In the last three sessions, he spoke exclusively about himself and nothing else, only criticizing his opponents – this alone sounded quite exaggeratedly egocentric, narcissistic, and self-absorbed.
Páleš also deals with historical periods (repetitions) in history. No historian has yet commented on Páleš. And I doubt that his speculations would stand up to historians, who also consider him such an obscurantist that they do not even see the point in checking the truthfulness of his view of history.