Philosophical criticism of Christianity and religion

A fascinating connection. South American shamans claim that there are negative alien civilizations that need blood. The Bible also speaks of beings that need blood. How does this whole topic relate to the chupacabra phenomenon? Chupacabras are strange animals that kill and drink the blood of farm animals under mysterious circumstances.

In this article, I will refer exclusively to serious academic historical facts in an effort to reconstruct history as objectively as possible. I have already written articles on the topic of the Christianization of the Slavs and Europe in the past, but this article will be written from a completely different perspective. It will contain entirely new information. Why did Christianity prevail despite the fact that nobody wanted it?

First of all, it is necessary to clearly separate facts from myths. While Christians argue that Slavic spirituality was a polytheistic belief in multiple gods, a belief where wooden idols were worshipped, serious scientific facts say otherwise. The truth is that the spirituality of the Slavs was very advanced, they did not believe in any idols, they did not worship multiple gods similar to the Roman and Greek religions. Most historians, ethnologists, and archaeologists are of a similar opinion.

Because God wants it and God must be obeyed (Christians have fallen for a false image of God that is not real). Fear of death. By falling for the Christian idea of the afterlife, heaven, hell, and purgatory, people are most motivated by the fear of how they will fare after death. The fear of death strongly motivates people to live very active religious lives. Christian funeral rites strongly reinforce people's motivation to fear death and believe in the Christian view of the afterlife.

Religion invokes the concept of "God". What happens after death? Christianity means tuning into negative energies. Why doesn't psychology question religion? Lack of activists to spread awareness about Christianity. Does religion really make a person better? Can the Catholic Church reform itself?

The Church as an instrument of political power and the Council of Nicaea. The Pope did not attend the Council. The pagan element of the generation of gods in the Nicene Creed. … They concealed pagan elements: a bad translation of the Nicene Creed into Slovak and Czech. The First Council of Constantinople: Jesus as not fully God. A bold theory: did Christians really believe in one God? Or did they believe in multiple gods? The Church as an instrument of political power – historical development after Emperor Constantine and Theodosius. Primacy / primacy of the Roman bishop.

Furthermore, young people are promised how wonderfully and beautifully their lives will change for the better, how wonderfully they will be "reborn", "transformed" and "awakened" if they turn to religious fanaticism. I ask: how can a young person defend themselves against this sectarian manipulation when no one has told them that it is an insidious sectarian manipulative action? Who warns young people not to become victims of these fanatical Christian sects? After all, there is no one to warn them. Sects exploit the disorientation and lack of information of young people.

The path to "God" does not lead through the church. The original Amazonian shamans perceive the religious idea of God as an egregore – an energy cluster created by people themselves. They consider tuning into the Christian religious idea of God to be something bad. People have good intentions to seek God in the Christian community, in the church, in the church – that in itself is nice – but the harsh truth is that fanatical Christian communities and the church have nothing to do with true spirituality.

By principle, a person is a free being. Sometimes, however, they can lose their freedom very quickly. This is especially true in Christian communities. There is a very thin line between religion and a sect. The path to "God" does not lead through the church. And once a person enters a Christian community, they are practically unable to leave, because they have completely lost their freedom. In this case, a person is very vulnerable and very fragile. The person in question may think of themselves as free, but in reality, this is not the case.

Anyone who does not get drawn into the hateful propaganda of alternative media, who tries to have positive thoughts, who tries to be an optimist, a positivist, who wishes success to others, who radiates love for others, who, despite a life full of suffering (e.g., a bad financial situation), does not curse politicians, does not blame others for their failure but humbly endures suffering, who has not been drawn into the manipulation of religion, serves the good.