Warning: If you are not sufficiently familiar with Peter Chobot and the Tribal Shamanism YouTube channel, you may not understand all the information in this article.
First of all, I'm happy that I was able to publish a critical video about Peter Chobot. People needed to hear it, and I'm very happy for the positive feedback from people, who were at least half of the audience.
However, I will mainly address my critics. In this article, I would like to publish feedback on the very harsh attacks I had to face after publishing a critical video about Peter Chobot .
Why am I reacting so late? It's not so much that I don't have time, but because the topic of Petr Chobot is not particularly significant to me, and I currently prefer other activities.
Many people were literally possessed by insanity and anger, and they could not mentally come to terms with the fact that Petr Chobot could surprisingly have some flaws.
The Russian troll farm also got involved in the Petr Chobot topic.
This is actually the least important thing about the whole affair, so I'll put it right at the beginning to get it over with. There was a mistake. The people in the troll farm were convinced that Petr was an admirer of Putin, which is not true – the opposite is true. Petr is a very sharp critic of the Russian establishment. They probably saw a video where Petr sharply criticized illegal migration, so according to their logic, it probably meant that he was automatically an admirer of the Kremlin. The guys from the troll farm didn't see several videos I published where I also published Chobot's critical statements about the Kremlin. This event was really funny, that for the Kremlin's money, Kremlin trolls supported a critic of the Kremlin. I informed the troll farm in a very harsh and humiliating way how wrong they were. The guys must have been so embarrassed they wanted to sink into the ground. It must have been their most humiliating experience in life, and they will have to recover from this trauma for years. I don't mess around with people who spread a hateful campaign against me because it bothers me. These are people with terrible karma, who for money are willing to spread hatred in discussions from morning to night, and not only against me. Of course, then the attacks from the troll farm stopped.
I don't want to make excuses about a troll farm here, harsh and offensive comments also came from real people.
People can be extremely aggressive if someone questions their worldview. The unpleasant truth hurts.
Psychological counseling: How to mentally cope with the fact that Petr Chobot also has some flaws?
I am a person who is quite interested in the topic of psychology. As a person who meditates a lot and actively works with the subconscious/unconscious, I can better understand the human psyche. In the past, in several articles, I have looked for the origin of why people feel the need to be drawn into hateful Kremlin-funded propaganda. Now I will talk about why Peter Chobot's fans were so aggressive and angry. The catch is that people are very aggressive if someone questions their worldview, and this applies in the broadest sense of the word. If you question the worldview of a strongly religious person or a person blinded by a hateful political ideology, they will be aggressive. This also applies to Peter's fans, who have become too emotionally attached to the person of Peter Chobot.
The father of the famous journalist Janko Kuciak said it really beautifully on the topic of ideological blindness, and it applies in the broadest sense of the word: "thinking hurts" , because by thinking, a person can also come to an unpleasant truth.
It is very difficult for people to come to terms with an unpleasant truth. The truth hurts. It is much easier to start hating the person who preaches an unpleasant truth than to reflect on critical arguments and come to terms with unpleasant facts that do not fit into my worldview. This also explains the aggression of Peter Chobot's die-hard fans. It's the same aggression as when you question the worldview of a religious fanatic or a person who believes in Kremlin propaganda.
Karma alert
People don't realize what a huge karmic burden they take on when they attack me like this. Harsh attacks bother me and I don't like it. On the other hand, I can repel these attacks quite easily from an energetic point of view.
I often meditate on huge energy emitters – hills with a specific shape, geological composition, and high-quality nature with minimal human intervention. The energetic laws of the Universe dictate that only a very limited number of people have access to these hills. Any dubious esotericist would not get there, no matter how much they wanted to, and the energetic laws simply would not allow it. A lot of things happen on these hills between heaven and earth, and we could talk about it for a very long time.
On the one hand, the aggressive attacks of people in the comments are quite unpleasant for me; I perceive it as if people are sending negative energy to me. On the other hand, with energy emitters, I am able to hold up a mirror to these people, which reflects that negative energy and returns it to where it came from, often with even greater intensity. This reflected energy can manifest very quickly in that person's life, and they can experience harsh karma almost immediately. People, realize that coincidences do not exist. If some tragedy or misfortune has happened in your life recently, it was not a coincidence. It was just your energy of hatred returning to you and materializing into your destiny. People, get rid of hatred, don't do it. I warn you and I say this for your own good. You can end up very badly, and yet it is only your own karma, your image in the mirror!! I sincerely feel very sorry for these hateful esoteric poor souls, for how they have woven a whip for themselves!
(On the contrary, people who have good karma and are filled with love will reflect this positive energy and it can really help them in life)
Are you sick? Have you had an accident? Was your colleague or customer incredibly nasty to you? Were you fired from your job? Has something serious happened to your loved ones? It's no coincidence that if you wrote me a hateful comment, you know very well why it happened to you.
For God's sake, people, listen to your feelings, your own emotions tell you that hatred is bad, so why don't you listen to them? Why do you deliberately break the laws of the universe when you know you are doing evil?
People who have done a lot of evil – damaged their karma with hatred and slander, can partially improve it by sincerely admitting their mistake and regretting it.
The hatred of esotericists vs. the hatred of alternative media followers. How I endured it
After publishing the video about Peter Chobot, despite the fact that about half of the people understood it, the attacks on me were much harsher than I expected. I wasn't completely indifferent to it. If I hadn't been specially trained for this from previous cases, it would have surprised me extremely, and I would have had to withdraw the video under pressure. On the other hand, I had already been trained by previous cases where people attacked me, where people threatened me with death because of my criticism of Kremlin propaganda, and I also had to face thousands of attacks and threats.
You won't believe me, but I feel exactly the same energies from the hateful attacks of esotericists and the hateful fans of alternative media. The only difference is in the symbols, which is why people hate.
Psychology: The issue of communication. Understanding and humility of the information recipient.
This problem became apparent especially in this case, but it is much more universal in nature, as communication and understanding between people generally fail. Condemning someone without trying to understand them is a common flaw in people. People lack an incredible amount of humility. First, as the recipient of information, I must humbly reflect on whether I have understood the person correctly, and only then can I condemn them. The recipient of information is capable of condemning someone very quickly, without realizing that the real problem is themselves, who did not understand. I am very sad about how many disgusting verbal attacks people have made against me in connection with the video about Peter Chobot, without trying to understand me and without people realizing that they should have more humility and realize that the problem is themselves, who did not understand what I actually meant. Personally, when I don't like something, I first ask myself five times in my mind if I have understood the person correctly, and only then do I draw conclusions. Most people think completely differently, and because they themselves misunderstood something, they don't look for the fault in themselves but blame others.
Of course, I also admit my mistake that if I had found more time for the video, if I had prepared for it better, then in certain things there would have been no misunderstanding. And in this article, I will explain it in more detail.
************************************************************************
Now I will talk about specific attacks against the published video.
Of course, I was forced to delete all the offensive comments so that it would not encourage other insane people to aggressive slander / defamation. However, since I have a clear conscience and I know that the truth is on my side, I have no problem responding to it in writing.
Why did I make and publish such a video?
I did not explain this matter sufficiently in the video, and that is why it became the subject of aggressive attacks. I did not publish the video for personal gain, nor out of envy, as people accused me. I published it so that people would know the whole truth about Peter Chobot and so that these informed people could freely decide whether to buy herbs from him, whether to go on a trip to Peru for an exorbitant price, or whether to attend his courses. A person who does not have enough information is not free. That is why I tried to inform people.
Before publishing the video, I knew that aggressive attacks would follow, but I put myself on the line. If I only thought about myself, it would have been easier for me to stay silent and save myself the trouble. If I were a person who only thought about myself, I would have left thousands of Peter Chobot's fans in ignorance, letting him squeeze money out of them in an unethical way. However, I am not indifferent to people and I try to help wherever I can. I could have been an egoist who keeps information to himself, but I generously shared it.
I had no plans to make a video about Peter at all. The universe arranged it so that circumstances forced me to do so.
I have been harshly accused / slandered by several people of having too strong a motivation to criticize Peter. This is not true. I don't really deal with Peter Chobot, and I had planned to publish this video about half a year later, and I wasn't even sure if I would ever get around to it. Certain circumstances forced me to the point where I couldn't do my job, and the only way to effectively use my time at that moment was to record a video about Peter. It all happened suddenly, and I didn't plan it at all.
Is my video a campaign against Peter Chobot? Did I want to dissuade people from Peter's herbs?
Some malicious people have tried to argue that my goal is to deliberately run a smear campaign against Peter Chobot. This is not true.
You may notice that in the video I did not dissuade anyone from buying Peter's herbs, and I deliberately and purposefully tried to avoid it. Nowhere did I call on anyone not to buy Peter's herbs. I just carefully expressed my opinion on herbs, that they are not a panacea and may not help with everything. I could have taken the opportunity to openly call on people not to buy herbs, but I didn't. My goal is not to manipulate people, but my goal is for people to be able to freely decide whether they will continue to buy his herbs.
A side note. Additional information to make it clear: When I said in the video that I had visions that Petr would have a hard life, it was supposed to happen completely independently of this video of mine. My video can only speed up some things a little.
Is it forbidden to criticize Petr Chobot?
Some people were very bothered that I had the "audacity" to criticize Peter Chobot. So, if you are bothered that I criticize Peter Chobot, then let's ban criticism of all people, which would be an even harsher dictatorship than somewhere in North Korea. Why take criticism in a bad way? Does it mean that if I criticize someone, I hate them? Why do so many people understand it this way? Criticism is a good thing that moves us forward. We just need to accept it humbly.
The video is also not a personal attack on Peter Chobot. I do not feel any negative or positive emotions towards him, so I can be objective and unbiased towards him, unlike other people. Throughout the video, I spoke without any emotions, I only spoke about bare and verified facts.
Since I have helped Peter Chobot a lot, I have the moral right to criticize him as well.
I am among the people who helped Peter the most, and I would like to specifically point out that I helped him selflessly. The more I helped him, the more moral right I have to criticize him. Who has a greater moral right to criticize him than I do?
He published thematically very clearly edited videos where Petr appears. My videos featuring Petr are among the most watched, which in practice means that I was doing very effective advertising for him.
Thanks to the videos I published, Petr Chobot earned hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions of crowns.
To the people who are so disgustingly slandering/defaming me, I say the following: How did you help Peter? You will have the moral right to accuse me only if you helped Peter as much or more than I did. Shame on you!
I had a project developed to support rainforests, of which Petr Chobot was to be a part. How did it turn out?
I invested a lot of time in developing a certain foundation project to save the rainforests in South America. It would involve a lot of money. This project should also include someone sufficiently knowledgeable about the local terrain, in this case, Petr Chobot. Petr Chobot, or rather, someone trustworthy authorized by him, should receive a decent sum of money in this case and organize certain projects to save the rainforests. I would have only one role in this project – to mediate the foundation aspect of the matter. Chobot and his people would have to take care of everything else. However, this project had a weak point in that there would be a very weak control mechanism, and Petr could practically do whatever he wanted with the money. It would be a long-term project where Petr would receive money at regular intervals. It would also be a way for Petr to earn a reasonable amount of money in an honest and ethical way and not have to commit any herbal scams.
(Just as a side note: Petr could also earn money in an honest way. For example, so that people can see how he is really helping the Amazon, people would send him money freely without manipulation, and there would be no need to cheat with herbs.)
I am a person with clairvoyant abilities and I have always known that Petr, in terms of his personality, is an egoist who thinks primarily only of himself. The only thing that has changed with this case is that Petr Chobot himself publicly admitted what I had long known, how much he loves money, which I could not prove in black and white before, as I did in my video.
Just as a side note, I have clairvoyant abilities, so if I see someone for the first time and talk to them for even just 30 seconds, I already know what kind of character that person has. 30 seconds of conversation is enough for me to recognize the nature and characteristics of that person, and I get to know them just as if I had been working with them and known them for 10 years. I can also determine from a person how high their vibrations are and how much suffering they have in their life. I can also determine this from a video in which the person is speaking.
I don't consider my abilities to be something extraordinary. It should be a matter of course and an ability that everyone should possess. I wish it for everyone. All of us clairvoyant people unanimously and independently agree that Petr Chobot is simply a fraud. Only a spiritually blind person cannot see and feel that despite Petr having good qualities, he is essentially only after money. I sincerely feel sorry for the people who cannot see this.
We all know very well how such a project would turn out. Half of this money would be divided between Petr and Mrs. Šárka, other money would be stolen by Chobot's close associates and some of the rest might even go to the forests.
I made the best decision in my life by listening to my clairvoyant abilities, and in the end, I never contacted either Mrs. Šárka or Peter for this matter. Such projects are only for selfless people with big hearts who don't just think about themselves.
And now for the point. What did I actually want to say with this? I want to say that the insane fans of Peter Chobot did not realize against whom they were concentrating their hatred. If people who attacked me so aggressively read this article, they will be very ashamed. Who else but me would have a greater moral right to criticize Peter Chobot than I, who intended to help the Amazon rainforest and Peter himself in this way? Yes, the project was already completely finished and more than very realistic to fulfill, the only obstacle was Peter's greed.
I can't understand how much anger and hatred there is in some people. The karma of the people who slandered me like this is so bad that such serious problems and suffering have come into their lives that they won't even have the energy to reply to me a second time.
Tell me, you dear critics: What have you done for the rainforests?
Peter Chobot's reaction to the video
Petr Chobot has two options. Either he humbly accepts my well-intentioned criticism, or he doesn't and becomes even more embittered. I believe he will choose the first option. Otherwise, Petr Chobot would karmically damage himself quite badly.
I say this with full sincerity and I truly have a strong belief that Petr will choose the first option.
Peter Chobot's task is also to learn to tolerate criticism. If politicians can tolerate criticism, then I believe he can too.
Envy
But now I will continue with the main topic. I will respond in more detail to the fact that I was accused of envy as a motive for publishing that video.
Well, it's very interesting that people who don't know me at all have the clearest idea of what I'm like. Very interesting. My friend, let's meet, let's talk a little, get to know each other, and only then judge what I'm like. Maybe you've seen my first video, you know absolutely nothing about me, but despite that, you're very clear that I'm envious. If you knew me better, you would be very ashamed of such slander/defamation.
The truth is that I have serious concerns about whether I have anything to envy Peter Chobot for, as I am a significantly above-average successful person in all areas.
It's an interesting psychological rule that if someone has a major flaw in their character, paradoxically, they can pathologically see that flaw in everyone else. If you have an excessive need to accuse/slander other people of having a problem with envy, then you yourself will probably have a problem with envy.
Personal attacks
The attacks of some people were very personal and there was a huge hatred in it. There is no point in commenting on it in more detail.
Arrogant esotericists who think they have their emotions under control certainly do not have them under control and should reflect on themselves when they are clearly full of hatred.
Most completely simple, materialistic people have better karma than an arrogant esotericist who is full of hatred and doesn't even know why.
All it takes is for someone to question the idealistic image of Peter Chobot, and suddenly someone here is going to have a mental breakdown and become aggressive.
The discussions took place in roughly the following spirit:
More information
- – it is easier for people to accuse another of being bad for telling the truth about Peter than to painfully admit their own mistake, I failed, I was naive and I unnecessarily spent money on nonsense that could have been used more wisely
- -Maybe some things in the video came across differently than I intended. Petr certainly has a sincere intention to help people, but in his dual personality, the negative kleptomaniac predatory-business personality always clearly wins. The reason why Petr emphasizes his charitable personality in his interview is, from a psychological point of view, probably that he is trying to karmically justify his negative business personality in his conscience. Two personalities are fighting in Petr, and unfortunately, the negative one always wins. Just recently, Šárka's daughter wrote on her FB account, straight up, that during Šárka's lifetime, money was not used to buy land to save the rainforest. Some land was only bought recently. Unfortunately, my suspicions were confirmed. You just need to energetically tune into Petr, and you immediately see that his business-mammon personality always wins in him. He has more love for money than the desire to potentially help people.
- -just as people were very angry with me at first and hated me for my opinion about disinformation media, but now they agree with me, it will also happen in the Petr Chobot case
- It's not for nothing that I added the following in a comment under the video: I strongly ask the debaters to be polite and loving. If you react to people with a different opinion aggressively and with hatred, karma will harshly return it to you! Don't forget that! Aggression and insults are a bad way for many debaters-supporters of Peter to try to defend him. Do not damage Peter's good name by defending him in an overly aggressive way. The supporters of PCH themselves hurt him the most and do him a "disservice".