{"id":2079,"date":"2016-03-15T14:51:45","date_gmt":"2016-03-15T13:51:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/2016\/03\/15\/protikrestansky-filozof-celsus-o-prvych-krestanoch-su-to-upadkovi-primitivi\/"},"modified":"2026-02-02T13:56:31","modified_gmt":"2026-02-02T12:56:31","slug":"protikrestansky-filozof-celsus-o-prvych-krestanoch-su-to-upadkovi-primitivi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/sk\/protikrestansky-filozof-celsus-o-prvych-krestanoch-su-to-upadkovi-primitivi\/","title":{"rendered":"Gr\u00e9cky filozof Celsus o prv\u00fdch kres\u0165anoch: s\u00fa to nemor\u00e1lni primit\u00edvi a spodina spolo\u010dnosti"},"content":{"rendered":"
\r\n
\"Kres\u0165anstvo(humorn\u00e1 ilustra\u010dn\u00e1 fotografia) Celsus: protikres\u0165ansk\u00fd filozof autor z roku 177 https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Celsus<\/a> Celsus bol gr\u00e9cky filozof, ktor\u00e9ho dielo kritizuj\u00face kres\u0165anov bolo nap\u00edsan\u00e9 v roku 177. Jeho dielo v angli\u010dtine si m\u00f4\u017eete pozrie\u0165 tu: https:\/\/www.gutenberg.org\/ebooks\/37696?msg=welcome_stranger<\/a> https:\/\/www.gutenberg.org\/files\/37696\/37696-h\/37696-h.htm<\/a>\r\n
Celsusove v\u00fdroky s\u00fa len asi 1\/4 tejto knihy. Ak by to nejak\u00fd dobrovo\u013en\u00edk bol ochotn\u00fd prelo\u017ei\u0165 jeho dielo do sloven\u010diny alebo \u010de\u0161tiny, budem ve\u013emi r\u00e1d.\r\n\r\n

\r\nLogicky ak m\u00e1 \u010dlovek zmysel pre objektivitu a pravdu, mal by si vypo\u010du\u0165 aj druh\u00fa kritick\u00fa stranu ku kres\u0165anstvu. T\u00fdch argumentov, ktor\u00e9 len obhajuj\u00fa kres\u0165anstvo, sme u\u017e po\u010duli dos\u0165 a to zo strany cirkvi. Celsus je omnoho viac d\u00f4veryhodnej\u0161\u00ed a hodnovernej\u0161\u00ed \u010dlovek \u010do sa t\u00fdka kres\u0165anstva ako cirkev, ktor\u00e1 v minulosti vedome klamala veriacich a klame doteraz. Celsus je objekt\u00edvny, nez\u00e1visl\u00fd a nezaujat\u00fd \u010dlovek, ktor\u00fd komentuje vtedaj\u0161\u00edch kres\u0165anov a ozna\u010duje ich ako symbol \u00fapadku a \u00fabohosti.<\/span>
\r\n
\r\nStru\u010dn\u00fd obsah jeho diela:<\/span><\/span> -Celsus pova\u017euje kres\u0165anov na naprost\u00fa \u00fabohu primit\u00edvnu nevzdelan\u00fa, naivn\u00fa spodinu spolo\u010dnosti, za divn\u00fdch a psychicky zakomplexovan\u00fdch \u010dud\u00e1kov, ktor\u00ed s\u00fa psychicky na dne. Kres\u0165anov pova\u017euje za hlup\u00e1kov, ktor\u00ed s\u00fa schopn\u00ed nekriticky veri\u0165 na najabsurdnej\u0161ie hl\u00faposti (n\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00e9 dogmy) -\u017eiaden vzdelan\u00fd \u010dlovek sa medzi kres\u0165anmi nena\u0161iel – ten by nebol schopn\u00fd naivne veri\u0165 na hl\u00faposti -Celsus hovor\u00ed o presne rovnak\u00fdch praktik\u00e1ch prv\u00fdch kres\u0165anov ako sa aj robia v s\u00fa\u010dasn\u00fdch sekt\u00e1ch (ako napr. ned\u00e1vno zaniknut\u00e9 hnutie Nazaret alebo KS Milos\u0165): \u010dlenovia sekty s\u00fa vodcami sekty n\u00faten\u00ed aby sa \u010do najviac izolovali a preru\u0161ili kontakty so svojimi rodi\u010dmi \u010di pr\u00edbuzn\u00fdmi. Tak je mo\u017en\u00e9 omnoho \u013eah\u0161ie zmanipulova\u0165 \u013eud\u00ed, ak ich izolujete a omnoho \u013eah\u0161ie v\u00e1m bud\u00fa veri\u0165 na absurdn\u00e9 hl\u00faposti
\r\n
\r\n
-Celsus ozna\u010duje kres\u0165anov ako \u00fapadkov\u00fdch neetick\u00fdch a nemor\u00e1lnych \u010dud\u00e1kov -hovor\u00ed, \u017ee na kres\u0165anstvo najlep\u0161ie naleteli preva\u017ene len naivn\u00e9 deti a \u017eeny -upozor\u0148uje aj na fal\u0161ovan\u00e9 z\u00e1zraky vo vtedaj\u0161\u00edch kres\u0165ansk\u00fdch komunit\u00e1ch: viera v cirkevn\u00e9 z\u00e1zraky bol z\u00e1klad viery vtedaj\u0161\u00edch kres\u0165anov. Celsus sa k tomu stavia len skepticky a hovor\u00ed, \u017ee ide len o k\u00fazeln\u00e9 triky, ktor\u00fdm m\u00f4\u017eu naletie\u0165 len ve\u013emi primit\u00edvni a naivn\u00ed \u013eudia -kres\u0165anov popisuje ako zlodejov, lupi\u010dov a vykr\u00e1da\u010dov hrobov -Rimania, vl\u00e1da R\u00edmskeho cis\u00e1ra bola \u010do do slobody vierovyznania v tom \u010dase slobodn\u00e1 – kres\u0165ania si mohli slobodne vyzn\u00e1va\u0165 vieru. Av\u0161ak kres\u0165ania mali okrem verejn\u00fdch stret\u00e1van\u00ed aj tajn\u00e9 no\u010dn\u00e9 stret\u00e1vania, \u010do bolo pod\u013ea R\u00edmskych z\u00e1konov ileg\u00e1lne. To bol aj d\u00f4vod ich prenasledovania. N\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00e9 obrady robili kres\u0165ania \u010dasto aj v hroboch -Je\u017ei\u0161 bol pod\u013ea Celsia neman\u017eelsk\u00fd M\u00e1riin syn, ktor\u00e9ho splodila s R\u00edmskym vojakom (mimochodom v minulosti som \u010d\u00edtal nejak\u00e9 gnostick\u00e9 evanjelium\/apokryf, kde pri vy\u0161etrovan\u00ed pred Pil\u00e1tom farizeji tie\u017e kritizovali Je\u017ei\u0161a, \u017ee bol sploden\u00fd zo smilstva. \u017dia\u013e je to \u010dasovo n\u00e1ro\u010dn\u00e9, aby som to znovu vyh\u013eadal presne v ktorom apokryfe sa to p\u00ed\u0161e. Zauj\u00edmav\u00e9, \u017ee dve nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 zdroje inform\u00e1cii potvrdzuj\u00fa to ist\u00e9. Tie\u017e je zrejm\u00e9, \u017ee Je\u017ei\u0161 sa od ostatn\u00fdch l\u00ed\u0161il aj svoj\u00edm vzh\u013eadom – vlasy a poko\u017eku mal bled\u0161iu ako jeho rovesn\u00edci, preto\u017ee etnicky bol len polovi\u010dn\u00fd Semita\/Arab)<\/span> -Je\u017ei\u0161 \u017eil pod\u013ea Celsia dlh\u00fd \u010das svojho \u017eivota v Egypte, kde sa nau\u010dil m\u00e1gii. A svojimi magick\u00fdmi schopnos\u0165ami vedel ohurova\u0165 druh\u00fdch \u013eud\u00ed -Celsius je ve\u013emi skeptick\u00fd k hodnovernosti Je\u017ei\u0161ov\u00fdch z\u00e1zrakov – ozna\u010duje to len ako v\u00fdmysly kres\u0165anov a upozor\u0148uje, \u017ee neexistuj\u00fa \u017eiadne nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 (in\u00e9 ako kres\u0165ansk\u00e9) zdroje inform\u00e1cii, ktor\u00e9 by ve\u013ek\u00e9 Je\u017ei\u0161ove z\u00e1zraky potvrdzovali -Celsus hovor\u00ed \u017ee kres\u0165ania s\u00fa rozdroben\u00fd na viacero siekt, ktor\u00e9 maj\u00fa medzi sebou nemal\u00e9 konflikty, kto z nich je ten “prav\u00fd”<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Celsus bol gr\u00e9cky filozof, ktor\u00e9ho dielo kritizuj\u00face kres\u0165anov bolo nap\u00edsan\u00e9 v roku 177.","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2079","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-krestanstvo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2079"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2079\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filozofia.nett.to\/krestanstvo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}