{"id":2132,"date":"2017-03-31T21:02:48","date_gmt":"2017-03-31T19:02:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/2017\/03\/31\/jezis-nebol-zid-ale-europan-velmi-seriozna-teoria-patranie-po-jezisovom-povode\/"},"modified":"2026-02-01T14:20:41","modified_gmt":"2026-02-01T13:20:41","slug":"jezis-nebol-zid-ale-europan-velmi-seriozna-teoria-patranie-po-jezisovom-povode","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/jezis-nebol-zid-ale-europan-velmi-seriozna-teoria-patranie-po-jezisovom-povode\/","title":{"rendered":"Je\u017ei\u0161 nebol \u017did ale Eur\u00f3pan. Ve\u013emi seri\u00f3zna te\u00f3ria. P\u00e1tranie po Je\u017ei\u0161ovom p\u00f4vode"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>V\u0161etko m\u00f4\u017ee by\u0165 \u00faplne inak ako si mysl\u00ed v\u00e4\u010d\u0161ina \u013eud\u00ed. Na podporu te\u00f3rie, \u017ee Je\u017ei\u0161 m\u00e1 Eur\u00f3psky p\u00f4vod existuj\u00fa ve\u013emi seri\u00f3zne argumenty a fakty.<br \/><br \/>Ke\u010f chcem poveda\u0165, \u017ee Je\u017ei\u0161 nebol etnick\u00fd \u017did, mus\u00edme najprv jasne zadefinova\u0165 kto s\u00fa to vlastne \u017didia. So \u017didmi je pravda trochu in\u00e1 ako si to predstavuje v\u00e4\u010d\u0161ina \u013eud\u00ed. Pre pochopenie tohto \u010dl\u00e1nku je nevyhnutn\u00e9 si pre\u010d\u00edta\u0165 tento odkaz: <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><em>Skuto\u010dn\u00fd p\u00f4vod \u017didov<\/em><\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/skutocny-povod-zidov\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/skutocny-povod-zidov<\/a><br \/><br \/>Na prv\u00fd poh\u013ead sa m\u00f4\u017ee zda\u0165 Eur\u00f3psky p\u00f4vod Krista ako \u0161ialen\u00e1 my\u0161lienka. Av\u0161ak onedlho V\u00e1m to za\u010dne by\u0165 jasn\u00e9:\n<br \/>Za Je\u017ei\u0161ov\u00fdch \u010dasov R\u00edmska r\u00ed\u0161a mala najv\u00e4\u010d\u0161\u00ed rozmachu a ovl\u00e1dala najv\u00e4\u010d\u0161iu ploch\u00fa \u00fazemia v hist\u00f3rii svojej existencie. Medzi ovl\u00e1dan\u00e9 \u00fazemie R\u00edmskej r\u00ed\u0161e patrila aj Judea, \u00fazemie s\u00fa\u010dasnej Palest\u00edny a Izraela. Existuj\u00fa dve ve\u013emi pravdepodobn\u00e9 verzie p\u00f4vodu Je\u017ei\u0161a. Je\u017ei\u0161 mal \u010dist\u00fd Eur\u00f3psky p\u00f4vod: bol nechcen\u00e9 die\u0165a R\u00edmskeho vojensk\u00e9ho d\u00f4stojn\u00edka (stotn\u00edka) a jeho man\u017eelky. Die\u0165a bolo vyhoden\u00e9 na ulicu a M\u00e1ria si ho zobrala a za\u010dala na verejnosti prehlasova\u0165, \u017ee je to jej die\u0165a, ktor\u00e9 splodila s Jozefom. Treba si uvedomi\u0165, \u017ee vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed vojensk\u00ed R\u00edmski d\u00f4stojn\u00edci si do Judei mohli vzia\u0165 aj man\u017eelku (napr. aj v Biblii sa spom\u00edna, \u017ee Poncius Pil\u00e1t mal so sebou svoju man\u017eelku).<br \/><br \/><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">T\u00fato te\u00f3riu podporuje viacero faktov:<\/span>\n<br \/>-p\u00f4vod Je\u017ei\u0161a je ve\u013emi kontroverzn\u00e1 t\u00e9ma aj v samotnej cirkvi. Kres\u0165ania argumentuj\u00fa, \u017ee Je\u017ei\u0161 bol panensky sploden\u00fd nadprirodzene s Ducha Sv\u00e4t\u00e9ho. T\u00e1to verzia je na \u00farovni rozpr\u00e1vky pre deti do 5 rokov\n<br \/>-faktom je to, \u017ee cirkev kv\u00f4li p\u00f4vodu Je\u017ei\u0161a dokonca za\u0161la a\u017e tak \u010faleko, \u017ee sfal\u0161ovala preklady Biblie a to potvrdzuj\u00fa aj odborn\u00edci v oblasti prekladov starogr\u00e9\u010dtiny. Cirkev si prisp\u00f4sobila Bibliu svojim dogm\u00e1m. Viac na tomto odkaze: <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/pocatie-jezisa-z-ducha-svaeteho-a-panenstvo-marie\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/pocatie-jezisa-z-ducha-svaeteho-a-panenstvo-marie<\/a>\n<br \/>-samotn\u00ed kres\u0165ania zn\u00e1zor\u0148uj\u00fa Je\u017ei\u0161a ako belocha, ako \u010dloveka Eur\u00f3pskeho vzh\u013eadu\n<br \/>-ist\u00fd zn\u00e1my \u0161amansk\u00fd u\u010denec a \u0161amani svoj\u00edmi jasnovidn\u00fdmi schopnos\u0165ami tie\u017e pova\u017euj\u00fa Je\u017ei\u0161a za belocha eur\u00f3pskeho vzh\u013eadu<br \/><br \/><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Druh\u00e1 verzia: Je\u017ei\u0161 ako polovi\u010dn\u00fd Eur\u00f3pan<\/span>\n<br \/>Argumenty pre podporu tejto te\u00f3rie s\u00fa dos\u0165 siln\u00e9:<br \/><br \/>-Gr\u00e9cky filozof Celsus vo svojom diele z roku 177 naz\u00fdva Je\u017ei\u0161a ako syna prostit\u00fatky. T\u00fato vec nemo\u017eno bra\u0165 na \u013eahk\u00fa v\u00e1hu. Celsus to v\u00f4bec nemusel myslie\u0165 so srandy ani s ir\u00f3niou. Tento \u010dlovek si mohol pam\u00e4ta\u0165 mnoho autentick\u00fdch svedectiev s \u00fastneho podania. Dielo Celsusa je star\u0161ie ako Biblia preto je viac d\u00f4veryhodn\u00e9 ako Biblia. M\u00e1ria s d\u00f4vodu zlej finan\u010dnej situ\u00e1cie k\u013eudne mohla robi\u0165 prostit\u00fatku s nejak\u00fdm R\u00edmskym vojensk\u00fdm d\u00f4stojn\u00edkom. Je\u017ei\u0161 mohlo by\u0165 die\u0165a sploden\u00e9 s prostit\u00facie s R\u00edmskym vojakom. Viac na tomto odkaze <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/protikrestansky-filozof-celsus-o-prvych-krestanoch-su-to-upadkovi-primitivi\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/protikrestansky-filozof-celsus-o-prvych-krestanoch-su-to-upadkovi-primitivi<\/a>\n<br \/>-v jednom nekanonickom apokryfnom evanjeliu (ktor\u00e9 cirkev neuzn\u00e1va) sa p\u00ed\u0161e zauj\u00edmav\u00e1 vec: ke\u010f Poncius Pil\u00e1t vy\u0161etroval \u017ealobu farizejov na ukri\u017eovanie Je\u017ei\u0161a a vypo\u010d\u00faval ich, farizeji hovorili o Je\u017ei\u0161ovi, \u017ee je sploden\u00fd so smilstva. D\u00f4vod bol bezpochyby ve\u013emi jednoduch\u00fd: nako\u013eko mal Je\u017ei\u0161 bled\u00fa poko\u017eku, bled\u00e9 vlasy a modr\u00e9 alebo zelen\u00e9 o\u010di, logicky to v \u013eu\u010foch vyvol\u00e1valo pochybnosti, \u010di je Je\u017ei\u0161 M\u00e1riin a Jozefov syn. \u017dia\u013e \u010d\u00edtal som toto apokryfn\u00e9 evanjelium u\u017e ve\u013emi d\u00e1vno a nepam\u00e4t\u00e1m si jeho presn\u00fd n\u00e1zov \u2013 je to \u010dasovo ve\u013emi n\u00e1ro\u010dn\u00e9 to znovu vyh\u013eada\u0165<br \/><br \/><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>S\u00favisiace \u010dl\u00e1nky<\/strong><\/span>\n<br \/>Ofici\u00e1lny jazyk Izraela hebrej\u010dina je syntetick\u00fd jazyk <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/oficialny-jazyk-izraela-neo-hebrejcina-je-synteticky-jazyk\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/oficialny-jazyk-izraela-neo-hebrejcina-je-synteticky-jazyk<\/a>\n<br \/>Skuto\u010dn\u00fd p\u00f4vod \u017didov <a href=\"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/skutocny-povod-zidov\">https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/skutocny-povod-zidov<\/a><strong><br \/><\/strong><br \/><br \/><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":". Medzi ovl\u00e1dan\u00e9 \u00fazemie R\u00edmskej r\u00ed\u0161e patrila aj Judea, \u00fazemie s\u00fa\u010dasnej Palest\u00edny a Izraela. Existuj\u00fa dve ve\u013emi pravdepodobn\u00e9 verzie p\u00f4vodu Je\u017ei\u0161a. Je\u017ei\u0161 mal \u010dist\u00fd Eur\u00f3psky p\u00f4vod: bol nechcen\u00e9 die\u0165a R\u00edmskeho vojensk\u00e9ho d\u00f4stojn\u00edka (stotn\u00edka) a jeho man\u017eelky. Die\u0165a bolo vyhoden\u00e9 na ulicu a M\u00e1ria si ho zobrala a za\u010dala na verejnosti prehlasova\u0165, \u017ee je to jej die\u0165a, ktor\u00e9 splodila s Jozefom. Treba si uvedomi\u0165, \u017ee vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed vojensk\u00ed R\u00edmski d\u00f4stojn\u00edci si do Judei mohli vzia\u0165 aj man\u017eelku (napr. aj v Biblii sa spom\u00edna, \u017ee Poncius Pil\u00e1t mal so sebou svoju man\u017eelku).","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2132","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-krestanstvo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2132","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2132"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2132\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2132"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2132"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2132"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}