{"id":2283,"date":"2023-01-15T20:46:11","date_gmt":"2023-01-15T19:46:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/2023\/01\/15\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/"},"modified":"2026-01-30T13:55:54","modified_gmt":"2026-01-30T12:55:54","slug":"autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/","title":{"rendered":"Autor Bart D. Ehrman jeho diela. V\u00fdznamn\u00fd kritik kres\u0165anstva. \u010eal\u0161ie vedeck\u00e9 pr\u00e1ce spochyb\u0148uj\u00face kres\u0165anstvo"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_83 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Autor_Bart_D_Ehrman_jeho_diela_Vyznamny_kritik_krestanstva\" >Autor Bart D. Ehrman jeho diela. V\u00fdznamn\u00fd kritik kres\u0165anstva<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Moje_recenzie_na_knihy_Bart_D_Ehrmana\" >Moje recenzie na knihy Bart D. Ehrmana<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-2' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Tertulian_a_jeho_ucenie_o_bozskej_trojici\" >Tertuli\u00e1n a jeho u\u010denie o bo\u017eskej trojici<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Nikejske_vyznanie_viery_Nikejsky_koncil\" >Nikejsk\u00e9 vyznanie viery. Nikejsk\u00fd koncil<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Vedecka_praca_od_Pier_Franco_Beatrice_Bozska_trojica_ma_pohansky_povod\" >Vedeck\u00e1 pr\u00e1ca od Pier Franco Beatrice: Bo\u017esk\u00e1 trojica m\u00e1 pohansk\u00fd p\u00f4vod<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-2' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Praca_vo_francuzstine_od_Pier_Franco_Beatrice_%E2%80%9EHelenizmus_a_krestanstvo_v_prvych_storociach_nasej_ery_Metodologicke_a_bibliograficke_cesty%E2%80%9C\" >Pr\u00e1ca vo franc\u00faz\u0161tine od Pier Franco Beatrice: \u201eHelenizmus a kres\u0165anstvo v prv\u00fdch storo\u010diach na\u0161ej \u00e9ry. Metodologick\u00e9 a bibliografick\u00e9 cesty\u201c<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Augustin_430_bol_vynalezcom_zvrateneho_ucenia_o_dedicnom_hriechu\" >August\u00edn (430) bol vyn\u00e1lezcom zvr\u00e1ten\u00e9ho u\u010denia o dedi\u010dnom hriechu<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Profesor_Jeffrey_A_Trumbower_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity\" >Profesor Jeffrey A. Trumbower: Rescue for the Dead The Posthumous Salvation of Non-Christians in Early Christianity<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Cirkevni_otcovia\" >Cirkevn\u00ed otcovia<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Dalsie_odkazy\" >\u010eal\u0161ie odkazy<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Pojem_hypostaza\" >Pojem hypost\u00e1za<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Kedy_vznikol_gnosticizmus\" >Kedy vznikol gnosticizmus?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Vyucovanie_teologie_na_teologickej_fakulte_Cirkevna_historia\" >Vyu\u010dovanie teol\u00f3gie na teologickej fakulte. Cirkevn\u00e1 hist\u00f3ria<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-2' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/#Menej_dolezita_a_menej_odporucana_literatura\" >Menej d\u00f4le\u017eit\u00e1 a menej odpor\u00fa\u010dan\u00e1 literat\u00fara<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<p><h1><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Autor_Bart_D_Ehrman_jeho_diela_Vyznamny_kritik_krestanstva\"><\/span><strong>Autor Bart D. Ehrman jeho diela. V\u00fdznamn\u00fd kritik kres\u0165anstva<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>PDF s\u00fabory v \u010de\u0161tine s\u00fa prelo\u017een\u00e9 nezn\u00e1mym prekladate\u013eom. Preklady som na\u0161iel na uloz.to<\/li>\r\n \t<li>S\u00fa tu zverejnen\u00e9 rovnak\u00e9 knihy do viacero form\u00e1tov a jazykov.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Docx s\u00fabory v sloven\u010dine a \u010de\u0161tine boli prelo\u017een\u00e9 strojovo <a href=\"https:\/\/translate.google.com\/?sl=auto&amp;tl=sk&amp;op=docs\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/translate.google.com\/?sl=auto&amp;tl=sk&amp;op=docs<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>V pr\u00edpade \u017ee tu nen\u00e1jdete form\u00e1t ktor\u00fd potrebujete, nie je probl\u00e9m prekonvertova\u0165 epub alebo docx s\u00fabory do \u013eubovo\u013en\u00e9ho form\u00e1tu, ktor\u00fd potrebujete, ke\u010f do Google zad\u00e1te napr \u201econvert docx to PDF\u201c<\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_-_Heaven_and_Hell_A_History_of_the_Afterlife-Simon_amp_Schuster_2020.docx\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_-_Heaven_and_Hell_A_History_of_the_Afterlife-Simon_amp_Schuster_2020.docx<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_-_Heaven_and_Hell_A_History_of_the_Afterlife-Simon_amp_Schuster_2020.epub\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_-_Heaven_and_Hell_A_History_of_the_Afterlife-Simon_amp_Schuster_2020.epub<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_-_Heaven_and_Hell_A_History_of_the_Afterlife-Simon_amp_Schuster_2020_cestina.docx\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_-_Heaven_and_Hell_A_History_of_the_Afterlife-Simon_amp_Schuster_2020_cestina.docx<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_-_Heaven_and_Hell_A_History_of_the_Afterlife-Simon_amp_Schuster_2020_slovencina.docx\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_-_Heaven_and_Hell_A_History_of_the_Afterlife-Simon_amp_Schuster_2020_slovencina.docx<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_Chybne_citovany_Jezis_cestina.pdf\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_Chybne_citovany_Jezis_cestina.pdf<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_Interrupce_Jezise.pdf\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_Interrupce_Jezise.pdf<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_Jak_se_Jezis_stal_Bohem.pdf\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_Jak_se_Jezis_stal_Bohem.pdf<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_Jezis_apokalypticky_prorok_noveho_tisicileti_cestina.pdf\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_Jezis_apokalypticky_prorok_noveho_tisicileti_cestina.pdf<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_Jezis_pred_evangelii.pdf\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_Jezis_pred_evangelii.pdf<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_Padelane.pdf\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_Padelane.pdf<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_The_Triumph_of_Christianity_-How_a_Forbidden_Religion_Swept_the_World_2018.docx\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_The_Triumph_of_Christianity_-How_a_Forbidden_Religion_Swept_the_World_2018.docx<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_The_Triumph_of_Christianity_-How_a_Forbidden_Religion_Swept_the_World_2018.epub\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_The_Triumph_of_Christianity_-How_a_Forbidden_Religion_Swept_the_World_2018.epub<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_The_Triumph_of_Christianity_-How_a_Forbidden_Religion_Swept_the_World_2018_cestina.docx\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_The_Triumph_of_Christianity_-How_a_Forbidden_Religion_Swept_the_World_2018_cestina.docx<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_The_Triumph_of_Christianity_-How_a_Forbidden_Religion_Swept_the_World_2018_slovencina.docx\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Bart_D_Ehrman_The_Triumph_of_Christianity_-How_a_Forbidden_Religion_Swept_the_World_2018_slovencina.docx<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Heaven_and_Hell_Bart_D_Ehrman.pdf\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Heaven_and_Hell_Bart_D_Ehrman.pdf<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Tertullian_on_the_Trinity.pdf\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Tertullian_on_the_Trinity.pdf<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/THE_NEW_TESTAMENT_A_HISTORICAL_INTRODUCTION_TO_THE_EARLY_CHRISTIAN_WRITINGS.docx\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/THE_NEW_TESTAMENT_A_HISTORICAL_INTRODUCTION_TO_THE_EARLY_CHRISTIAN_WRITINGS.docx<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/THE_NEW_TESTAMENT_A_HISTORICAL_INTRODUCTION_TO_THE_EARLY_CHRISTIAN_WRITINGS.epub\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/THE_NEW_TESTAMENT_A_HISTORICAL_INTRODUCTION_TO_THE_EARLY_CHRISTIAN_WRITINGS.epub<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/THE_NEW_TESTAMENT_A_HISTORICAL_INTRODUCTION_TO_THE_EARLY_CHRISTIAN_WRITINGS_Slovencina.docx\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/THE_NEW_TESTAMENT_A_HISTORICAL_INTRODUCTION_TO_THE_EARLY_CHRISTIAN_WRITINGS_Slovencina.docx<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h1><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Moje_recenzie_na_knihy_Bart_D_Ehrmana\"><\/span><strong>Moje recenzie na knihy Bart D. Ehrmana<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><span lang=\"sk-SK\">Najviac odpor\u00fa\u010dam tieto dve jeho knihy nako\u013eko maj\u00fa najv\u00e4\u010d\u0161\u00ed teologick\u00fd v\u00fdznam:<\/span>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><span lang=\"sk-SK\">How Jesus Became God <\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li><span lang=\"sk-SK\">Heaven and Hell<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n \t<li><span lang=\"sk-SK\">uveden\u00e9 knihy m\u00e1m aj pre\u010d\u00edtan\u00e9<\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li><span lang=\"sk-SK\">Ehrman je skvel\u00fd autor, kde hovor\u00ed o viacero historick\u00fdch s\u00favislostiach, cituje tzv. cirkevn\u00fdch otcov \u010do s\u00fa ranno kres\u0165ansk\u00ed spisovatelia na ktor\u00fdch sa odvol\u00e1va cirkev. <\/span><span lang=\"sk-SK\">Ich n\u00e1zory s\u00fa kac\u00edrske z poh\u013eadu s\u00fa\u010dasnej cirkvi. Rann\u00ed kres\u0165ansk\u00ed spisovatelia boli v\u0161etci kac\u00edri, tak cirkev sa mus\u00ed odvol\u00e1va\u0165 aj na nich, hoci veriacim nepovie o nich cel\u00fa pravdu<\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li><span lang=\"sk-SK\">hovor\u00ed o pravdivej hist\u00f3rii kres\u0165anstva a kres\u0165ansk\u00fdch dogiem, tak ako sa naozaj stali, nie ako by sa priala cirkev a veriaci.<\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li><span lang=\"sk-SK\">Je fascinuj\u00face, \u017ee veriaci nepoznaj\u00fa svoju vlastn\u00fa hist\u00f3riu<\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li><span lang=\"sk-SK\">hovor\u00ed o interpret\u00e1cii Biblie nie tak ako si to interpretuje cirkev ale to \u010do s t\u00fdm chcel p\u00f4vodn\u00fd autor poveda\u0165<\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li><span lang=\"sk-SK\">autor je ateista a materialista, \u010do d\u00e1va najavo, je to v jeho \u010dl\u00e1nkoch c\u00edti\u0165, trochu mi to lezie na nervy ale inak OK<\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li><span lang=\"sk-SK\">na niektor\u00e9 t\u00e9my m\u00e1me odli\u0161n\u00e9 n\u00e1zory. Napr. to \u010di v Biblii s\u00fa alebo nie s\u00fa argumenty o bo\u017estve Krista<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Tertulian_a_jeho_ucenie_o_bozskej_trojici\"><\/span><strong>Tertuli\u00e1n a jeho u\u010denie o bo\u017eskej trojici<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>V t\u00fdchto \u010dastiach len dop\u013a\u0148am svoje pozn\u00e1mky ktor\u00e9 s\u00favisia\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tertullian\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tertullian<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.intratext.com\/IXT\/ENG0272\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">http:\/\/www.intratext.com\/IXT\/ENG0272\/<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.intratext.com\/Catalogo\/Autori\/AUT369.HTM\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">http:\/\/www.intratext.com\/Catalogo\/Autori\/AUT369.HTM<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/332256750_Tertullian_on_the_Trinity\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/332256750_Tertullian_on_the_Trinity<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><span lang=\"sk-SK\">Stanfordsk\u00e1 encyklop\u00e9dia filozofie. Dejiny troji\u010dn\u00fdch doktr\u00edn <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/trinity\/trinity-history.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/trinity\/trinity-history.html<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.intratext.com\/IXT\/ENG0272\/_PS.HTM#IV\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span lang=\"sk-SK\">http:\/\/www.intratext.com\/IXT\/ENG0272\/_PS.HTM#IV<\/span><\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><span lang=\"sk-SK\">Polyteistick\u00e9 vyjadrenie Tertuli\u00e1na: <\/span><span lang=\"sk-SK\">Him from His anointing, thus suggesting the proviso that Christ must be the Son, not the Father. How blind, to be sure, is the man who fails to perceive that by the name of Christ some other God is implied, if he ascribes to the Father this name of Christ! For if Christ is God the Father, when He says, &#8220;I ascend unto my Father and your Father, and to my God and your God,&#8221; He of course shows plainly enough that there is above <strong>Himself another Father and another God<\/strong>. If, again, the Father is Christ, He must be some other Being who &#8220;strengtheneth the thunder, and createth the wind, and declareth unto men His Christ.&#8221; And if &#8220;the kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers were gathered together against the Lord and against His Christ,&#8221; that Lord must be another Being, against whose Christ were gathered together the kings and the rulers. And if, to quote another passage, &#8220;Thus saith the Lord to my Lord Christ,&#8221; the Lord who speaks to the Father of Christ must be a distinct Being. <\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h1><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Nikejske_vyznanie_viery_Nikejsky_koncil\"><\/span><strong>Nikejsk\u00e9 vyznanie viery. Nikejsk\u00fd koncil\r\n<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>Jedn\u00e1 sa o my\u0161lienky ktor\u00e9 mi napadli v s\u00favislosti s \u010d\u00edtan\u00edm kn\u00edh autora, doplnenie autora.\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Zauj\u00edmavos\u0165 \u017ee nikejsko-kon\u0161tatinopolsk\u00e9 vyznanie viery nehovor\u00ed ni\u010d o jednom Bohu<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Syn a Duch sv\u00e4t\u00fd s\u00fa v nich ozna\u010den\u00e9 ako podriaden\u00e9 Bo\u017estv\u00e1 k Bohu Otcovi, \u010do je z poh\u013eadu s\u00fa\u010dasnej teol\u00f3gie hlavn\u00e9ho pr\u00fadu kac\u00edrska my\u0161lienka<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Kres\u0165ania si neuvedomuj\u00fa, \u017ee Nikejsk\u00fd koncil sa nekonal pre dobro cirkvi. (Viac inform\u00e1cii v uveden\u00fdch publik\u00e1ciach. Jednalo sa \u010disto o politiku. Koncil bol organizovan\u00fd cis\u00e1rom Kon\u0161tant\u00ednom, ktor\u00e9ho znepokojovalo rozdelenie spolo\u010dnosti r\u00f4znych pr\u00fadov kres\u0165anstva a t\u00fdm aj politick\u00e1 a mocensk\u00e1 nestabilita R\u00edmskej r\u00ed\u0161e. Koncil nebol zvolan\u00fd na podnet biskupov ale na podnet cis\u00e1ra. Preto otvorene vyzval aby sa biskupi nejako dohodli a uzavreli spolo\u010dn\u00e9 jednotn\u00e9 vyhl\u00e1senie podobne ako tomu dnes v politike hovor\u00edme konsenzus alebo kompromis. Ne\u0161lo len o ari\u00e1nov, Kres\u0165ansk\u00fdch pr\u00fadov bolo mnoho. Existovali kres\u0165ania ktor\u00ed vn\u00edmali bo\u017esk\u00fa trojicu ako \u010disto polyteizmus, in\u00ed kres\u0165ania boli striktn\u00ed monoteisti <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Monophysitism\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">monofyziti<\/a> alebo <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Modalistic_Monarchianism\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">modalisti<\/a>. A v\u00fdsledkom tohto kompromisu bolo prv\u00e9 formovanie u\u010denia o Bo\u017eskej trojici \u010do je nie\u010do medzi polyteizmom a monoteizmom. Zauj\u00edmav\u00e9, \u017ee nikejsk\u00e9 vyznanie sa vyh\u00fdba v tej dobe ve\u013emi citlivej t\u00e9me ktor\u00e1 extr\u00e9mne rozde\u013eovala spolo\u010dnos\u0165. Nehovor\u00ed sa tam ni\u010d o tom, \u010di je jeden alebo viacero bohov. Hovor\u00ed sa tam len o existencii Otca a Syna, ktor\u00ed s\u00fa obaja bohovia, pri\u010dom syn je nepriamo ozna\u010den\u00fd ako ni\u017e\u0161ie bo\u017estvo.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul><h1><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Vedecka_praca_od_Pier_Franco_Beatrice_Bozska_trojica_ma_pohansky_povod\"><\/span><strong>Vedeck\u00e1 pr\u00e1ca od Pier Franco Beatrice: Bo\u017esk\u00e1 trojica m\u00e1 pohansk\u00fd p\u00f4vod<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>(Niektor\u00e9 pozn\u00e1mky v tomto \u010dl\u00e1nku n\u00e1jdete v inej literat\u00fare ako v tejto pr\u00e1ci profesora, d\u00e1vam veci do s\u00favislosti. Pier Franco Beatrice je v\u00fdznamn\u00fd uzn\u00e1van\u00fd taliansky profesor religionista. Jeho pr\u00e1ca s n\u00e1zvom \u201eThe Word Homoousios from Hellenism to Christianity\u201c je jedna s najsilnej\u0161\u00edch vedeck\u00fdch pr\u00e1c \u010do do spochybnenia ortodoxn\u00e9ho kres\u0165anstva. Hovor\u00ed o p\u00f4vode pojmu homoousios rovnakej podstaty. Po pre\u010d\u00edtan\u00ed tejto pr\u00e1ce polovica kres\u0165anov prestane by\u0165 kres\u0165anmi, preto\u017ee dokazuje silne pohansk\u00fd p\u00f4vod kres\u0165anstva. Pojem homoousios bol nesk\u00f4r v cirkvi nahraden\u00fd pojmom hypostasis aby to neznelo tak pohansky. Beatrice hovor\u00ed, \u017ee pohansk\u00fa terminol\u00f3giu homoousios prik\u00e1zal s\u00e1m Kon\u0161tant\u00edn o \u010dom p\u00ed\u0161e aj cirkevn\u00fd historik Eusebius. Nikejsk\u00e9 vyznanie z nikejsk\u00e9ho koncilu hovor\u00ed o z\u00e1kladnom bohu Otcovi a jeho podriadenom Bohu ktor\u00ed s\u00fa rovnakej homoousios.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Ak som spr\u00e1vne pochopil profesora Beatrice, tak aj pojem Logos (spom\u00ednan\u00fd aj v Biblii v kontexte mo\u017en\u00e9ho Bo\u017estva Krista) je pohansk\u00e1 terminol\u00f3gia pre bo\u017estv\u00e1, ktor\u00fa si gr\u00e9cky autor p\u00f4vodom konvertovan\u00fd pohan na kres\u0165anstvo, prepo\u017ei\u010dal z pohanstva.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Otec a Syn je to ist\u00e9 \u010do v pohanskom helenizme \/ hermetizme bohovia Hermes a Th\u00f3th. Panensk\u00e9 po\u010datie boha v hermetizme a v kres\u0165anstve tie\u017e potvrdzuje in\u0161pir\u00e1ciu zmanipulova\u0165 Bibliu pod\u013ea pohansk\u00fdch predst\u00e1v, \u010do je tie\u017e dok\u00e1zan\u00e9.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Zauj\u00edmav\u00e9 \u017ee aj cirkevn\u00fd otec Tertuli\u00e1n otca a syna popisuje rovnako ako bohov Hermesa a Th\u00f3tha \u010do do prirovnania slnko (=Otec) a l\u00fa\u010d (=Syn.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>The Word \u201cHomoousios\u201d from Hellenism to Christianity<br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/go.gale.com\/ps\/i.do?p=AONE&amp;u=googlescholar&amp;id=GALE-7CA89816070&amp;v=2.1&amp;it=r&amp;asid=3536c4c6\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/go.gale.com\/ps\/i.do?p=AONE&amp;u=googlescholar&amp;id=GALE|A89816070&amp;v=2.1&amp;it=r&amp;asid=3536c4c6<\/a><br \/><br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.dge.filol.csic.es\/DGE-I\/RBLG-D\/CJO\/Beatrice-202002.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/www.dge.filol.csic.es\/DGE-I\/RBLG-D\/CJO\/Beatrice-202002.pdf<\/a><br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/journals\/church-history\/article\/abs\/word-homoousios-from-hellenism-to-christianity\/A9C901BED414F2B52828E0587F15C6CD\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/journals\/church-history\/article\/abs\/word-homoousios-from-hellenism-to-christianity\/A9C901BED414F2B52828E0587F15C6CD<\/a><br \/><br \/>D\u00f4le\u017eit\u00e1 terminol\u00f3gia k pochopeniu profesorovho \u010dl\u00e1nku:<br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hermes_Trismegistus\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hermes_Trismegistus<\/a><br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hermeticism\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hermeticism<\/a><br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Homoousion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Homoousion<\/a><br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ousia\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ousia<\/a><br \/><br \/>Menej d\u00f4le\u017eit\u00e9 odkazy:<br \/><br \/>The Word &#8220;Homoousios&#8221; from Hellenism to Christianity. \u2026. University of Cambridge \u010dasopis <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/4146467\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/4146467<\/a><br \/><br \/>Pier Franco Beatrice, Univerzita v Padove, Katedra historick\u00fdch, geografick\u00fdch a starovek\u00fdch vied, \u010dlen fakulty <a href=\"https:\/\/unipd.academia.edu\/pierfrancobeatrice\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/unipd.academia.edu\/pierfrancobeatrice<\/a><br \/><br \/>Prenos hriechu: August\u00edn a predaugustinsk\u00e9 zdroje od Piera Franca Beatrice (kritick\u00e1 recenzia kres\u0165ansk\u00e9ho fundamentalistu) <a href=\"https:\/\/muse.jhu.edu\/pub\/16\/article\/538496\/pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/muse.jhu.edu\/pub\/16\/article\/538496\/pdf<\/a><br \/><br \/><h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Praca_vo_francuzstine_od_Pier_Franco_Beatrice_%E2%80%9EHelenizmus_a_krestanstvo_v_prvych_storociach_nasej_ery_Metodologicke_a_bibliograficke_cesty%E2%80%9C\"><\/span><strong>Pr\u00e1ca vo franc\u00faz\u0161tine od Pier Franco Beatrice: \u201eHelenizmus a kres\u0165anstvo v prv\u00fdch storo\u010diach na\u0161ej \u00e9ry. Metodologick\u00e9 a bibliografick\u00e9 cesty\u201c<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>V tejto pr\u00e1ceis\u00fa potvrden\u00e9 inform\u00e1cie z Anglickej Wikip\u00e9die o tom, \u017ee v R\u00edmskej r\u00ed\u0161i bola st\u00e1le ve\u013emi \u017eiv\u00e1 a ve\u013emi siln\u00e1 pohansk\u00e1 komunita do 6-7. storo\u010dia a teda kres\u0165ania nerobili agres\u00edvnu evanjeliz\u00e1ciu, preto\u017ee neverili v dedi\u010dn\u00fd hriech a zatratenie nekres\u0165anov.\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>docx <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Helenizmus_a_krestanstvo_v_prvych_storociach_nasho_letopoctu_Metodologicke_a_bibliograficke_cesty.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Helenizmus_a_krestanstvo_v_prvych_storociach_nasho_letopoctu_Metodologicke_a_bibliograficke_cesty.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>docx <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Helenizmus_a_krestanstvo_v_prvych_storociach_nasho_letopoctu_Metodologicke_a_bibliograficke_cesty.docx_slovensky.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Helenizmus_a_krestanstvo_v_prvych_storociach_nasho_letopoctu_Metodologicke_a_bibliograficke_cesty.docx_slovensky.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>PDF <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Helenizmus_a_krestanstvo_v_prvych_storociach_nasho_letopoctu_Metodologicke_a_bibliograficke_cesty.pdf\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Helenizmus_a_krestanstvo_v_prvych_storociach_nasho_letopoctu_Metodologicke_a_bibliograficke_cesty.pdf<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul><h1><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Augustin_430_bol_vynalezcom_zvrateneho_ucenia_o_dedicnom_hriechu\"><\/span><strong>August\u00edn (430) bol vyn\u00e1lezcom zvr\u00e1ten\u00e9ho u\u010denia o dedi\u010dnom hriechu<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Kvalitn\u00e1 pr\u00e1ca kres\u0165ana hlavn\u00e9ho pr\u00fadu od Anthony Dupont, Catholic University Leuven. Hoci v tejto pr\u00e1ci sa teol\u00f3g prizn\u00e1va, \u017ee m\u00e1 ve\u013emi siln\u00e9 zbo\u017en\u00e9 prianie aby u\u010denie o dedi\u010dnom hriechu a krste malo star\u0161\u00ed p\u00f4vod ako August\u00edn (zomrel v roku 430), aby to zapadalo do jeho cirkevn\u00fdch predst\u00e1v, samotn\u00e1 jeho pr\u00e1ca dokazuje jasn\u00fd opak. Aj jeho pr\u00e1ca potvrdzuje fakt, \u017ee August\u00edn bol prv\u00fd kto objavil zvr\u00e1ten\u00e9 u\u010denie o dedi\u010dnom hriechu ako najd\u00f4le\u017eitej\u0161ie u\u010denie ortodoxn\u00e9ho kres\u0165anstva hlavn\u00e9ho pr\u00fadu. V <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/preco-je-biblia-najsilnejsia-protikrestanska-kniha-preco-cirkev-hrozila-trestnom-smrti-za-vlastnictvo-bibli\">inom \u010dl\u00e1nku<\/a> podrobnej\u0161ie popisujem zvr\u00e1tenos\u0165 u\u010denia o dedi\u010dnom hriechu.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Hlavn\u00fd pr\u00fad s\u00fa\u010dasn\u00e9ho kres\u0165anstva je najviac ovplyvnen\u00fd August\u00ednom, hoci v tej dobe bolo jeho u\u010denie naprosto men\u0161inov\u00fd n\u00e1zor.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Anthony Dupont potvrdzuje, \u017ee August\u00edn (430) bol vyn\u00e1lezcom zvr\u00e1ten\u00e9ho u\u010denia o dedi\u010dnom hriechu.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>August\u00edn sa odvol\u00e1val na predchodcov cirkevn\u00fdch otcov Cypri\u00e1na a Tertuli\u00e1na, \u017ee aj oni hl\u00e1sali u\u010denie o dedi\u010dnom hriechu a naliehavej potrebe krstu. Jedn\u00e1 sa o klamstvo, teol\u00f3g Dupont ni\u010d tak\u00e9 nena\u0161iel. Klam\u00e1ra August\u00edna vyhl\u00e1sila cirkev za sv\u00e4t\u00e9ho.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Pr\u00e1ca teol\u00f3ga Anthona Duponta je perfektn\u00e1 a\u017e na abstrakt, ktor\u00fd je zav\u00e1dzaj\u00face klamstvo. Jadro pr\u00e1ce je super. Navzdory tomu, \u017ee si dal Anthony Dupont extr\u00e9mne ve\u013ea pr\u00e1ce aby na\u0161iel star\u0161ie u\u010denie o dedi\u010dnom hriechu ako August\u00edn, nena\u0161iel ni\u010d.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>docx <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Original_Sin_in_Tertullian_and_Cyprian-_Conceptual_Presence_and_Pre-Augustinian_Content.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Original_Sin_in_Tertullian_and_Cyprian-_Conceptual_Presence_and_Pre-Augustinian_Content.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>PDF <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Original_Sin_in_Tertullian_and_Cyprian-_Conceptual_Presence_and_Pre-Augustinian_Content.pdf\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Original_Sin_in_Tertullian_and_Cyprian-_Conceptual_Presence_and_Pre-Augustinian_Content.pdf<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>docx <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Original_Sin_in_Tertullian_and_Cyprian-_Conceptual_Presence_and_Pre-Augustinian_Content_slovensky.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Original_Sin_in_Tertullian_and_Cyprian-_Conceptual_Presence_and_Pre-Augustinian_Content_slovensky.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul><h1><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Profesor_Jeffrey_A_Trumbower_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity\"><\/span><strong>Profesor Jeffrey A. Trumbower: Rescue for the Dead The Posthumous Salvation of Non-Christians in Early Christianity<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Jedn\u00e1 sa o americk\u00e9ho profesora ktor\u00fd je \u010do do s\u00fakromn\u00e9ho vierovyznania <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Unitarianism\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">unit\u00e1r<\/a>. Extr\u00e9mne kvalitn\u00e1 kniha, ktor\u00e9 musela da\u0165 mnoho rokov tvrdej pr\u00e1ce. Kniha vy\u0161la aj v ofici\u00e1lnej tla\u010diarni Oxfordskej univerzity ako vedeck\u00e1 publik\u00e1cia.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>K\u00fdm ja sa zaober\u00e1m absenciou zatratenia pre nekres\u0165anov v Biblii, profesor hovor\u00ed o t\u00e9me sp\u00e1sy pre pohanov. Kres\u0165ania verili v sp\u00e1su nekres\u0165anov. Zmenil to a\u017e August\u00edn (ktor\u00fd mimochodom ako prv\u00fd pri\u0161iel s my\u0161lienkou \u0161\u00edri\u0165 kres\u0165anstvo n\u00e1sil\u00edm.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Tie\u017e sa p\u00e1n profesor trochu pom\u00fdlil s interpret\u00e1ciou Biblie, ke\u010f zabudol citova\u0165 aj mnoh\u00e9 v\u00fdroky z Biblie a cirkevn\u00fdch otcov, ke\u010f ako po\u017eiadavka pre sp\u00e1su je v\u0161eobecn\u00e1 etika, nie ani tak krst a kres\u0165ansk\u00e1 viera. Av\u0161ak aj tak sa jedn\u00e1 o zauj\u00edmav\u00fa publik\u00e1ciu.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Hovor\u00ed o gnostikoch ktor\u00ed verili na reinkarn\u00e1ciu, pri\u010dom cie\u013e je oslobodi\u0165 sa od potreby reinkarn\u00e1cie a post\u00fapi\u0165 do vy\u0161\u0161\u00edch dimenzi\u00ed.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Hovor\u00ed tie\u017e o viacero nie-gnostick\u00fdch apokryfoch, ktor\u00e9 potvrdzuj\u00fa vieru v sp\u00e1su pohanov.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Origenes explicitne veril na reinkarn\u00e1ciu.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Cirkev reinkarn\u00e1ciu spochybnila na koncile.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Hovor\u00ed o tom, ako August\u00edn bojoval s Bibliou a ve\u013emi sa mu nep\u00e1\u010dili miesta v Biblii, ktor\u00e9 spochyb\u0148uj\u00fa dedi\u010dn\u00fd hriech to jest trval\u00e9 nekone\u010dn\u00e9 peklo pre nekres\u0165anov.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>T\u00e1to kniha je at\u00f3mov\u00e1 zbra\u0148 proti kres\u0165anstvu. Spochyb\u0148uje ortodoxn\u00e9 kres\u0165anstvo v Absol\u00fatnych z\u00e1kladoch<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Profesor Trumbower upozor\u0148uje na najstar\u0161\u00ed ucelen\u00fd rukopis Biblie <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Codex_Sinaiticus\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Codex Sinaiticus<\/a>. K\u00fdm s\u00fa\u010das\u0165ou Codex Sinaiticus (s\u00fa\u010das\u0165 kan\u00f3nu) bola aj kniha Hermasov pastier, s\u00fa\u010dasn\u00e9 Biblie ju neobsahuj\u00fa. Hermasov pastier obsahuje siln\u00e9 argumenty v prospech sp\u00e1sy pohanov, \u010do je v rozpore s u\u010den\u00edm dedi\u010dn\u00e9ho hriechu. Cirkev ve\u013emi dobre vedela pre\u010do t\u00fato knihu s Biblie odstr\u00e1nila.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Nev\u00fdhoda pr\u00e1ce profesora Trumbowera je to, \u017ee sa problematikou zaober\u00e1 z\u00fa\u017een\u00fdm uh\u013eom poh\u013eadu. Nie v\u00fdlu\u010dne ale preva\u017ene sa zaober\u00e1 argumentami \u010do sa t\u00fdka sp\u00e1sy pohanov ako posmrtn\u00fd krst pohanov, modlitby za m\u0155tvych, hoci ur\u010dite by sa dali n\u00e1js\u0165 aj priamej\u0161ie tvrdenia. Av\u0161ak aj tento z\u00fa\u017een\u00fd uhol poh\u013eadu m\u00e1 ve\u013ek\u00fa hodnotu.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Profesor upozor\u0148uje na to ako August\u00edn silne bojoval s Je\u017ei\u0161ovymi slovami Biblie, \u017ee trest v pekle nie je ve\u010dn\u00fd ale len do\u010dasn\u00fd.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Treba si da\u0165 pozor aby nedo\u0161lo k nepochopeniu profesora. Katol\u00edcka cirkev ani po 2. vatik\u00e1nskom koncile nijak extr\u00e9mne nemenila u\u010denie o dedi\u010dnom hriechu. D\u00e1va len ur\u010dit\u00fa drobn\u00fa n\u00e1dej, nie istotu v sp\u00e1su nepokrsten\u00fdch det\u00ed.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>S\u00favisiace:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pelagianism\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pelagianism<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pelagius\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pelagius<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul><ul>\r\n \t<li>docx <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Trumbower_Reincarnation_2016.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Trumbower_Reincarnation_2016.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>PDF <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Trumbower_Reincarnation_2016.pdf\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Trumbower_Reincarnation_2016.pdf<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>docx <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Trumbower_Reincarnation_2016_slovensky.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Trumbower_Reincarnation_2016_slovensky.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>docx <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Trumbower_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Trumbower_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>PDF <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Trumbower_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity.pdf\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Trumbower_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity.pdf<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>docx <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Trumbower_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity_Slovencina.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/Trumbower_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity_Slovencina.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul><strong>Recenzia na jeho pr\u00e1cu. Stru\u010dn\u00e9 zhrnutie<\/strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>docx <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/book_review_Trumbower_Jeffrey_A_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity_Reviewed_by_Hans_A_Pohlsander.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/book_review_Trumbower_Jeffrey_A_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity_Reviewed_by_Hans_A_Pohlsander.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>PDF <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/book_review_Trumbower_Jeffrey_A_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity_Reviewed_by_Hans_A_Pohlsander.pdf\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/book_review_Trumbower_Jeffrey_A_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity_Reviewed_by_Hans_A_Pohlsander.pdf<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>PDF <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/book_review_Trumbower_Jeffrey_A_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity_Reviewed_by_Hans_A_Pohlsander_slovensky.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/book_review_Trumbower_Jeffrey_A_Rescue_for_the_Dead_The_Posthumous_Salvation_of_Non-Christians_in_Early_Christianity_Reviewed_by_Hans_A_Pohlsander_slovensky.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul><h1><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Cirkevni_otcovia\"><\/span><strong>Cirkevn\u00ed otcovia<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>V\u0161etci cirkevn\u00ed otcovia (=\u010do s\u00fa spisovatelia, teol\u00f3govia medzi priamymi Je\u017ei\u0161ov\u00fdmi u\u010den\u00edkmi a August\u00ednom) pred August\u00ednom s\u00fa z poh\u013eadu s\u00fa\u010dasnej kres\u0165anskej teol\u00f3gie extr\u00e9mni kac\u00edri, heretici, ktor\u00ed spochyb\u0148uj\u00fa u\u010denie o Bo\u017eskej trojici alebo in\u00e9 extr\u00e9mne d\u00f4le\u017eit\u00e9 dogmy, bez ktor\u00fdch by nebolo kres\u0165anstvo kres\u0165anstvom. Neexistuje ani jeden jedin\u00fd cirkevn\u00fd otec, ktor\u00fd by nespochybnil s\u00fa\u010dasn\u00e9 kres\u0165anstvo v absol\u00fatnych z\u00e1kladoch. <strong>Napriek tomu sa aj o t\u00fdchto kac\u00edroch vyu\u010duje na kres\u0165ansk\u00fdch teologick\u00fdch fakult\u00e1ch ako o pozit\u00edvnych \u013eu\u010foch, ktor\u00ed dali z\u00e1klad kres\u0165anstvu, preto\u017ee ni\u010d in\u00e9 katol\u00edckej cirkvi neost\u00e1va. Preto\u017ee potom by o hist\u00f3rii cirkvi medzi prv\u00fdm a\u017e \u0161iestym storo\u010d\u00edm vyu\u010dova\u0165 nemohla v\u00f4bec.<\/strong><\/li>\r\n \t<li>Zauj\u00edmav\u00e9 \u017ee kres\u0165ania nepoznaj\u00fa svoju vlastn\u00fa hist\u00f3riu. Preto\u017ee keby ju poznali, ich kres\u0165anstvo by spadlo ako dom\u010dek s kar\u00e1t.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Napriek tomu cirkvi neost\u00e1va ni\u010d in\u00e9 ako predsa len na teologickej fakulte vyu\u010dova\u0165 aj o u\u010den\u00ed cirkevn\u00fdch otcov, \u010do je prejav absol\u00fatneho z\u00fafalstva, preto\u017ee in\u00ed teol\u00f3govia ako len \u201ekac\u00edri\u201c do 6 storo\u010dia neexistuj\u00fa. Samozrejme v\u00fdu\u010dba na teologickej fakulte je extr\u00e9mne zmanipulovan\u00e1, vyu\u010duje sa tak, \u017ee vytrhn\u00fa len 1- ich v\u00fdrokov z kontextu, ktor\u00e9 cirkevnej viere neodporuj\u00fa.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Profesor Jeffrey A. Trumbower upozor\u0148uje, \u017ee mnoho spisov cirkevn\u00fdch otcov boli zmanipulovan\u00e9. Zmanipulovan\u00e9 preklady, existuj\u00fa r\u00f4zne verzie toho ist\u00e9ho diela, at\u010f. Neskor\u0161\u00ed prepisova\u010di, zmanipulovali obsah diel cirkevn\u00fdch otcov tak aby to zapadalo ortodoxn\u00e9mu kres\u0165anstvu.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Na jednej strane na koncile cirkev zavrhla Origenove spisy, na druhej strane ho cirkev dodnes intenz\u00edvne cituje, preto\u017ee do 6. storo\u010dia existuj\u00fa len \u201ekac\u00edri\u201c a cirkev nem\u00e1 na v\u00fdber. \u0160ialen\u00fd paradox<\/li>\r\n \t<li>aj viacer\u00ed cirkevn\u00ed otcovia sa sna\u017eili manipulova\u0165 Bibliu svojimi extr\u00e9mnymi interpret\u00e1ciami, ktor\u00e9 vy nena\u0161li pochopenie ani medzi s\u00fa\u010dasn\u00fdmi konzervat\u00edvnymi teol\u00f3gmi. Napr. Tertuli\u00e1n a \u010fal\u0161\u00ed sa sna\u017eia n\u00e1silne interpretova\u0165 Bibliu, \u017ee Biblia potvrdzuje bo\u017estvo Krista na z\u00e1klade argument\u00e1cie o m\u00fadrosti. Jeho logika: Kristus=m\u00fadros\u0165 + cituje z Biblie v\u00fdroky o m\u00fadrosti.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Tertuli\u00e1n radik\u00e1lne zni\u017euje bo\u017estvo Krista v Bo\u017eskej trojici. Otca prirovn\u00e1va ku slnku a a Syna k l\u00fa\u010du. Syna Je\u017ei\u0161a prirovn\u00e1va k anjelom. Dnes by ho kres\u0165ania pova\u017eovali za \u0161ialen\u00e9ho kac\u00edra, ktor\u00e9ho treba up\u00e1li\u0165. Probl\u00e9m, \u017ee v tej dobe boli v\u0161etci teol\u00f3govia tak\u00fdto kac\u00edri.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Cirkevn\u00ed otcovia ako J\u00e1n Chryzostom alebo August\u00edn, boli posadnut\u00ed nen\u00e1vis\u0165ou proti \u017didom. M\u00f4j n\u00e1zor \u017ee d\u00f4vod ich nen\u00e1visti bol ten, \u017eidia, ktor\u00ed konvertovali na kres\u0165anstvo sa striktne riadili monoteizmom a odmietali bo\u017estvo krista. Dominantn\u00ed boli ale pohania, ktor\u00ed konvertovali na kres\u0165anstvo, takzvan\u00ed pohanokres\u0165ania. T\u00fdm bolo \u0165a\u017ek\u00e9 prejs\u0165 s polyteizmu na striktn\u00fd monoteizmus, preto vymysleli u\u010denie o bo\u017eskej trojici. Zotrva\u010dnos\u0165 pohanstva bola siln\u00e1.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul><h1><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Dalsie_odkazy\"><\/span><strong>\u010eal\u0161ie odkazy<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Biblick\u00e9 argumenty pochybuj\u00face Bo\u017esk\u00fa trojicu. \u2026. Pagan Roots of the Trinity Doctrine <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblicalunitarian.com\/articles\/pagan-roots-of-the-trinity-doctrine-ed-torrence-2002\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.biblicalunitarian.com\/articles\/pagan-roots-of-the-trinity-doctrine-ed-torrence-2002<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>Kniha: When Jesus Became God, The Struggle to Define Christianity During the Last Days of Rome <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblicalunitarian.com\/articles\/jesus-christ\/when-jesus-became-god\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.biblicalunitarian.com\/articles\/jesus-christ\/when-jesus-became-god<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>Reviewed Work: The Transmission of Sin: Augustine and the Pre-Augustinian Sources. (Religions in Translation) by Pier Franco Beatrice, Adam Kamesar. \u2026. University of Cambridge \u010dasopis <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/43665489\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/43665489<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul><ul>\r\n \t<li>docx <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/It_Turned_on_a_Word_Homoousis_and_the_Co.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/It_Turned_on_a_Word_Homoousis_and_the_Co.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>PDF <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/It_Turned_on_a_Word_Homoousis_and_the_Co.pdf\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/It_Turned_on_a_Word_Homoousis_and_the_Co.pdf<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>docx <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/It_Turned_on_a_Word_Homoousis_and_the_Coslovensky.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/It_Turned_on_a_Word_Homoousis_and_the_Co(slovensky.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/The_Word_Homoousios_from_Hellenism_to_Christianity_Beatrice_2002.pdf\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/The_Word_Homoousios_from_Hellenism_to_Christianity_Beatrice_2002.pdf<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>docx <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/The_Word_Homoousios_from_Hellenism_to_Christianity_Beatrice_2002_2.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/The_Word_Homoousios_from_Hellenism_to_Christianity_Beatrice_2002_2.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>docx <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/The_Word_Homoousios_from_Hellenism_to_Christianity_Beatrice_2002_slovensky.docx\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/The_Word_Homoousios_from_Hellenism_to_Christianity_Beatrice_2002_slovensky.docx<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul><strong>Moutafov Emmanuel, First Ecumenical Council of Nicaea, 325.<\/strong><br \/><br \/>Zauj\u00edmav\u00e1 pr\u00e1ca vedca. V pr\u00e1ci zd\u00f4raz\u0148uje, \u017ee koncil nebol ani tak ekumenick\u00fd ako dikt\u00e1torsk\u00fd zo strany cis\u00e1ra Kon\u0161tant\u00edna. Kon\u0161tant\u00edn naria\u010foval a \u00faloha biskupov bola posl\u00facha\u0165.<br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/First_Ecumenical_Council_of_Nicea_325.pdf\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/First_Ecumenical_Council_of_Nicea_325.pdf<\/a><br \/><br \/><strong>A.W. Tozer Theological Seminary &#8230;. NICENE TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY: REFUTING THE ETERNAL SUBORDINATION OF THE SON AND THE SPIRIT &#8230;.. Audrey E. McCormick<\/strong><br \/><br \/>Zauj\u00edmav\u00e1 diplomov\u00e1 pr\u00e1ca \u0161tudentky teol\u00f3gie. Spory o Bo\u017esk\u00fa trojicu neut\u00edchaj\u00fa ani dnes. V diplomovej pr\u00e1ci sa spom\u00edna, \u017ee v USA je ve\u013emi vplyvn\u00e1 teol\u00f3gia podriadenosti Syna a Ducha Sv\u00e4t\u00e9ho Otcovi. Dokonca autorka sa vyjadruje v kontexte, \u017ee sa jedn\u00e1 o v\u00e4\u010d\u0161inov\u00fa teol\u00f3giu (zrejme v Kalifornii a in\u00fdch \u0161t\u00e1toch USA. Dokonca cituje publik\u00e1cie teol\u00f3gov ktor\u00ed spochyb\u0148uj\u00fa teol\u00f3gov ktor\u00ed hl\u00e1saj\u00fa podriadenos\u0165 Syna a Ducha, \u010do nazna\u010duje, \u017ee tento teologick\u00fd spor m\u00e1 obrovsk\u00fd v\u00fdznam. Teol\u00f3gia hlavn\u00e9ho pr\u00fadu hovor\u00ed o rovnosti troch os\u00f4b v trojici. Faktom je to, \u017ee podriadenos\u0165 os\u00f4b je bli\u017e\u0161ie Biblick\u00e9mu u\u010deniu ako teol\u00f3gia hlavn\u00e9ho pr\u00fadu.<br \/><br \/>Moje pozn\u00e1mky: Ak d\u00e1me osob\u00e1m v trojici r\u00f4znu hierarchiu, potom sa posil\u0148uje argument, \u017ee kres\u0165anstvo nie je monoteizmus ale polyteizmus-pohanstvo. O adventistoch niektor\u00ed teol\u00f3govia hovoria, \u017ee s\u00fa polyteisti.<br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/NICENE_TRINITARIAN_THEOLOGY_REFUTING_THE.pdf\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/NICENE_TRINITARIAN_THEOLOGY_REFUTING_THE.pdf<\/a><br \/><br \/><strong>Formulation of the Doctrine of the Trinity in the Fourth Century \u2026.. Victor Beshir<\/strong><br \/><br \/>Zauj\u00edmav\u00e1 pr\u00e1ca s\u00edce ortodoxn\u00e9ho teol\u00f3ga. Ak si dobre pam\u00e4t\u00e1m, tak spom\u00ednal tam, \u017ee cirkevn\u00fd otec Bazil alebo Gregor ve\u013emi zd\u00f4raz\u0148oval, \u017ee Boh a Otec nie s\u00fa to ist\u00e9 a v \u017eiadnom pr\u00edpade ich netreba stoto\u017e\u0148ova\u0165, \u010do nazna\u010duje filozofiu, \u017ee je jeden Boh, ktor\u00e9mu s\u00fa hierarchicky podriaden\u00e9 osoby. To tie\u017e nie je v s\u00falade s teol\u00f3giou hlavn\u00e9ho pr\u00fadu.<br \/><br \/><h1><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Pojem_hypostaza\"><\/span><strong>Pojem hypost\u00e1za<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\u010eal\u0161\u00ed cirkevn\u00fd \u0161kand\u00e1l o t\u00e9me Bo\u017esk\u00e1 trojica. Pojem <strong>hypost\u00e1za<\/strong> pou\u017e\u00edvali teol\u00f3govia pre \u00fa\u010del ozna\u010denie osoby v trojici. Probl\u00e9m ale spo\u010d\u00edva v etymologickom v\u00fdzname tohto slova. Slovo bolo v gr\u00e9\u010dtine zn\u00e1me u\u017e stovky rokov dozadu ako existovalo kres\u0165anstvo. V\u00fdznam slova je jasn\u00fd. Predpona \u201ehypo-\u201c znamen\u00e1 v gr\u00e9\u010dtine \u201eni\u017e\u0161\u00ed\u201c \u201epodriaden\u00fd\u201c. Pojem hypost\u00e1za posil\u0148uje argument problematiky podriadenosti os\u00f4b v trojici. Ak\u00fa vieru mali prv\u00ed kres\u0165ania? Verili na 4 Bo\u017esk\u00e9 entity? Hierarchicky najvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed Boh, ktor\u00e9mu boli podriaden\u00e9 osoby\/hypost\u00e1zy? To by bolo v rozpore so s\u00fa\u010dasnou teol\u00f3giou hlavn\u00e9ho pr\u00fadu, av\u0161ak v s\u00falade s interpret\u00e1ciou Nickejsk\u00e9ho vyznania viery zostaven\u00fdm cis\u00e1rom Kon\u0161tant\u00ednom.<br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hypostasis_philosophy_and_religion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hypostasis_philosophy_and_religion<\/a><br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hypostatic_union\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hypostatic_union<\/a>\r\n<h1><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Kedy_vznikol_gnosticizmus\"><\/span><strong>Kedy vznikol gnosticizmus?<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>Trochu mimo hlavnej t\u00e9my, ale d\u00e1m to sem.<br \/><br \/>Ehrman prebral hoax teol\u00f3gov hlavn\u00e9ho pr\u00fadu, \u017ee gnosticiuzmus vznikol a\u017e v 2. storo\u010d\u00ed. Opomenul si v\u0161imn\u00fa\u0165 fakt, \u017ee j v Biblii m\u00e1me viacero gnostick\u00fdch prvkov.<br \/><br \/>Existuje viacero te\u00f3rii medzi vedcami:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>tradi\u010dn\u00ed teol\u00f3govia argumentuj\u00fa, \u017ee a\u017e od druh\u00e9ho storo\u010dia, aby oslabili argument, \u017ee s\u00e1m Kristus hl\u00e1sal gnostick\u00e9 u\u010denie<\/li>\r\n \t<li>\u010fal\u0161ia te\u00f3ria je \u017ee gnostick\u00e9 u\u010denie za\u010dal \u0161\u00edri\u0165 Kristus<\/li>\r\n \t<li>\u010fal\u0161ia te\u00f3ria \u017ee \u017ee gnosticizmus existoval e\u0161te pred Je\u017ei\u0161om a Je\u017ei\u0161 len spopularizoval toto u\u010denie<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nGnosticizmus bol silne in\u0161pirovan\u00fd hermetizmom, podobne ako aj kres\u0165anstvo hlavn\u00e9ho pr\u00fadu. rozdiel bol ale v tom, \u017ee k\u00fdm kres\u0165anstvo hlavn\u00e9ho pr\u00fadu si zobralo s hermetizmus len to najhor\u0161ie to jest polyteizmus, gnosticizmus si vybral s hermetizmu to najlep\u0161ie.\r\n<h1><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Vyucovanie_teologie_na_teologickej_fakulte_Cirkevna_historia\"><\/span><strong>Vyu\u010dovanie teol\u00f3gie na teologickej fakulte. Cirkevn\u00e1 hist\u00f3ria\r\n<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>kvalita v\u00fdu\u010dby teol\u00f3gie je \u0161peci\u00e1lne na slovensku extr\u00e9mne n\u00edzka nako\u013eko s\u00edce v\u00fdu\u010dbu plat\u00ed \u0161t\u00e1t so svojich pe\u0148az\u00ed ale o tom kto bude vyu\u010dova\u0165 teol\u00f3giu rozhoduje biskup. V\u00e4\u010d\u0161ina \u013eud\u00ed ktor\u00ed vyu\u010duj\u00fa na teologickej fakulte s\u00fa k\u0148azi alebo n\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00ed fanatici laici. Jedn\u00e1 sa o extr\u00e9mne zvr\u00e1ten\u00fa logiku v \u0161kolstve. Vych\u00e1dza to s vatik\u00e1nskej zmluvy. Tak obrovsk\u00fa moc ako m\u00e1 cirkev v s\u00fa\u010dastnosti, cirkev nemala sn\u00e1\u010f ani za monarchie. Katol\u00edci k\u0148azi po\u010das \u0161t\u00fadia nikdy ni\u010d kritick\u00e9 na cirkev nepo\u010duli. V \u0161t\u00e1toch kde je jasn\u00e1 odluka cirkvi od \u0161t\u00e1tu ako je USA alebo Franc\u00fazsko sa m\u00f4\u017ee sta\u0165, \u017ee teologick\u00e9 predmety vyu\u010duje bu\u010f liber\u00e1lny teol\u00f3g alebo sekul\u00e1rny \u010dlovek.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Najd\u00f4le\u017eitej\u0161\u00ed predmet teol\u00f3gie je hist\u00f3ria cirkvi, ktor\u00e1 sa v\u0161ak vyu\u010duje na teologickej fakulte extr\u00e9mne zmanipulovan\u00fdm sp\u00f4sobom. To, \u017ee do 5. storo\u010dia neexistovali in\u00ed teol\u00f3govia ako len brut\u00e1lni \u201ekac\u00edri\u201c zo poh\u013eadu s\u00fa\u010dasnej cirkvi sa \u00faplne zataji\u0165 ned\u00e1, av\u0161ak pri v\u00fdu\u010dbe teol\u00f3gie sa tieto veci \u010do najviac bagatelizuj\u00fa ako to len ide.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Z\u00e1klad kres\u0165anskej viery je postaven\u00fd na silnej manipul\u00e1cii a psychologickom zotro\u010den\u00ed \u010dloveka. Ke\u010f aj profesor teol\u00f3gie pozn\u00e1 kritick\u00e9 argumenty na adresu cirkvi, nepovie to svojim \u0161tudentom. Cel\u00e1 kres\u0165ansk\u00e1 viera je postaven\u00e1 len na extr\u00e9mne nekritickom poh\u013eade na cirkev cez ru\u017eov\u00e9 okuliare. Ni\u010d kritick\u00e9 neexistuje. Na\u0161a cirkev je predsa dokonal\u00e1, dokonal\u00e9 bo\u017eie dielo. \u2026\u2026.. Cirkevn\u00e1 mentalita je tak\u00e1 \u017ee men\u0161ie zlo je kry\u0165 pedofiln\u00e9 \u0161kand\u00e1ly, ako suspendova\u0165 pedofiln\u00e9ho k\u0148aza a poda\u0165 na\u0148 trestn\u00e9 ozn\u00e1menie, \u010do by po\u0161kodilo meno cirkvi. Z\u00e1klad je \u0161\u00edri\u0165 len dobr\u00e9 meno cirkvi. \u010co i len najmen\u0161ia kritika na vlastn\u00fa cirkev je nepr\u00edpustn\u00e1. T\u00e1to mentalita sa pren\u00e1\u0161a aj do v\u00fdu\u010dby teol\u00f3gie, \u017ee aj keby sa profesor teol\u00f3gie dozvedel pravdu o hist\u00f3rii cirkvi, neprezrad\u00ed to \u0161tudentom. \u2026\u2026\u2026. Tie\u017e profesori teol\u00f3gie sami \u017eij\u00fa mimo reality, v bubline, kedy sami \u010d\u00edtaj\u00fa len teol\u00f3giu vn\u00fatro cirkevn\u00fdch autorov a nemaj\u00fa povedomie o liber\u00e1lnych teol\u00f3goch alebo o sekul\u00e1rnych cirkevn\u00fdch historikoch. Sami sa udr\u017euj\u00fa v sebaklame.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Keby sa na teologickej fakulte vyu\u010dovala cel\u00e1 pravda o cirkvi, tak 99- \u0161tudentov, by k\u0148azmi nechceli by\u0165<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Menej_dolezita_a_menej_odporucana_literatura\"><\/span><strong>Menej d\u00f4le\u017eit\u00e1 a menej odpor\u00fa\u010dan\u00e1 literat\u00fara<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>Autor unit\u00e1rny, liber\u00e1lny teol\u00f3g, Andrews Norton 1786 1853<br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/catalog.hathitrust.org\/Record\/001961831\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/catalog.hathitrust.org\/Record\/001961831<\/a><br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Andrews_Norton\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Andrews_Norton<\/a><br \/><br \/>Autor sk\u00f4r konzervat\u00edvny teol\u00f3g, s kritick\u00fdm poh\u013eadom na bo\u017esk\u00fa trojicu<br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianbook.com\/short-history-of-the-early-church\/harry-boer\/9780802813398\/pd\/2813399\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.christianbook.com\/short-history-of-the-early-church\/harry-boer\/9780802813398\/pd\/2813399<\/a><br \/><br \/>Netrinit\u00e1rny teol\u00f3g<br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Adolf_von_Harnack\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Adolf_von_Harnack<\/a><br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/historydogma01speigoog\/page\/n8\/mode\/2up\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/historydogma01speigoog\/page\/n8\/mode\/2up<\/a><br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/History-Dogma-Adolf-Harnack\/dp\/1579100678\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/History-Dogma-Adolf-Harnack\/dp\/1579100678<\/a><br \/><br \/>Recenzia na knihu podobn\u00fa autorovi Ehrmanovi<br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/journals\/journal-of-ecclesiastical-history\/article\/abs\/formation-of-christian-dogma-an-historical-study-of-its-problem-by-martin-werner-translated-with-an-introduction-by-s-g-f-brandon-pp-xvi-352-london-adam-charles-black-1957-30s\/A8E59905C37A0DFC39D58A773D7C60F8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/journals\/journal-of-ecclesiastical-history\/article\/abs\/formation-of-christian-dogma-an-historical-study-of-its-problem-by-martin-werner-translated-with-an-introduction-by-s-g-f-brandon-pp-xvi-352-london-adam-charles-black-1957-30s\/A8E59905C37A0DFC39D58A773D7C60F8<\/a><br \/><br \/>Philip Schaff <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/History-Christian-Church-Christianity-D\/dp\/1520584636\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/History-Christian-Church-Christianity-D\/dp\/1520584636\/<\/a><br \/><br \/>Konzervat\u00edvny netrinit\u00e1rny teol\u00f3g autor <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philip_Schaff\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philip_Schaff<\/a><br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/docplayer.cz\/40110473-Dejiny-dogmatu-navrat-domu.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/docplayer.cz\/40110473-Dejiny-dogmatu-navrat-domu.html<\/a><br \/><br \/>Konzervat\u00edvny netrinit\u00e1rny teol\u00f3g autor <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Louis_Berkhof\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Louis_Berkhof<\/a><br \/><br \/>Unit\u00e1ri, ktor\u00ed pova\u017euj\u00fa Bibliu za neomyln\u00e9 zjavenie. N\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00ed fanatici, ale niektor\u00e9 argumenty m\u00f4\u017eu ma\u0165 dobr\u00e9 ako sa kres\u0165anstvo hlavn\u00e9ho pr\u00fadu neriadi Bibliou. Knihy prelo\u017een\u00e9 dokonca aj do \u010de\u0161tiny<br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/focusonthekingdom.org\/books\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/focusonthekingdom.org\/books\/<\/a><br \/><br \/>https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sir_Anthony_Buzzard-2C_3rd_Baronet<br \/><br \/>reakcia recenzia <a href=\"http:\/\/silverwarethief.com\/datafiles\/text\/paulandlorriane.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/silverwarethief.com\/datafiles\/text\/paulandlorriane.pdf<\/a><br \/><br \/>Konzervat\u00edvni unit\u00e1ri, ktor\u00ed pova\u017euj\u00fa Bibliu za neomyln\u00e9 zjavenie.. Reformovan\u00e1 cirkev 21. storo\u010dia<br \/><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/21stcr.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/21stcr.org<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Autor Bart D. Ehrman jeho diela. V\u00fdznamn\u00fd kritik kres\u0165anstva PDF s\u00fabory v \u010de\u0161tine s\u00fa prelo\u017een\u00e9 nezn\u00e1mym prekladate\u013eom. Preklady som na\u0161iel na uloz.to S\u00fa tu zverejnen\u00e9 rovnak\u00e9 knihy do viacero form\u00e1tov a jazykov. Docx s\u00fabory v sloven\u010dine a \u010de\u0161tine boli prelo\u017een\u00e9 strojovo https:\/\/translate.google.com\/?sl=auto&amp;tl=sk&amp;op=docs V pr\u00edpade \u017ee tu nen\u00e1jdete form\u00e1t ktor\u00fd potrebujete, nie je probl\u00e9m prekonvertova\u0165 epub &#8230; <a title=\"Autor Bart D. Ehrman jeho diela. V\u00fdznamn\u00fd kritik kres\u0165anstva. \u010eal\u0161ie vedeck\u00e9 pr\u00e1ce spochyb\u0148uj\u00face kres\u0165anstvo\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/autor-bart-d-ehrman-jeho-diela-vyznamny-kritik-krestanstva\/\" aria-label=\"Pre\u010d\u00edtajte si viac o Autor Bart D. Ehrman jeho diela. V\u00fdznamn\u00fd kritik kres\u0165anstva. \u010eal\u0161ie vedeck\u00e9 pr\u00e1ce spochyb\u0148uj\u00face kres\u0165anstvo\">\u010c\u00edta\u0165 viac<\/a>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2283","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-krestanstvo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2283","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2283"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2283\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2283"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2283"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2283"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}