell on this, because this is something very significant that Robert Fico said. He not only said in words that he admired the monarchy, he is actually building the monarchy in Slovakia. These are not just words, these are also real deeds. And specifically, he is building a monarchy in the form of extreme state funding for the church. These subsidies are absolutely fabulous. Here, the churches really don't know what to do with the money out of sheer abundance. They have such surpluses of money that they really don't know. I have seen several church projects, what charitable projects the Catholic Church does. It does them intentionally inefficiently. And the Catholic Church is really desperate, that they don't even know what to do with the money in those charitable projects, how to squander the money even less efficiently. Simply, the Catholic Church really has such huge amounts of money that it simply doesn't know what to do with it. The Catholic Church receives such huge amounts of money from the state, so that's just an interesting fact. Indeed, the church has practically unlimited power. Practically, Robert Fico behaves like some kind of footstool for the bishops, who, he says, will obey everything that the Conference of Bishops of Slovakia tells him. By the way, it is also a great mystery why the Conference of Bishops of Slovakia has a turnover of up to 2 million euros. Why? That is a great mystery. That is a great mystery, that the episcopal offices themselves are financed from other, separate money. So it has nothing to do with the Conference of Bishops of Slovakia. It's just a few bishops who simply meet for some joint discussions and talk about the church's further course of action. That's practically the entire Conference of Bishops. And why do they need up to 2 million euros for their operation? That's a big mystery. That would be just enough to give some bribes to some politicians or some high-ranking officials who are responsible for the churches. Maybe I can imagine that for something like this, the money, those 2 million euros, would be quite useful. To stuff some banknotes into a pocket, saying, "Please ensure, dear minister, dear high-ranking official at the Ministry of Culture, ensure, regardless of which government is in power, ensure that we always have enough money, that we get as much money as possible from the state, so that there is no separation of church and state." I can imagine that. But this is what Robert Fico really, with his enormous admiration for that monarchy, which truly embodied the immense power of that church, really captured perfectly. Robert Fico really captured it very perfectly.

A liquidationist peace proposal for Ukraine and criticism of the opposition as a greater evil

Furthermore, I was completely shocked by how Robert Fico completely lost it at a press conference. He was actually gloating about the American proposal, a peace proposal from the United States to Ukraine that would be absolutely devastating for Ukraine. Such a peace treaty would be absolutely devastating for Ukraine. It can't even be called a peace treaty. It's simply an absolute mockery, and he was gloating about how perfect it was that Donald Trump had humiliated Ukraine in this way. So that was really very strange. Until now, Robert Fico, at least partially, through his pro-Russian views, tried to rationalize things a little. At least, but now we don't even see that rationalization. For example, Robert Fico said that I don't know, we don't want sanctions because sanctions don't have any effect, so that's why I'm against sanctions, although of course that's a lie. Those sanctions absolutely destroy Russia's economy. But he presented it in this way. Furthermore, and many other things could be listed in this way. Or he says that we need cheap Russian gas, Russian oil. So that's why we don't want to cut ourselves off from Russian oil and gas. So that can at least be partially rationally justified, or I don't know. Or that he somehow justifies Ukraine's capitulation by saying that it's a kind of peace. That he tries to cover up Russian propaganda with something rational, but this was no longer rational. Here he openly gloated at the press conference about how great it was that Donald Trump was humiliating Ukraine in this way with some disadvantageous treaties, so that they would have to surrender as much territory as possible, within the framework of that peace treaty, voluntarily, without a fight, to the Russians. I no longer consider that a good idea. Robert Fico has really lost it. On the other hand, I still think that the current government coalition is a slightly lesser evil compared to the current opposition. And I don't understand the human stupidity that people really don't remember what it was like yesterday, how Igor Matovič governed, or what consequences it could have. I understand that it is a very, very difficult time. People are really having a hard time. But people still don't realize, those voters, that it could be even worse. And if the opposition were here, believe me, dear friends, you would really miss this government. You would really miss this government if the current opposition came to power. So despite such excesses that Robert Fico has been doing lately, it was also a great mystery why Robert Fico dismissed Peter Kmec. And in this way, he also provokes conflicts between coalition partners. I also consider that a very irrational decision. But lately, Robert Fico has somehow lost it. It could also be because, certainly, lately, very influential and powerful black magicians have openly boasted that they are trying to influence Slovak politics. This could also be the result of Robert Fico really acting like a madman lately.

Psychological analysis of opposition leaders (Gröhling)

But on the other hand, let's take Branislav Gröhling, the chairman of the SaS party. And so we can evaluate whether this person is less crazy than Robert Fico. I don't think so. And I'm not even talking about Zuzana Hlávková and MP Holečková. That's pure psychiatry. So really, few people see it. And I am a person who simply has really special abilities. I can literally scan people even from a few-second video. I can completely psychologically assess that person and then later, as if I had known that person for 10 years. So I can completely psychologically assess people from a few-second video. And really, MP Gröhling is a far greater psychopath than Robert Fico. I'm saying that straight up. I think that even if a government were formed there, even if a government with Matovič didn't have to exist, but Branislav Gröhling was there, he would be a second Matovič. And few people realize it. Few people realize it because you've never heard in the media that this person is a psychopath, but he is a psychopath. That person is really psychologically unstable and extremely conflict-prone. Just consider how he treated Richard Sulík, like some dirty rag. He is really an absolute cretin. And also an extremely conflict-prone person. You will really miss Igor Matovič when you see what Gröhling will do. There will also be big conflicts with some coalition partners. So that's just one of my predictions about what will actually happen in the future if such an exotic person were to come to power.

Economic recession vs. consolidation of public finances

So I'm also trying to find some reasons why the electoral preferences of the current government coalition are declining. And it seems that the media's brainwashing really works very well. For example, the consolidation of public finances is associated, or unfortunately, also with very painful things, such as tax increases. And this tax increase is immediately associated with the fact that it is the main reason why there is an economic recession in Slovakia. But the real reason for this economic recession is something completely different, and that is actually the recession of the entire European Union. This is not just a problem for Slovakia. Also, the media literally bombard the information space with a large number of false information, hoaxes. A large number of various corruption scandals later turn out to be just media fabrications and there is no truth to them. But then again, people are a truly endlessly stupid mass that swallows everything the media tells them. Critical thinking does not exist in people. Few people somehow compare information or analyze conflicting information and so on and so forth. So, these things certainly work very well and very effectively. I am also certainly convinced that if we were to conduct a public opinion poll, it would probably also show that the vast majority of people associate the economic recession only with the consolidation, the unpopular consolidation of public finances. But the reality is a little different. It is really mainly the recession of the entire eurozone or the entire European Union.

Hoaxes about the amendment to the Criminal Code and the causes of the increase in petty theft

The media and the opposition also spread various false information and hoaxes about the amendment to the Criminal Code. So, many people could have fallen for this. However, the amendment to the Criminal Code essentially also responded to the so-called Čurilovci. Even the biggest defender of the Čurilovci, who even wrote an entire book with them, who is a very close friend of those Čurilovci policemen, even Marek Vagovič has now admitted that the Čurilovci are criminals. The weight of those arguments is already so strong. He said that they use some technical files. He tries to downplay those technical files in some way, but that is a very serious violation of the law. It's something similar to a bus driver going to work with two per mille of alcohol and actually driving people with two per mille of alcohol. That's about as serious as when a policeman uses a technical file. That would immediately be a criminal offense. Both in the case of that policeman and in the case of that bus driver. This is just so that someone can understand in layman's terms how serious a violation it is. And even Marek Vagovič has admitted this. So, indeed, those Čurilovci were criminals who were just conducting some political trials. Perhaps, I am afraid, if the current opposition came to power, we might even be on the brink of a civil war. I wouldn't be surprised if such trials could actually be resumed. And perhaps even with far greater intensity and aggression. Or perhaps the second option is that the opposition would at least be a little wiser and simply end the political trials. Hey, it's really up to them whether they learn from their mistakes or become even more radical. But, unfortunately, people are easily manipulated and a very stupid mass. So people could have fallen for this propaganda. That it's something terrible, if the Criminal Code was amended. And yet it wasn't true. But probably the biggest problem they were dealing with now was the large number of thefts in shops. But the main reason turned out to be, and later, with a quality and critical analysis of conflicting information, I came to the conclusion that, unfortunately, few people have such critical thinking and few people analyze that information. So the main reason why the number of petty thefts increased in Slovakia is that both the opposition and the media said that, in principle, petty thieves of petty thefts are basically completely unpunished. And therefore, of course, it appealed to many people, that if the media said it and if some opposition politicians said it, then there must be some truth to it. So I'll probably go steal a little something from the store. So this was the main effect, not so much the amendment to the law.

Media and the Concealed Achievements of the Current Government

Furthermore, to be truly objective, not everything this current government does is wrong. It's more or less balanced. What the current government does wrong and what it does right are more or less in equilibrium. So it's not entirely simple, not entirely black and white, that everything is done wrong. One thing is that we have very, very aggressive anti-government media, which could very quickly turn into pro-government media if the right political parties came to power. And people don't even learn about the enormous number of positive things the current government has done. And many, many people don't even realize how much good and how many good and quality reforms the current government has made. And so on. And how many, a great number of successes. Sometimes one perceives it as a complete given, that well, a politician has some success. Highways are being built and similar things. Slovakia is completely under construction and so on. That it's a complete given. It's not a complete given. Because if other parties automatically came to power, there would be big changes. And even things that we consider, even some minor successes, as a given, are not a given. And certainly. So, I would really be here for a very long time if I were to list all the successes of the current government. But there are really a great many of them.

Criticism of the PS campaign and the threat of radical ecological liquidation of industry and infrastructure

Furthermore, the pre-election campaign of the Progressive Slovakia party is certainly working very well. Or rather, the campaign, it's not even so much a pre-election campaign, I would rather call it campaigns. They try to go to pubs, they try to go to regions, this Progressive Slovakia party. They even try to go to the countryside. Now Michal Šimečka has recorded a beautiful video so that there is something to put in front of the cameras, showing how much he cares about the countryside. But I wrote a very, very high-quality post about this, explaining why I don't think it's sincere. Because simply, if they try to present themselves externally as a regional political party, but they themselves do not have regional structures built, then simply here the words and deeds really diverge. And it simply does not correspond to reality at all. And it is really very sad, the human stupidity of those voters. The stupidity of voters really knows no bounds. Voters will swallow all of it, that they are such a wonderful regional political party that cares about the countryside, cares about agriculture, cares about regions. But the deeds are completely different. They don't even have regional political, regional structures built. They don't even have an expert on the topic of agriculture, not a single one. And they also haven't thrown out all those very harsh eco-fascists who absolutely do not hide the fact that they want to destroy agriculture, that agriculture bothers them. Some Michal Wiezik, such a completely radical ecologist. He basically says that the entire, entire agriculture must be radically rebuilt. Of course, we must have some absolutely destructive measures, simply packaging, regulations for those farmers. And so on and so forth. He says that a large part of agricultural land was supposed to go into no-intervention. Michal Wiezik himself advocates this. Such things are also strongly promoted in the European Union, that. it is already a big problem that we import a large amount of food from Brazil, as the European Union. And in this way, we will become even more dependent on food imports from the other side of the planet, when we simply deliberately destroy agriculture. So far, there is talk of about 10%, but those eco-fascists might want to put even more agricultural land under some pretext of ecology into no-intervention. So really, really these are absolute madmen who, who really, if they came to power, just as the current situation is not good. And I realize that it is not good, but even far, far greater problems could arise if open eco-fascists really came to power. If the Progressive Slovakia party came to power, I personally think that the construction of all possible highways would also be suspended. The construction would simply be suspended. It could be under the pretext of some, that we can do it better, we can do it cheaper. But then all sorts of procurements will start completely from scratch. So such things, various procurements take years. And so on and so forth. Furthermore, there are very radical environmentalists who are very bothered by any highway construction. For example, former state secretary Juraj Smatana is, for example, completely, completely against highway construction. He would be, for example, against it because for him, that highway is not environmentally friendly enough, because it is an environmental impact. And you don't think that the Progressive Slovakia party will be any better than Secretary Juraj Smatana. For them, it is simply not environmentally friendly to build. It is an intervention in nature if you build a highway. So the lobbying there will simply be enormous to stop the construction of highways. People think that now it is a matter of course that some highways are being built, that automatically, who knows who else would come to power, that it will continue. It will not continue. The fears there are really enormous, that if the Progressive Slovakia party came to power, then what. They certainly will not care about building anything new in any way, because it is an intervention in nature. And some very hard eco-fascist core, which certainly has a very strong say in that Progressive Slovakia party, will simply do enormous lobbying and enormous pressure to stop everything, everything. People think so. And someone thinks that I am conspiring here or I am scaring people here. But few realize how serious the radicalization in that Progressive Slovakia party is in the field of ecology. These voters are really. We don't have democracy in Slovakia. Here is mediocracy. The media rule us. The media have the greatest power. And when the media completely conceal the very serious radicalization of that Progressive Slovakia party, few realize how very dangerous statements, for example, Michal Wiezik has. Like that most radical person. Or even Martin Hojsík. Some of his statements are really, not that they border on psychiatry, it's really a real psychiatric examination, his various statements, of this most radical wing. So, few people realize that, of course, it's here. Nowadays, people really complain about everything. But people don't really realize that it can be worse. It really can be worse. And few people realize that I'm really not exaggerating. That the radicalization in the field of ecology within that party is really that serious and that bad. This is not some kind of scaremongering. If the Progressive Slovakia party came to power, they would impose some draconian ecological taxes. The entire industry would be liquidated within a few, I dare say, within a few months, or at least within half a year or a year. Because they have to be very green, they have to be very ecological, they have to be more Catholic than the Pope. They have to be more radical in the field of ecology than the European Union itself. They have to be greener than green. And the radicalization there is enormous in the field of ecology. And this, if the media really told the real truth about the Progressive Slovakia party and really started to point out the very crazy statements of the main leading members of the Progressive Slovakia party, such as Hojsík, Wiezik, then people would really wake up.

The double standard of the media and the censorship of corruption in Progressive Slovakia

So, if the PS party were to come to power, people wouldn't even find out about a huge number of corruption scandals. I mean, I can really see into the behind-the-scenes media and political games. And the newsrooms are already in agreement that we will very honestly censor everything, all the corruption scandals of the Progressive Slovakia party. That if we even find out about some corruption scandal, it won't be published. It's just a double standard. That with Smer, we publish everything, all the corruption scandals, even if it turns out that 90% of those corruption scandals were phantasmagorias, they were simply hoaxes. That doesn't matter. We even make up nonsense about Smer, things they didn't do, on the one hand, but on the other hand, with our political party, the Progressive Slovakia party, with which we cooperate, we will very honestly censor everything. That is, we really won't publish anything. And such things are happening. And there has even been a precedent for this. Even when Michal Šimečka, or rather his family, had to face a huge corruption scandal, they even made a martyr out of Michal Šimečka, saying what audacity it was that anyone was even drawing attention to any corruption here. What kind of attacks are these against poor Šimečka, that corruption is being pointed out there. What is this, what are these opposition politicians doing, even daring to point out such things. At that time, when he was being recalled from the post of Deputy Speaker of Parliament, such things were being dealt with. They even made a martyr out of him, as a sufferer, that he was wronged, that his corruption was pointed out. Which I consider completely absurd. And such things can easily be repeated, that some minister completely empties half the ministry, completely steals half the ministry, but the media will still claim that it's just rival politicians, just some Smer party that invented it and is just trying to make a poor, poor, they would probably even be able to make a martyr out of some corrupt minister from the Progressive Slovakia party. The media, that this minister is wronged, that his corruption is pointed out. So, and people also don't even find out, they don't find out at all in the media about huge corruption scandals. And that's, that's really what the media did to Matovič, that simply the media, people are still not informed about the huge corruption scandals of Igor Matovič himself, or his people, his ministers. And most people don't even know about it, what huge thefts. And Igor Matovič was not some extreme darling of the media. And I can't imagine if the Progressive Slovakia party came to power, that people would simply be, those voters would be completely stupid and completely brainwashed. That they wouldn't even find out about huge corruption scandals. And then of course people will, voters will vote for the Progressive Slovakia party again like idiots, because they didn't find out and read in the media that they really had huge corruption scandals there. And it is clearly the most corrupt political party, or it belongs among the most corrupt. Because I can see into those behind-the-scenes games, even before they've even come to power, every other MP is already linked to some corruption. And I, as a person who sees into these behind-the-scenes games, know about these things. But the media really only reports on them very, very little. So, it's very marginal, or some tiny one-off article is written somewhere, an inconspicuous little article.

Media Manipulation and the Uncritical Public

And then the media pretends to have forgotten about it. Human stupidity really knows no bounds. When the biggest scandal of this government is said to be a car accident involving the head of the secret service. This is actually a distraction, that the media doesn't have to write literally hundreds of articles about this topic. They repeatedly focus on it, repeatedly recycle these topics. They focus on it endlessly. What does he dare to do, dare to have a car accident, some head of the secret service. But this, this works on people. Such, such various emotional articles, emotional outbursts. But some real things that are important, the media distracts attention from them. So people are an endlessly stupid mass. People don't realize that the media simply manipulates them. I think completely differently. When I see something in the media, especially such strange campaigns, when literally the media campaigns, when from such a small thing, like a minor car accident, it is made into almost the biggest case in the world. Then this really starts to make my warning light blink a little, when such campaigns are already being done. It has the exact opposite effect on me, that I really think about how the media tries to manipulate people. And I don't think about how I swallow the propaganda of the media, as 99% of people think. This is how they think, that people literally swallow the propaganda of the media, literally swallow it without any critical thinking. And that's why I also try to train in some way, so that you learn critical thinking.

Progressive Slovakia: Ecofascism and the Liquidation of Industry

And also, if the Progressive Slovakia party came to power, I can basically imagine that they would force car manufacturers to produce electric cars, like, literally by force, by law. Because we are green, we have to push electric cars by force, because we are proper green politicians. And these are not some moderate greens. Don't you realize that, don't imagine the Progressive Slovakia party as some decent, moderate environmentalists. These are absolute fascists, eco-fascists. This is really no insult, it's no exaggeration, it's no hyperbole. These are really very, very, very hard radicals, very hard radicals in the field of ecology. They would have no problem even putting a law in parliament that says, let's ban car manufacturers from producing combustion cars, or radically limit them even beyond what the European Union prohibits. And, and force them, like, force, force those car manufacturers to only produce electric cars. Like, the Progressive Slovakia party, there are such madmen there who would be capable of doing something like this with full seriousness, with full seriousness. Like, with absolutely full seriousness. Few people realize that, that such, such problems exist there.

KDH's Position: Cultural Wars Before the Green Deal

And the lobbying, the lobbying in this area will certainly be very strong in the Progressive Slovakia party. Actually, don't think that any KDH party will depend on it. They will also want to stay in power, they will also not want the government to fall. And rather, far more serious arguments, the KDH party, even if it were in government, would put far more energy into some cultural wars than into some green deal. There will be no conflicts in that government because of some green deal, but far greater ones will be rather because of some cultural wars. Rather, because of some registered partnerships, there will be far greater conflicts. And simply, in such matters, even religious fanatics already know how to make some compromise, that even, well, what, we sacrifice industry, we sacrifice even, like, even the automotive industry. That doesn't matter, but mainly, the cultural wars are the first priority. And everything else goes aside. We are even willing to make some compromise in the area of the green deal. This is how the KDH party would certainly think. And so, one should not think that even if the KDH party were somehow able, even if it were in a coalition with Progressive Slovakia, that it would be able to prevent some destruction of some industry. It would not be able to prevent it. And simply, there could even be another economic recession as a result of the liquidation of the automotive industry. Because the Progressive Slovakia party, because really, those, those, those environmentalists in that party are very, very radical.

An Alternative to the Current Government and a Non-Interventionist Regime

So people nowadays complain a lot about the current government, but they don't consider what alternative we have. Whether there really is a better alternative to the current government. I have big doubts. I personally have big doubts whether there is a better alternative to the current government. Also, if the Progressive Slovakia party came to power, it would mean that, I personally think, at least 75% of all national parks would automatically enter a no-intervention regime. Which for the average lay public, that's quite a sexy topic. After all, there should be no intervention in a national park. No logging tractors should be running there. And in the media, there is particularly radical propaganda on this issue. And I would even say that the most radical propaganda of all possible areas is precisely in the field of ecology, in the media. It sounds like a sexy topic, that it's a good thing, that it should be in a no-intervention zone.

No-Intervention Regime: History and Risks of Devastation

But during socialism, much more logging was done, even in national parks. There was 100 times more logging in national parks than today. Even during socialism, when those national parks were established, it was never intended for there to be a non-intervention regime. There was really only a non-intervention regime in maybe 5% or 3% of the national park's territory. Those were the most valuable reserves. And in the rest, logging was simply done normally. It was a normal economic forest. It was never intended, as people don't understand today. And people are fooled by the media and don't understand the ecological context. But it was never intended, even during socialism when those national parks were established, that there would be no logging there. Quite the opposite. It was a normal economic forest. Perhaps logging was done a little more carefully, with more attention to ecology. But in fact, non-intervention can have very unfortunate ecological consequences. Because few people, ordinary laypeople, realize what a non-intervention regime means. You can't even plant a tree in that non-intervention regime. Those eco-fascists, it's completely irrational, but they are, for example, against planting trees. Yes, some bark beetle can even destroy entire areas. But you can't plant a tree in the place where the bark beetle has wreaked havoc, because non-intervention is non-intervention. You can't do anything there. Few people realize this. Also, in fact, it can happen, and such things, very serious decisions can also cause enormous soil degradation. Huge floods can occur, which affects the water retention functions of the forest. When it was put into a no-intervention regime, few people realize the enormous ecological consequences. It seems like, well, no intervention is no intervention. It's supposed to be a national park, it's supposed to be no-intervention. But we can't just take spruce monocultures, which contain very genetically poor individuals, and genetics are extremely important in forestry. You can't just plant any tree anywhere. I think that's even forbidden by law. Forestry has very strict regulations, very strict rules, that you have to plant a tree of very high genetic quality that will resist the bark beetle and resist the wind. You can't just plant anything there, but unfortunately, these national parks often come from non-native tree species in non-native habitats. The spruce cannot be at too low altitudes and so on. And simply, if you leave it to no-intervention, then truly pure, virgin forests that really don't know any human intervention are left to no-intervention. And we don't have a single square meter of such forests in Slovakia. They are just forests with minimal human intervention. Some tiny, small islands. They can be found on about 0.5% of the territory. But it's not like we can put entire national parks into no-intervention in this way. And that's really, like, what appears to be ecology is actually the devastation of nature. We, like, it's very irresponsible, simply irresponsible to give, because that, that commercial forest cannot be put into a non-intervention regime. And if so, then it really has to be, for decades, a very special preparation for nature to be able to cope on its own. There must be really layered, age structures. You have to find a tree that is three years old, up to some 100-year-old trees, you have to find them in that forest. It cannot be that when the old tree falls, the small tree can simply grow there. And for that, you need human intervention. It cannot be without some age stratification. You cannot immediately put such forests into some non-intervention. Because that can have very serious ecological consequences. That ordinary laypeople do not realize this, that they fall for the media, that everything must be, like, 100% of the national park must be non-intervention. Like, that's a very sexy topic. It sounds very nice at first glance. But the reality is a little different. It cannot work like that.

EU Pressure and Expansion of National Parks

But, if the Progressive Slovakia party came to power, this huge devastation of national parks would certainly happen. Definitely. And I am not satisfied with the current government either, because the previous government made it a condition of some recovery plan that there must be some zoning of national parks. And so the European Commission is also very strongly intervening in the zoning of national parks, so that there is as much non-intervention as possible. The current government is also quite significantly pushing for this non-intervention. Because probably the pressure from the European Commission, the pressure from the European Commission on how much non-intervention there must be, is probably quite large and quite significant. That even I, and I personally think that if the Progressive Slovakia party were in power, they would not bother with it at all. They would put even 100% of all national parks into non-intervention. And maybe some other national parks would even be created. If the Progressive Slovakia party were in power, how many more national parks with 100% non-intervention would be created here. We would probably have more national parks than protected landscape areas. I can imagine that. And I am personally convinced of this. That, that we would have far more national parks and far larger areas than protected landscape areas. If the Progressive Slovakia party were in power, they really have no inhibitions. I don't know which state has more, a larger area of national parks than Slovakia. If these people really came to power. But that's not, it's not that good. Nor does it have a good effect on any economy. As long as there are too many national parks, it will be too much. That's A, and B, neither, neither, neither in the field of ecology. It may seem that it is ecological to have many national parks, but in reality it is not ecological. And you can harm nature even more if, for example, the bark beetle overpopulates there, then it is not ecological at all.

Political Extremes in Slovakia and a Comparison with the Czech Republic

I would like to outline another topic. And that is that in Slovakia we do not have any healthy, centrist political parties. Everything, everything is extreme. Everything is extreme. Even the Hlas party pretended to be a centrist party. But as of today, since the amendment to the Constitution, the Hlas party can no longer be called a centrist political party. It is really a political party, I would say, rather far-right. When they approved such a very unfortunate amendment to the Constitution. And even Šutaj Eštok repeatedly boasted several times about how wonderful it is, how we have given it to those stupid liberals who wanted to introduce I don't know what, I don't know how many genders. So we just prevented it. Šutaj Eštok expressed himself in this context several times at press conferences. Really disgusting statements. How really, then what is the difference between the Hlas party and the Republika party. That would be very interesting to me. Because then the Hlas party is created, that is, the difference is actually blurred between these political parties, when, when this politician also has such extremist statements. On the contrary, in the Czech Republic the situation is much better, as far as politics is concerned. There at least one such centrist political party, at least a little healthy political party exists. And that is the ANO party in the Czech Republic. And we see that even, of course, I don't want to belittle the Czechs in any way. Even in Slovakia, human stupidity knows no bounds. What political parties people elect. But even in the Czech Republic, that literally mafias, mafias to give a vote in the Czech Republic. But these are outright mafia parties. That, that coalition SPOLU is pure mafia. That is, behind it is the Bitcoin case. That party, the STAN party, is really pure mafia. An open mafia case, the Dozimetr case. And that someone would literally give a vote to a mafia, to mafia political parties, at the ballot box, as if to some normal centrist political party, like the ANO party. That someone would really prefer the mafia over, over, over Babiš. I really shake my head. I really shake my head at what those media can do, how they can brainwash people. That although, yes, there was some Bitcoin case, but we have to, like, really, the fear of Babiš is so extreme and so great that people would rather give a vote to an open mafia than to Babiš. A great mystery. A great mystery, where, where human stupidity really ends. Where human stupidity ends. And I don't want to, like, allude to Czechs, as the Czech nation. Of course, in Slovakia, the situation is no more cheerful. But, but that is, that is something unbelievable. But it is very sad.

Characteristics of the Smer Party and the Managerial Abilities of Ministers

In Slovakia, we don't have a single healthy, centrist party that doesn't belong to any extreme. Whether it's in the area of literally, literally mafia, open corruption, like, like, for example, the Smer party is, in terms of, in terms of corruption, doing well. Like, really, the Čurilovci investigated and eventually found out that it was all just something the media had made up. A large, large, large majority of those corruption affairs of the Smer party. That they weren't able to imprison anyone from Smer. The Čurilovci couldn't even find an excuse to imprison them. Because it was all just some media bubbles. That's the media image that was created about the Smer party, that it's a corrupt party. On the contrary, the Čurilovci clearly proved, showed that they were actually unable to somehow accuse, accuse some representatives of the Smer party. That it is a very strongly anti-corruption party. But then again, it has other problems, and other disadvantages. The party is extremely pro-Russian. It has literally even neo-Nazi, conservative leanings. So that's another problem. That's really another problem. Like, there are really problems there. Also, a big, big positive of the Smer party is that it has very capable, managerially capable ministers. Like, I really can't imagine if some party like Progressive Slovakia came to power, then those would really be, really ministers who are total, total bunglers, who would mess everything up. That would actually be the exact opposite of the Smer party, in terms of the managerial abilities of those ministers. On the contrary, the Smer party has really good, good, really good and quality managers, those ministers. It's on a completely different level there.

Controversy surrounding Laura Kövesi and the Czech Media

Furthermore, I will return to the current political situation, and that is the prosecutor, prosecutor Laura Kövesi, who expressed herself very critically about Slovakia. But she was essentially on a business trip to Slovakia. And she participated in those negotiations, for example, which she also attended with the president of the police force. The head of the financial administration was also present at those negotiations, and he also spoke to the media about how those negotiations proceeded. He said that the negotiations were absolutely standard, absolutely decent. He did not reproach Slovakia for doing anything wrong. The prosecutor did not reproach Slovakia for anything, saying that everything was completely decent and in order. And then she expressed herself very foolishly to the media, again for Monika Tódová. But again, it must be said that Monika Tódová asked explicitly manipulative and suggestive questions to that prosecutor. And perhaps she also misspoke in some way, as she did not want to misspeak. That rather, rather, rather, that statement by the prosecutor is the result of very bad work, very manipulative work by Monika Tódová rather than by the prosecutor herself. But the Czech media themselves are already digging into Slovakia. And especially those, therefore, of the very controversial, especially those, those newspapers of the very controversial only Lukáčovič as a Czech media owner, who is constantly obsessed with Slovakia and constantly deals more with the problems of Slovakia than with the Czech Republic itself. He is a person who apparently feels some intolerance towards Slovaks.

The Chalk Affair: Hysterical Reaction and Media Propaganda

Furthermore, we had a very interesting affair here, the so-called chalk affair or the so-called chalk revolution. It started to be twisted that it wasn't a velvet revolution, but a chalk revolution. Because it happened just before November 17th. And so, the student Muro wrote some vulgarities on the pavement, actually addressing Robert Fico. And suddenly he became a huge star. Again, his message went viral on social media. And the media also promoted him very significantly. Personally, I won't criticize him, I won't criticize that student in any way. After all, the student ultimately looks like a nice boy. But the big problem is what the media and the opposition did, they made a campaign out of it. And also the media, simply, when they interview this boy, even if the journalist doesn't have to explicitly say that he promotes these vulgarities. He doesn't have to explicitly say that, but most people will clearly understand that if someone interviews this boy, that journalist, then the newspaper clearly approves of those vulgarities. Because you wouldn't interview someone you disagree with. If some neo-Nazi, like Livia wrote, wrote some vulgarities addressing Šimečka on the pavement, then surely Denník N wouldn't interview Livia just because she wrote some vulgarities there. So, it's a double standard for the media. And it's incredible how much this student was discussed in the media and how much journalists themselves promoted him. Otherwise, I think no one would have known that such an incident existed if the media hadn't promoted it. Furthermore, a principal of that school very, very, very hysterically called the police on that boy, or rather, filed a criminal complaint against him, which I consider bizarre. That was also a mistake on the part of that principal. And in the end, it had the exact opposite effect. It gave journalists and the media more reason to make a martyr out of this boy. Although he received a ridiculous fine of 33 euros for it. Just as an interesting fact. So, and likewise, the police are not to blame for the criminal complaint being filed against him. When the police are obliged to react to that criminal complaint. That police officer cannot say, "I won't come because it's a politically sensitive matter. So I simply cannot deal with that criminal complaint." The police officer simply must act. There's no need to blame the police. There was already such propaganda that the police were actually bullying the boy. They are not bullying. The police officer simply must act out of his official duty. That police officer would commit a crime himself if he did not act. So, once a criminal complaint is filed, the police officer simply has to deal with that criminal complaint. So there's no need to blame the police for anything. The media and the opposition themselves were already playing it up, saying how the police were bullying some boy. She didn't bully anyone. So, that's another thing. They also called for those protests, actually on November 17th. It's so bizarre that a protest that pretends to be apolitical has so many politicians speaking at it. And it's actually being turned into an election campaign, even that November 17th. Or rather, some political party rallies. And so, campaigns in this area, that's just a fact. So, I personally wouldn't want to deal with this boy at all. I wouldn't want to criticize him at all. But the problem is the media, which literally makes a celebrity out of this person. They are slowly making him the most famous and most important personality in Slovakia. That's the kind of atmosphere the media is creating. But that's how it is, unfortunately, people are an endlessly stupid mass. People will always believe the media, that they are telling them the truth. And yet it's very, very stupid propaganda. So, imagine if the neo-Nazi Lívia herself wrote some vulgarities about Šimečka, then none of the media would even notice her. And they certainly wouldn't interview her. Let's just say it straight, if we want to have the same standards for everyone, then we would have to make a star out of Lívia as well. But the media didn't make a star out of her, as they did out of the student Muro. It's interesting what kind of double standards we have here. Something doesn't add up for me. But people are an endlessly stupid mass that really swallows everything the media tells them.

About Voters, Haščák, and the Extremism of Slovak Parties

And I also realize that, like, the smartest, the smartest sentence ever said in Slovakia was, were, the words of Jaroslav Haščák, that the voter is shit. And that's what he actually said. It was a private conversation. He was being wiretapped. I also realize that there is, there is really a lot of truth to it. Like, Jaroslav Haščák was really right that there is so much disinformation in the media that those, those voters are really a completely disoriented, disoriented stupid mass that doesn't even know who to vote for. Because, simply, those people don't have, don't have enough information to be able to freely and correctly decide who to vote for. Personally, I think that not a single political party in Slovakia has even met the qualities of the ANO party in the Czech Republic. some basic moral and ethical rules. That, that the political party would not be in any extreme. And all political parties are in some extreme. Whether it's in the area of cultural wars, there are, there are some, some very extremist conservatives here. And so, such a far, far right. That's such a, such a, such an advocacy of some clerical state. These are the political parties we have here. Then we have the extreme left, such as the Progressive Slovakia party, which very aggressively promotes an eco-fascist, eco-fascist ideology. Or, or we have the extreme right again. Extreme right-wing political parties. Or extreme, extremely pro-Russian political parties, which do not hide their open defense of Vladimir Putin. Defending the Russian war, defending the Russian war against Ukraine. Or, or some hatred towards, towards the LGBT minority. And so on and so forth. So, like, all political parties are in some, in such extremes. And here we really don't have one, a single political party that would meet these things. Or here we have some super corrupt political party, like the Democrats for example. And so on. That's like, if the media really, like, came out with the truth. And if the media really came out with the truth about what the Democrats stand for, then, like, the preference for this political party would radically drop to some, to some ridiculous 1%. I'm absolutely sure of that. So, like, but that's how it is, that's, that's also so sad. Like, well, you can see it in some of my other articles and videos, where I also deal with this corruption more. That Michal Kiča, who is probably the most prominent face in the entire political party, this political party. He could very well be a future Minister of the Environment. That wouldn't surprise me at all. And, so, like, well, it's, it's really, like, sad. So, like, so we also have some, so everything, everything is some kind of extreme. Like, extreme right, extreme left, clerical politicians or some super, super corrupt politicians. And now choose who to vote for. Like, like, the ANO party actually really meets those very high criteria of a decent political party. But on the contrary, on the contrary, the same cannot be said about those Slovak political parties. Here there really is no one, there is really no one to vote for in Slovakia. I mean, I'd love to kick all those political parties out to the moon. And really, some new, centrist political parties should emerge here. And really, such extremes should be on the fringes of society.

Dissatisfaction with the Police and Corruption in Nature Protection

Furthermore, another thing is also quite, quite strange. This is perhaps one of the reasons why Robert Fico has been so, so down lately. One of the reasons is that the police purge of the Čurilla group is going extremely slowly and extremely difficultly. And that it's not, it's not really completely right. That the Čurilla group should really be in court and really convicted. Everything is dragging on somehow, slowly. It's not, it's not very good. I personally am not satisfied with the work of the police. I sent a huge, huge amount of material about huge corruption in the field of nature protection to the police. And I don't have any information that the police would kick down the doors and lock up some of these key actors of this corruption for a long time in some prison. I don't have such information. I really don't have such information that anything would really be happening. If I were the Minister of the Interior, the first thing I would do is completely dissolve the entire ÚBOK. I would dissolve the entire police, the entire Presidium of the Police Force, and kick them out for a month. Because the way the Presidium of the Police Force performs its work, it is a pure disaster. It is a pure disaster. What do we have the police for, if they can't even solve one corruption affair to the end? This current government has been in power for two years now. What do we need the police for? What do we need the police for? It's like some branch of opposition political parties, the entire Presidium of the Police Force, like that. Such are the fruits of that work. Simply, what is it for? What is it for? What do we even have it for, when we have absolutely no results? Absolutely none. Here, some Michal Kiča, a great criminal, can openly mock us, decent people, to our faces. Us, anti-corruption activists. That man should have been locked up for 20 years for corruption. And this man, these open criminals, are really running free here and can simply mock us. Or Jaromír Šíbl, a member of the Democrats, also a very important part of the criminal corruption structure in the field of nature protection. Also, that man, what, should have been locked up somewhere in prison a long time ago, this man. Why is that man still running free? So where is the justice? Where is the justice? That really, when some criminals literally mock us, decent people, to our faces. What is the police for? What is the entire Police Presidium for? What is the entire ÚBOK for? What for? To disband it and kick it out somewhere for a month. It is a completely useless institution that we absolutely do not need. We absolutely do not need the entire Police Presidium. What is it for? So I am very dissatisfied with the way Šutaj Eštok is leading it, the entire ministry. It is just, it is really a disaster. The police have absolutely no results. Absolutely none. And these are not just some conjectures. The evidentiary situation there is really very strong. And it is really possible to legally get those people into prison. Really, really legal. There's no problem with that. Those people are really criminals and they should just be in jail. And they have no right to mock us, decent people, to our faces.

Separation of Church and State: Risks and Restitutions

Well, to be objective and balanced, if the Progressive Slovakia party came to power, I would also mention some positive aspects. Perhaps they would succeed in achieving the separation of church and state. Although the church has very strong leverage over politicians. It can very effectively blackmail politicians. For example, the church argues that the separation of church and state cannot happen because some restitutions have not been fully settled. And they could blackmail the politician, saying: "You, if you separate the church from the state against our will, then we, in turn, will, as revenge, file a complaint with some constitutional court, that you cannot agree to the separation of church and state, because of some restitutions." And I can imagine that even some politician from Progressive Slovakia might be afraid of such a thing, so that Slovakia would not have to pay billions to the church. That they would rather postpone the separation of church and state indefinitely. So, that issue is really there. Personally, I would risk it, even some risk of conflict and some such lawsuits in a constitutional court. As long as the Slovak Republic does not actually have to lose a lawsuit, based on a genuinely lost lawsuit, to actually pay billions to that church, then there is no reason to tremble or be afraid of some intimidation by the church with some restitutions and similar nonsense. By the way, just to be objective, these restitutions are not resolved even for ordinary individuals. You, as a person, as a natural person, may not even know that you have I don't know what land that has not yet been settled, as far as restitution proceedings are concerned. This also applies to ordinary people, that after the fall of communism, the land is not returned to the original owner. Such problems are quite large, significant and extensive, and there are really many such plots of land. These can be forest plots, agricultural plots, and so on. But it is really questionable whether, if the Progressive Slovakia party were with KDH, the KDH party would agree with the separation of church and state. That is very, very questionable. Whether this political party, which is very strongly connected to radical clerical politicians, is very strongly connected to the church, whether it would simply agree with it. The lobbying would certainly be very strong. It is hard to say whether it would even pass through this political party. I have quite reasonable doubts about that. And not to mention the managerial skills of those ministers, politicians and ministers for the Progressive Slovakia party, future ministers. Because the managerial skills of these people are quite miserable. Yes, a few capable people can be found there, but I don't really think much of the others. I don't really have a high opinion of the vast majority of them. That is a really huge mistake and a big mistake that can be attributed to the current government. It is, for example, the perhaps pro-Russian stance. Yes.

🛑 Constitutional Amendment: Regressive Extremism and Ban on Transitions

And the second thing, the second, perhaps even more serious failure, or perhaps the same failure as the pro-Russian stance, is precisely that amendment to the constitution. To be honest, everyone was counting on that amendment to the constitution simply not passing. After all, those were such absurd things written in that amendment to the constitution that simply no one believed it would pass. It was designed precisely to impress some populist, conservative voters, and then: "Sorry, we were one vote short. We tried to do something for you, conservative voters, but it didn't work out by one or two votes during that vote." It was more like that kind of sentiment. And we actually see that it is so. This amendment to the constitution is really very backward. The ban on transitions is truly a great extreme. The amendment to the constitution clearly implies a ban on these transitions. In practice, this means that we are really going back 100 years, to when these transitions did not yet exist. Even under socialism, when no one made a big deal out of trans people and their transitions, no one made such a disgusting policy out of it as is done today, even under socialism, these transitions existed. And back then, no one cared. No one made any policy out of it. Simply transitions here, transitions there. And now, when we have far more scientific knowledge about this issue, about transitions and everything related to it in the field of psychology, psychiatry, and so on, we are still going to just put it in reverse. So it seems really sick and completely nonsensical to me. As if we really wanted to go back 100 years into the past. That's a really huge extreme.

Conflict Between the Law and the Constitution

And indeed, some official, who is actually responsible, for example, at the registry office for a name change or even for a gender change, that official is now in a huge dilemma because there is a conflict between the law and the constitution. The constitution is superior to the law, but the constitution very clearly states that transitions are simply prohibited. Transitions simply do not exist. So that's a big problem. Even that official is now in a dilemma as to whether to follow the constitution or the law, which are in conflict with each other. So personally, I think that it cannot be interpreted in any way, it certainly cannot be interpreted in two ways. It is clearly written in that constitution that transitions are simply prohibited, period. There is no room for maneuver there.

Slovakia Worse Than Russia? Hateful Content of the Amendment

And personally, I think we are probably the only country in Europe. Perhaps not even in some dictatorial regimes, like in Russia, there is such an absurd content of the amendment to the constitution as Slovakia has. It's completely absurd. It's something unbelievable what it contains, that the constitution would have such a hateful content, so hatefully directed against LGBT people. So when it explicitly states that same-sex couples simply cannot adopt children. You won't find anything like that in the constitution anywhere in Russia, that the constitution would be so explicitly focused on hatred towards LGBT people. So in some parameters, we have literally fallen below the level of Russia. Or there are things that I could still understand, that someone might not like LGBT people, but to go to such an extreme and explicitly write in the constitution that LGBT people are inferior to heterosexual people. And that clearly, although it is not written directly in the constitution, it clearly follows from it. That's a big bizarre thing.

Double Meter and Return to the 40s

So then, if we have such double standards for LGBT people and for heterosexual people, then in that case we can also write into the constitution that Roma are inferior to the white population of Slovakia and have fewer rights in such areas. We can really write something like that. If someone says that this amendment to the constitution is fine, then we can write it in this way. It really seems to me, or imagine if we wrote into the constitution that Christians are forbidden to adopt children. Imagine if something like that was written. Or Catholic Christians are simply forbidden to adopt children. If we put something like that into the constitution. Whether those Catholic Christians would be satisfied. So I understand that some people who believe some propaganda may not like LGBT people, they may not like them very much, but to explicitly give such hatred to these people, to send a message through the constitution that we consider you inferior. I really don't like that. It really seems to me that we have really returned to the 1940s, when Nazism, German Nazism, swept through Europe. So something similar seems to me here, that although Jews are no longer the object of that hatred, LGBT people are the object of hatred. But in principle, the principle is still the same, that perhaps a softer version of neo-Nazism is really returning to us. And I really see it as if we have mirrored back several decades, or to the 1940s, when Nazism swept through Europe. So I really see something very similar to what is happening today. That we have returned to the past.

KDH criticism: Actions and a proposal for Registered Partnerships are missing

Otherwise, if the KDH party tries to pretend that it does not feel any hatred towards LGBT people, it should not express itself in words, but also in deeds. For example, the KDH party can easily submit a proposal for registered partnerships to the parliament. For example, if we were to, if at least the KDH party tried to pretend that, well, we'll take something from these LGBT people and give them something back, then it could at least be said that they don't have to have explicit hatred towards these LGBT people, but it can't be said like this. For example, even about registered partnerships, it is actually a conservative Christian value. Because even a registered partnership forces one to somehow limit sexuality, limit partners or their number, and so on. So it is actually a conservative value that approaches the conservative Christian Catholic ideal. So there would be no problem, there should be no problem with a registered partnership for the KDH party. But they have such great hatred towards these LGBT people that they don't even think of submitting such a proposal to the parliament, not even such a small one. They don't even think of it. There was even some discussion or consideration that at least some small crumbs could be adopted for LGBT people regarding their rights, to allow them, for example, access to the partner's medical information or some inheritance, also regarding inheritance, to resolve inheritance. But even such a proposal was not submitted to the parliament by the KDH party. I don't know if the Civil Code is being amended now, if at least such things will be addressed there, regarding inheritance and regarding access to medical information. Maybe it will be addressed there, but in any case, it's not very praiseworthy. The KDH party doesn't really have any actions. The actions of the KDH party certainly don't correspond to the fact that this political party could be called explicitly hateful. So this is very strange. It's very strange how these politicians are in such a hurry when it comes to various cultural wars, towards restricting rights, but that they wouldn't even discuss such ridiculous crumbs as inheritance and access to medical information. I don't even see that, that such ridiculous crumbs would be discussed. So that's quite strange.

💰 Expert Discussion on Russian Assets: Liquidity vs. Assets

And furthermore, there is a very intense discussion about the freezing of Russian assets, or whether these frozen Russian assets should be given to Ukraine. I think this topic was discussed at the very beginning of the war. It was discussed whether these frozen Russian assets could be used for Ukraine in some way. In reality, it is a very complex professional issue. And that is precisely why politicians are so divided in this area. Even at the level of the European Union, because this is a very complex professional issue. And a very small number of experts are dedicated to this topic. Perhaps we also have experts in this area in Slovakia, but only one person in the field of banking, one employee in the field of commercial banks, and perhaps one or two employees in the field of the National Bank of Slovakia. These are all the experts in this field. These are the only people who were not even given space in the media to comment on this topic, experts, because these are already very advanced matters. And as for me, I have very strange synchronicities in my life, so I know a little more about these topics. Because from this small handful of experts, of whom there are perhaps 20 in Slovakia, I have some contact with one of these people. And the issue is at a completely different level, a completely different level than it is presented. First of all, it is not about any assets. Assets are always some property, some real value, some real property, some real share, some bond or whatever it is. That is simply an asset, but it is not an asset, it is not bank liquidity, which is something completely different. And here we are really talking about what is called in the media as some assets, but in reality, it is bank liquidity. So the issue is at a completely different level. There are no legal disputes with Russia. There are none at all. The whole issue is at a completely different level. It does not concern, it does not concern the fact that we, that the European Union stole something, stole and then used, stole from Russia and then used in Ukraine. Liquidity, bank liquidity, is about something completely different. This is absolutely not related to this issue.

Printing Banknotes as Aid to Ukraine

In principle, if those frozen Russian assets were used for Ukraine, it would essentially mean simply printing banknotes. We can call it that in a very layman's way of expressing it. Simply put, banknotes would be printed and given to Ukraine so that the state could finance itself. So that Ukraine could defend itself in some way. This is what it would mean in practice. But you don't even need to freeze those Russian assets for that. In principle, even a European Central Bank or even the National Bank of Slovakia is technically capable of doing this, literally printing an unlimited amount of banknotes for Ukraine. That option exists. It would probably be quite controversial from a legal point of view. A state cannot just decide to print banknotes. There is a special procedure for that. Perhaps it would be a little easier for the Czech Republic. Perhaps Czech crowns could be printed more easily. Or in the eurozone, it seems to me that there are some restrictions regarding the law. It would not be legal, but it could be done, purely technically. Because, yes, the European Central Bank, for example, has such options, or in practice, it would be simpler through one of the eurozone states; it would have no problem literally printing those banknotes.

Bank Liquidity and Technical Money

And if those sanctions were to end, then again, it's actually very difficult to even define what bank liquidity is. It's a very specialized, complex concept. Few people understand it. It's really a topic for an entire lecture. It's a very complex thing. So, in reality, banks have 10 times more money than the ordinary deposits of ordinary people. But most of that money, 90% of it, is actually used outside of circulation. It's essentially out of circulation. This means that this money doesn't affect inflation because it's out of circulation. It's not being used. In fact, this money is even referred to as some kind of technical money, which isn't really money because it doesn't affect inflation. It's not in circulation. So, it's not really talked about. It's very relative whether you can call it money or not. For the bank to function technically, it must have more money out of circulation than the value of deposits, because otherwise, there would be very unpleasant and severe disruptions in the banking sector. Even some ordinary services that you take for granted simply wouldn't work. So, from a purely technical point of view, it has to work this way. The bank can very flexibly increase or decrease the volume of money that is in circulation and out of circulation at any time. It can work with it very flexibly, and thanks to that, there aren't the same problems with inflation with regular currencies as there are with cryptocurrencies. Cryptocurrencies have huge volatility. You don't have a problem; in a week, a cryptocurrency can lose or gain 10% of its value. And because those cryptocurrencies are simply nonsense and stupidity. They simply cannot be used as a common currency. That's just nonsense, but the banking sectors are much more professional. There, the money that is in circulation and that is out of circulation can be moved very flexibly. And thus, there is no huge volatility, because with the high volatility of these cryptocurrencies, you cannot function economically. It's simply not possible. In that way, the economy would simply collapse. So this is a big advantage.

Symbolic Meaning of Freezing Assets

So, it's what's called technical money, which is already frozen. Russian banks can't use euros for payments. It's simply blocked. The money is already frozen. These are the so-called frozen assets, as they call them. In reality, they are not assets, but okay. So, if those sanctions were to end, then those banks would practically have no use for those frozen assets, because you can increase liquidity with literally one click of a central bank employee. It's a process that takes just a few minutes. It's a few clicks in a graphical interface. Someone clicks something there and simply sends unlimited liquidity to those Russian banks again. So, in principle, it has no meaning. It has absolutely no meaning to freeze those Russian assets. It's an absolutely nonsensical thing, which perhaps only has some moral or symbolic meaning, that yes, in quotation marks, we can present outwardly that we stole something from the Russians and gave it to the Ukrainians. Perhaps it would only have a psychological-social meaning, but in reality, it has no meaning, because if those sanctions against Russia were to end, then in principle, nothing changes for Russia. So, it actually gets access to unlimited liquidity. This liquidity is essentially treated as an unlimited amount of money that is outside of circulation. So, it doesn't have any impact on inflation, but that's how it really works. It's really more of a technical matter, which perhaps only has a psychological effect. It really has nothing to do with any assets, but it's purely related to some technicalities. The fact that the liquidity is frozen is already more than enough for very effective sanctions against Russia. And in principle, it is not possible to punish Russia more than by such a freeze. At most, Ukraine can get access to such money in a symbolic way, that the money is simply printed and literally printed and given to Ukraine. But this is already a violation of some economic rules. It is not even a violation of a certain practice established in banking. Yes, banknotes can be printed by force, purely technically it is possible. Maybe even some state. Ukraine could also be helped in this way. It is certainly possible. But it is really quite controversial from the legal point of view. Because even the Slovak law explicitly states that Slovakia, as a state, is simply directly forbidden to print banknotes. It cannot do it directly. Neither can the European Central Bank. I don't know, it probably also has some legislative restrictions in these matters. It cannot do just anything either.

Ukraine's Options for Gaining Liquidity

As for Ukraine, it would be much easier for Ukraine to get the money. For example, it has no problem getting euros or dollars. Ukraine as such. There are rules that make it possible. It is a very non-standard and speculative thing. But it should not lead to any diplomatic dispute. It is possible to get liquidity, whether in euros or dollars. It is possible to get to it and more or less to unlimited resources. In this area, it cannot be limited in any way. And it cannot be prevented in any way. If Ukraine really wanted to literally print an unlimited amount of euros or dollars in electronic form, it would not be a problem. It is not a problem. You just have to say it. The European Union or the United States would have to impose some special sanctions on Ukraine to prevent it. Perhaps it would be a violation of some unwritten or perhaps even written rules, but it should not lead to any diplomatic disputes. So, if the European Union is not able to help Ukraine in any way, then Ukraine is able to help itself in some way. But everything depends on how clever and capable people are in the right places at the Ministry of Finance, at the central bank of Ukraine, and so on. It certainly depends on the abilities and knowledge of those people in the right places.

🇺🇸 Mirror Similarity: Slovakia and the United States

And it's very interesting how much Slovakia and the United States have in common. I would even say that the situation is very similar, as if in a mirror. Just like in Slovakia, the opposition in the United States is problematic, quite significantly problematic. On the one hand, yes, if the Democrats were to come to power, they would conduct foreign policy far better than Donald Trump does. On the one hand. And the same applies exactly to Slovakia, that if the Slovak opposition were to come to power, they would certainly conduct international politics far better and would not make it extremely pro-Russian. And so on. So there it would certainly be very positive in terms of international politics, but in terms of domestic policy, Donald Trump does that policy far, far better. Of course, Donald Trump is a big disaster for the United States, but the Democrats would probably be an even bigger disaster. This political party is an even bigger problem. So we see exactly the same thing in Slovakia, that it's very similar, as if in a mirror. Just as Donald Trump is heading towards the extreme right, our current Slovak government is also heading towards the extreme right. I'm just saying, who is the lesser evil here now? The extreme right or the extreme left? Who is the lesser evil here now, if they were to come to power? As I have already listed several of those problems.

The Danger of Media Support for Progressive Slovakia

Not to mention, although I've mentioned it many times, it needs to be repeated because it's a very important thing. The media would like to help the Progressive Slovakia party so extremely that it would ruin this political party. This political party is already being ruined by the fact that the media is helping it. I don't see any self-reflection there, no internal catharsis. I really, really keep my fingers crossed for this political party, Progressive Slovakia. I really hope it goes through some internal conversion, internal catharsis, internal purification. And that it gets rid of all the bad things. After all, the political party wouldn't be bad if it got rid of the bad things. But they don't really want to. I really don't see any self-reflection there. They just try to appear outwardly as some regional political party that is also interested in agriculture and the countryside. That's just how they pretend to act like actors. But when it comes to actions, nothing. They don't do anything for it. So something very similar is happening elsewhere too.

Corruption and Impunity

And now imagine how that can actually spoil some minister when the media sees that they are deliberately censoring all his corruption affairs or even trying to make a martyr out of him, that someone has brought up some corruption affair against him. So the media will even defend the minister's corruption, because they don't want their favorite political party to have their preferences reduced. So the minister will sense that very quickly. So "now, media, I've stolen 20 million here for my company, so now I can steal 100 million euros in the future. Nothing will happen. After all, I stole 20 million and the media was silent and maybe even made a martyr out of me, that I was wronged, that I stole here and no, the media even claims that I was wronged. They even make a martyr out of me. I'll steal 200 million in the future" and so on. So few people realize what a huge threat, what a huge danger this is. And we see the same with the Democrats party, who also became very famous for huge corruption, huge inefficiency. The debt of the United States also just skyrocketed. Although in part this debt was justified due to some covid, but in part, similar to Slovakia, the money may have been thrown around, including very significant corruption. By the way, this is also really laughable, that as we all know, more was stolen under Matovič than under Smer. And we don't see anyone being actually brought before the police or before a court. And especially during those really wild COVID years, when money was really being thrown around very dubiously, and money was being sent to all sorts of friends in ministries, and we know nothing about it. No one is being investigated for it. What do we even have the whole police force for if they can't even get any results in the highest places? Although we know, I am 100% convinced that much more was stolen under Matovič. At least at the Ministry of the Environment, I can guarantee 100% that terrible things were happening in the area of corruption. And that's not to mention some other ministries. For example, at the Ministry of Health and so on.

Cultural Wars and Historical Parallels with the Catholic Church

And furthermore, I would like to return to the amendment to the constitution, or rather to the issue of cultural wars. It seems very interesting to me how history repeats itself in Slovakia. And not only in Slovakia, but perhaps in all of Europe, I would say that when Nazism actually originated, it originated on the basis of Christianity, on the basis of the Catholic Church. The whole of Nazism was built on it. The basic pillars and indeed the foundation of Nazism really stood on the Catholic Church, which persecuted Jews throughout its history. So, in a very similar way, ghettos were created, marked with a yellow star or a yellow circle. All of this, simply, the restriction of many rights of those Jews, that they could not do business in some way and so on and so forth. There were really quite a lot of these things. This is chillingly similar to what commonly happened in the Middle Ages, the modern era. So, under those ecclesiastical monarchies, especially where the church had more power in those areas, the Nazis copied it so chillingly. Of course, then it was very easy for Jozef Tiso, as a priest of the Catholic Church, to cooperate with those Nazis, or for Catholic Ustaše to cooperate very easily with the Catholic Church, with the Nazis. They cooperated very well with the Nazis. And that was also because at that time the Catholic Church had not yet gone through the Second Vatican Council. The Second Vatican Council probably arose for that reason, because one of the central themes was reconciliation with the Jews, into that Second Vatican Council. The Second Vatican Council was very progressive in this regard.

The Second Vatican Council and the Sense of Guilt

Perhaps some Catholic priests and bishops have also realized the feeling of guilt, that the Catholic Church also contributed very significantly and substantially, participated in Nazism, and that all of Nazism actually grew out of the Catholic Church. So, perhaps they realized this feeling of guilt. They realized some self-reflection, and thanks to that, a very significant reconciliation also occurred between the Catholic Church and the Jews. And yet, John Paul II also apologized for some injustices. For the first time in its history, the Catholic Church, under John Paul II, officially apologized to the Jews and so on. Perhaps, in part, I don't know if Catholic bishops have also recently apologized in some way for some bad things the church has done. Who knows if those bishops voluntarily undertook such a thing or if it was rather some initiative of the Pope from the Vatican. Perhaps the younger bishop, the one from Trstená, was more involved in this matter than some of the older bishops, who are very reluctant to admit any mistakes in the Catholic Church. But it is also quite questionable whether the crimes of the Catholic Church were so extreme, so great, of such a scale, that such a one-time apology is simply not enough. Ideally, the Catholic Church would require such an apology at every single liturgy, at every single mass, to apologize for its own crimes in this way. Perhaps if we consider the war between Catholics and Protestants, which was probably the biggest military conflict in the history of the planet. This military conflict, which lasted perhaps some 80 years with some breaks. So these were quite decent massacres based on religion.

The Church as an Instrument of Oppression and a Breeding Ground for Neo-Nazism

And actually, to finish, we see that the Catholic Church also functions this way, that even in the past, decades ago, in the 1930s and 1940s, when Nazism swept through Europe, German Nazism, it was actually based on the Catholic Church, or the Catholic Church was used as fertile ground for Nazism. This hateful ideology grew out of Nazism. And now we see that history is repeating itself. Now we actually see these disgusting aggressive cultural wars, and the church is up to its ears in it. We also see these cultural wars, like the amendment to the constitution. Every cloud has a silver lining. Even this amendment to the constitution is good for something, that it may have opened the eyes of at least some people to the fact that the Catholic Church is not some symbol of something good, it is not a symbol of some ethics, it is not a symbol of good, but it is a symbol of oppression, something negative. That it may have opened the eyes of many people. I also realize that although these are difficult trials, perhaps some black magicians were very intensely involved in getting such laws passed. The indications are very strong that this happened, but that doesn't matter. We can learn from all evil and learn something good from it. What is the Catholic Church actually? That it is something very dark, it is something very negative. As I said in previous videos, the Catholic Church has not come to terms with its history to this day. To this day, the Catholic Church actually functions as some kind of dictatorship, a monarchy, where the faithful are taught only one thing. To shut up and toe the line. Not to express any disagreement, not to engage in any activism within the church, no activism in favor of any reforms, and so on and so forth. So it's a very, very strong slave system. And we see that even now, the Catholic Church is used as a tool to condemn people. Especially, it's no longer Nazism, it's neo-Nazism. While it's true that hatred towards Jews is not spreading across Europe now, that's certainly not the case. But what is certainly spreading today is hatred towards LGBT people. The principle is essentially the same. Only who we hate has changed a bit. Or who we focus that hatred on. Again, only such things have changed a bit. And we also see that the Catholic Church has a share in this situation. It is very strong. In principle, when the word "Catholic" is said today, you imagine a person who really sees the whole meaning of the Catholic faith only in hatred towards LGBT people. In principle, the entire Catholic Church has been reduced to only such topics. And we don't see anything else that the Catholic Church would do differently. The entire church has really been reduced to only such things.

Slovakia as the "Heart of Europe" and Dangerous Tendencies

And we see that in its own way, in a metaphorical sense, the Catholic Church was used as a weapon in World War II, because Nazism was built on the basis of the Catholic Church. And today, we see that the Catholic Church is still being used as a weapon against LGBT people. And we really see that the entire neo-Nazi ideology is built on the basis of the Catholic Church, on the hatred towards LGBT people, on the fear of them and so on. And it is very dangerous. This constitutional amendment that is happening is also a very dangerous thing. And I am very afraid that it may not only be a problem for Slovakia, because Slovakia is the most influential country in the whole of Europe. It is truly the heart of Europe. It is not for nothing that Slovakia is said to be the center of Europe, that it is the heart of Europe. There are also very important acupuncture points of the planet in Slovakia. What will happen in Slovakia in a few years will happen in the whole of Europe. And this is not a good direction. If we continue to suppress human rights in this way and literally establish some neo-Nazi ideology directly in the constitution, these are very dangerous tendencies. I really consider it a great extreme when it is explicitly written in the constitution that there is a ban on transition and a ban on child adoptions. I see this as a very serious problem, because do the same thing you are doing to LGBT people, do it to Catholic believers. That Catholic believers are forbidden to adopt children. If this were written in the constitution, I would be very curious to see how all Catholics would be very satisfied with such a constitutional amendment. This is not explicitly written anywhere, not even in some Russian dictatorship, in Russia, in the Russian Federation, that we must hate LGBT people and we must take away their rights. And we must consider them as some second-class citizens. Not even in Russia, not even in such a harsh dictatorship as Russia. We have even surpassed Russia in Slovakia in really disgusting things. So this is really extreme. This is really a return to the 30s and 40s in Europe. As if we had returned to the past. It's really scary.

⚠️ Russia's Threat to NATO and Europe's Unpreparedness

And in general, it cannot be ruled out that Russia might even dare to attack some NATO countries. Personally, I see it as quite realistic, God forbid it happens. We believe it won't, but currently, it cannot be ruled out. And those NATO countries are much more vulnerable to Russia. Ukraine is already well-trained, well-prepared. But here in Europe, if drones started flying over us, we don't have any defense built against them in Europe. We are only now working on some procurements, on how this defense will be built in some way or other. And it's not yet ready to be prepared for any real attacks, for any real missiles or real drones. If the Russians massively launched some Shaheds at Poland or some Baltic countries, then unfortunately, we're screwed, with all due respect. I'm saying it straight. That would be a very serious problem. And even now, I personally think that even if a peace treaty were concluded with Ukraine, Russia would automatically start a war against NATO. Because once the Russians have started such enormous military production, with huge factories running at full capacity, what would they do with those Shaheds? They have to use them somewhere. They'll send them to Europe. They don't even have to send them to Ukraine. And so on. So that's just a little interesting thought about what might happen.

Russian Vulnerability and Threat to NATO

So, the Russians have certainly realized very well that NATO countries are far more vulnerable to this war than Ukraine itself. Ukraine has already endured a lot and will endure more. But we are very vulnerable. And they are certainly very well aware that it would be very unpleasant for Europe if a whole swarm of drones started flying from Russia into Europe, into NATO countries. And the Russians basically have nothing to lose. What can they lose? They are in some kind of diplomatic isolation anyway. The Western countries really can't impose any more sanctions on Russia. So what can they lose by starting a war against Europe? The Russians are very well aware of this. And I am also very well aware of it. So it's a very unpleasant thing. And we'll see. And what would they do with the soldiers who would return from the front from Ukraine? Even if there was a ceasefire, those soldiers would certainly dare to go for Europe. That's quite certain.

👥 Hatred among Progressive Slovakia Voters and the Troll Phenomenon

And another problem is that I encountered great and significant hatred from the voters of the Progressive Slovakia party. I won't say where, I won't say on which social networks, but I shared a video on the topic of how the 360 portal, that it is a disinformation portal, that it published absolute disinformation. And there was very clear, beautiful, clean evidence on this topic. So, for daring to criticize the 360 portal, some voters of Progressive Slovakia declared me a flat-earther. They called me such very ugly names. So, I am really not even a reader of alternative media. And I am not an anti-vaxxer either. I am vaccinated. But I found out that I am a flat-earther. So, I really don't see any difference in who actually has less hatred here. Whether it's a voter of the Progressive Slovakia party or a voter of the Republic. Here, the media really raise their sheep so well and manipulate them so well that any discussion there no longer made sense. So, I simply had to block those profiles. It no longer made any sense. Any discussion with such people who insult us so badly. With decent people, one can still discuss somehow. But if someone insults you like this, it no longer makes any sense. And so I really thought, what is the difference between some voters of the Republic and voters of the Progressive Slovakia party? Who actually has less hatred here? Right. So, it's a shame to comment on it. Of course, I don't want to lump all voters of the Progressive Slovakia party into one bag. There are some decent people there too. But I certainly don't agree with this. It's definitely not okay to communicate like this. And when I think about it, I was wondering if they weren't some paid trolls who wrote such nasty things to me, like three of them. But in the end, I realized that probably not. Because if you think about it, if some people really follow opposition politicians and opposition media, then basically hatred runs there from morning to night. Why should those people have any love in them when the media they follow and the politicians they follow constantly spread hatred and lies? So they don't need trolls at all, you don't need trolls to have such comments written. Although the existence of trolls cannot be ruled out. Especially during the presidential elections Korčok versus Pellegrini, when it was, I noticed a huge number of fake profiles and trolls on Facebook who communicated in a very aggressive, very hateful way in favor of Korčok. So there, for example, I noticed such things. And there it was absolutely clear that there were some empty profiles, all sorts of dubious ones.

📺 Awkward Interview: Kostolný vs. Hanus and the Failure of Argumentation

And another thing, I was watching an older video, an interview between two editors-in-chief, Matúš Kostolný and editor-in-chief Hanus. It was quite a funny interview. I'm also surprised why Matúš Kostolný invited Hanus to his show, as he came across as a complete idiot. At least when he invited Hanus, he could have prepared a bit better for the interview to have stronger arguments. And Matúš Kostolný really came across as a complete moron. Completely without any arguments. Martin Hanus mostly did all the talking in the discussion and at least with some apparent logic, he was able to defend his conservative views quite well. And Matúš Kostolný was completely taken aback. He didn't know how to react to him. And basically, the direction of the whole discussion was led by Martin Hanus himself, who did most of the talking and was able to seemingly rationally defend his opinion and completely crushed Matúš Kostolný with his arguments. So that discussion was quite embarrassing. In any case, of course, if Martin Hanus were to discuss with me, it would be the exact opposite. I would completely crush Martin Hanus with my arguments. It would be the exact opposite. So it seemed strange to me. The whole discussion was quite tragicomic.

Uncritical Copying of Arguments for the Constitutional Amendment

Otherwise, I expected the people from Postoj to be moderate conservatives. And a more decent, more moderate wing of those conservatives. But no, that's not true. So I was also surprised that the Postoj daily defended this amendment to the constitution, which is absolutely scandalous. Martin Hanus actually copied the arguments of the KDH politician Viliam Karas, who had probably the biggest share in that amendment to the constitution, word for word. So basically, he uncritically adopted his arguments word for word. During that discussion, I would have very clearly pointed out to him that: "Beware, Martin Hanus, you are actually uncritically copying the arguments of the untrustworthy Viliam Karas." Some things cannot even be easily verified whether they are true. Martin Hanus said many very dubious things there, or rather, what Viliam Karas said, that is very untrustworthy information. With very strange arguments. So, I certainly cannot agree with that.

Misinformation about the Ban on Transitions

For example, Viliam Karas, he actually claims that nothing really changes. That the amendment to the constitution is not that serious. That even the transitions can continue to function, continue to exist in some way. That it basically doesn't change anything. Of course, he tries to downplay such a topic. But these are clearly disinformation, clearly hoaxes. It is very clear from the amendment to the constitution that there is a very clear and unambiguous ban on transitions. You cannot argue your way around it. It is written very clearly. So you can't go left or right. It is written very clearly. Ban on transitions. Period. But he tried to say: "Well, we'll see about those transitions" and so on. Or some dubious judgment of some British court. He actually tried to argue about two genders, that it was de facto the same as in Great Britain, some court. But that is also very unreliable information. Such very important information should be verified to see if it is true at all, if it is not somehow taken out of context. What exactly did the court's judgment say? Personally, I would make it very clear that, okay, this is your opinion, but this is unverified information. This would require some verification, because religious fanatics tend to spread various hoaxes or fall for various hoaxes very often. So beware of this. I would clearly object to such things. But he really came across as a complete ass. And Kostolný sounded like a complete ass. The discussion there was quite tragicomic.

🌾 Problematic Shadow Minister of Agriculture of the Progressive Slovakia party

And by the way, to be even more precise, the Progressive Slovakia party has some experts, it has a shadow minister for agriculture. And he is some unknown gentleman whom I don't think I've ever seen at a press conference. And I even tried to find his Facebook profile just now, to see if he presents himself there in any way. I mean, does he present any proposals, does he present any proposals and ideas on how to be an alternative to the current government? And he is an unknown person who doesn't even have a Facebook profile. He is such an absolutely unremarkable person. So that's the "shadow minister" of the Progressive Slovakia party, in quotation marks. Experts, for the second time. No experts, to be more precise. The most that person has for a profile is, yes, it's true that he has graduated from some agricultural university in this field. But that's about it. I don't know if that's enough for a minister, but fine. And even if this minister were a real minister, at most he would have to listen to Michal Wiecik and the toughest eco-terrorists on how to destroy agriculture. And with various dubious ecological schemes, subsidy and similar nonsense, and similar bans and similar liquidation of farmers. At most, this is what he would have to do one way or another. Those eco-fascists are far more dominant in that political party than any decent people.

🕊️ Extremely Controversial US Peace Agreement Proposal

And I would also like to return to the peace agreement proposal from the United States. It is an extremely controversial 28-point proposal. And perhaps the most controversial point I would see there is that Ukraine essentially has to give up a rather large part of its territory. And that a kind of demilitarized zone should be created, where neither the Ukrainian nor the Russian army should officially enter. But at the same time, the treaty mentions a ban on any foreign peacekeeping units. This means that, in principle, if the Russians want to take a piece of that territory, they will have no problem doing so. It's really very simple there. Because if no soldier is physically guarding it, when it's a demilitarized zone, which in practice means that a Ukrainian soldier cannot guard it, a rather large area of that territory, then in practice it means that the Russians, if they want to, will be able to take another part of the territory without a fight. So, in principle, I personally think that the Russians will not resist the temptation, and they even wrote something like this into the peace treaty so that they could essentially take another part of the territory later without a fight. Because what does a demilitarized zone mean? Well, the Ukrainian soldier simply cannot guard that territory. But at the same time, any foreign, independent peacekeeping units, like some blue helmets or some other foreign units, are clearly forbidden there in that treaty. So these are absolutely nonsensical demands that are clearly absolutely disadvantageous for Ukraine. In principle, they could have just written it straight up and bluntly into the treaty that the Ukrainians should simply give up a rather large part of their territory and that's it. And there didn't even have to be a demilitarized zone defined there.