Lately, I have been focusing on the topic of alternative media on this site, but I haven't written anything about Christianity for a long time. So now here is an article about Christianity.
This article is quite long. Take enough time for it, make yourself comfortable and read :).
Religion uses the term "God"
The most insidious lie of Christianity is that it brandishes the term "God". To a certain extent, we must understand that Christians have fallen victim to religion because they have fallen for a very sophisticated lie that the church has been successfully deceiving people with for thousands of years. Yes, it is true that God exists, but the real God is radically different from the religious concept of "God". The Christian concept of "God" is a parody of the real God – it is something incredibly primitive. Human stupidity is fascinating, that people fall for the church so stupidly just because it brandishes the term "God". No one realizes that the religious concept of "God" is just a pathetic fantasy.
Human stupidity is very sad, as the vast majority of people still believe that either God does not exist, or if he does, he is a primitive religious Christian idea of "God" – the Holy Trinity. Why don't people realize that there may be a third truth? Why do people think that only one of these two options can be true? Why are people so stupid?
Has any Christian ever asked themselves whether the true God might be something other than the Christian conception?
The current era, the last 5 years, is a time when the number of active members of the church is rapidly increasing. It is very important to spread awareness among people so that they wake up, learn to think, and become familiar with the aforementioned things.
I will focus more on this topic in this article: Why religion and the church are not the way to God? Religious idea of God vs. the real "God" https://filozofia.nett.to/krestanstvo/sk/preco-nabozenstvo-a-cirkev-nie-je-cesta-k-bohu-nabozenska-predstava-boha-vs-skutocny-boh
What will happen after death?
In countries with Christian culture, such as Europe and North and South America, 99% of people believe that after a person's death, what Christian or materialistic philosophy says will happen (Christian heaven, hell, purgatory vs. materialistic complete annihilation of a person, as it is based on the premise that a person has no soul). Why are people so stupid? Why are people so herd-like? Why don't people realize that neither option may be true? That there might be a third option? Why don't people realize that there might also be a shamanic worldview?
After physical death, Christians will be extremely sad and frustrated that it looks completely different after death than they imagined. They will realize that religious dogmas were completely useless to them, that they will not be rewarded for how many times they attended religious ceremonies, and they will be very disappointed that they believed in a false image of God.
A Christian did not choose Christianity freely. Manipulative programs of religion
I write more about this topic here: Egregors – the basis of religion – collective manipulative thought field https://filozofia.nett.to/krestanstvo/sk/egregory-zaklad-nabozenstva-kolektivne-manipulativne-myslienkove-pole
The most fundamental thing a Christian should hear about Christianity is that religion is an egregore – a manipulative energy program that completely controls a person and makes them unfree. Has any Christian ever considered that they did not choose Christianity through free will? Has any Christian considered that they became a Christian against their free will? Does a Christian realize that religious energy programs make them unfree? Such questions should be asked to Christians very often. Although Christians, under the influence of manipulative programs, think they are free, the opposite is true – appearances are deceiving, and that is the insidious thing about religion.
As a former fanatical Christian, not from theory but from real practice, I say that the manipulative programs of religion are very strong and give a person a seeming sense of freedom. I am personally convinced that a person does not decide for Christianity freely but under the influence of manipulative programs.
Baptism and understanding Christianity: Christians claim that not everyone has the gift of faith, that not everyone has the gift of understanding Christianity. Let's stop at the word "understand" because it is very important. "The gift of faith" or "understanding Christianity" means nothing other than being under the influence of the manipulative energy programs of religion. When a person is under the influence of manipulation, it is clear to them that they better understand absurd religious nonsense. The manipulative program that is in a person, similar to a virus in a computer, is energetically connected to the egregore of religion.
During baptism, a manipulative energy program is inserted into the child (who still has a very weak aura and weak protective energy mechanisms) by the priest, which will influence the child's thinking for the rest of their life. The child is baptized as soon as possible after birth – that is the tradition. Although there is no guarantee that every baptized person will be a fanatical or active Christian, it is certain that the person's way of thinking will be more Christian, more connected to the Christian egregore than an unbaptized person, and they will "understand" Christianity more.
We can imagine the brain of a Christian as a brain that is attacked by intelligent bacteria or viruses that can influence a person's thinking, but with the difference that everything is at the energy level.
Believing in the crazy Christian idea of God must have been too much even for the polytheistic pagan Romans and Greeks. Christianity in the Roman Empire must have been imposed on society by very violent means, because no one would voluntarily want to believe in such madness. History is written by the victors, and 95% of the church's crimes have been erased from historical written sources. It is hard to imagine how much blood must have flowed for Christianity to prevail.
Religion is a non-material addiction. Christianity is a form of drug addiction.
Official psychology recognizes that there is a non-substance addiction to sects/cults. This is at least something, but non-substance addiction should also be extended to all religions. We will have to wait a while for such progress in psychology.
The psychological term "non-substance addiction" is very accurate – yes, religion is a drug. Religion destroys people, and yet people are enslaved by religion. There is also a withdrawal syndrome for religion. I know religious fanatics who would go completely insane psychologically and suffer from severe depression if they even thought about not attending religious ceremonies for a longer period. It is very sad to look at such psychological wrecks – completely destroyed people.
Christians are crazy: we can compare them to smokers who buy packs of cigarettes with their own money and, with "good intentions," force cigarettes into the mouths of everyone around them and light them, saying that cigarettes are a cure for everything, that cigarettes are the best thing for everything. This is a figurative comparison to Christian evangelization – spreading their faith – spreading religious drug addiction.
A Christian parent can be compared to a smoker who forces their children to smoke cigarettes.
The healing method of Christianity from the disease
It is possible to cure believers of the disease of Christianity on two levels:
a) a Christian fully gets rid of religion
b) a Christian will still be enslaved by religion even after therapy, but at least they will come to realize the following:
– "Christianity is harming me, and I realize that I am addicted to it."
– "I realize that I am enslaving myself to religion against my will"
– "I perceive Christianity as a harmful thing that I will not spread further and will not impose on my children, but on the contrary, I will protect my children from it in the same way that a smoker protects children from cigarette smoke"
A Christian should understand that religion is certainly not something to be proud of, but on the contrary, they should realize that it is the greatest weakness.
In discussions with Christians, I realize that it is much easier for a Christian to realize that religion is a harmful drug than to completely renounce it.
Therapeutic method
A very effective therapeutic method may consist of a Christian making a resolution to contemplate/reflect for at least 2 minutes every day on the following questions: "Did I really freely decide to profess my religion? Or am I just running on manipulative energy programs? What causes my faith? A free decision or a strongly manipulative energy program of religion?".
With every prayer, a Christian should ask themselves: "What God am I actually tuning into? The real God or just an egregore – human ideas – an energy cluster created by people?"
Every Christian will wake up after asking these questions and realize how they were manipulated and deceived if they ask these questions at least 50 times and think/meditate on these questions for at least 2 minutes each time.
*******************************
Throughout this website, I explain that Christianity means believing that 1+1=4. Many Christians are so strongly enslaved by the manipulative energy programs of religion that even after reading this page, they will still believe the insane nonsense of religion, that 1+1=4. Religious fanatics are pathetic human wrecks.
Christianity means tuning into negative energies
The most accurate definition of Christianity is that it is a religion of tuning into negative energies. The central theme of Christianity is God. But what does a Christian imagine when they think of God? A suffering Christ on the cross. If a Christian tunes into the Christian idea of God, they tune into negative energy.
Cleansing oneself of negative energies is a good thing. Negative energies are, in Christian terminology, the sin of sins. But how do Christians cleanse themselves of sins? Through the blood and suffering of Jesus Christ – that is, through negative energy. It is not possible to cleanse oneself of negative energy with negative energy. Christianity has no element within it that would allow one to cleanse oneself of negative energy.
What does a Christian imagine when they think of God? A helpless corpse on a cross. How can Christians believe in a corpse and call it God? Isn't that primitive?
the idea of God, it will tune into negative energy.
Although Christians say they have love for Christ, in reality, Christianity dishonors Christ the most by depicting him as a corpse on the cross.
Why doesn't psychology question religion?
The reason is very simple. Psychology is the most stagnant science among all sciences. While all other scientific fields such as neurology, pharmacology, medicine, IT technologies, and technical fields have moved radically forward in the last 60 years, psychology has practically not moved from its place and is treading water. If psychology as a science were to move at the same rapid pace as, for example, pharmacology or IT technologies, then religion would be officially declared by psychology as something harmful to the human psyche.I am sure that in 500 years, sciences such as psychiatry and psychology will have advanced so much that we will perceive religion as a disease. A disease that we can cure. It will not be treated pharmacologically with drugs, but energetically. Experts will extract various negative energy programs from the aura and clogged chakras of Christians, which make them unfree, which have completely controlled them. After the therapy, Christians themselves will not recognize how they could believe in such absurd religious nonsense under the influence of manipulative programs.
Lack of activists to spread awareness about Christianity
Since 2012, religious decline has been enormously successful because good people are passive. If good people are inactive and ignorant Christians are very active, then logically evil will win, and evil and ignorance will have the upper hand.I am very frustrated and honestly sad that despite this page having a relatively decent viewership, I don't see any activists spreading awareness from this page further. Why are people so passive and inactive? I can't take it anymore – I'm doing everything I can on my part, but why don't other people help me? I openly call for spreading awareness on the website.
If people were as active in spreading awareness about Christianity as they are in spreading hateful propaganda of alternative media against opinion opponents, believe me, Catholic priests would start waking up and leaving the church en masse!!
After 2012, we have been receiving powerful energies from space that give me the strength to destroy Christianity by spreading awareness about it, but we are potentially ignoring and not using this energy. Why are people so decadent? Why aren't people at least a little normal? Why don't people follow at least a little common sense?
Are there any "anti-Christian activists" today? Yes, there are. These are atheistic organizations. However, various atheistic organizations are a parody and mockery of "anti-Christian" activism. Christians make fun of materialists because it is very easy to argue against materialism philosophically. Materialism is a belief against common sense – it is a primitive philosophy. Nonsense cannot be refuted by nonsense. Lies cannot be refuted by lies.
On the other hand, it must be said that materialism is energetically much less harmful from a shamanic point of view. Materialism is something neutral and harmless. That's why I'm a big fan of atheist activists and I would be very happy if religious fanatics at least switched to a materialistic belief, but unfortunately, that's hardly realistic. Arguing with materialistic philosophy is impossible.
Does religion really make a person better?
As a former fanatical Christian who grew up in a strongly religious environment, I say that religion makes a person worse. And you will be surprised, I will not slander other Christians (which Christians would probably expect most in such an argument) but I will talk directly about myself.Christianity speaks of love. However, when I was a Christian, I was able to be very vengeful and evil under certain circumstances if someone angered me. And that's without any exaggeration. Since I got rid of religion, I have been filled with love and harmony.
Although Christianity speaks of the noble thing of forgiving enemies, I have only been successful in this matter since I got rid of the heavy energies of religion.
It is also interesting that since I am not a Christian, I am not as offended when I am in contact with bad, arrogant people. Since I got rid of the energy burden of Christianity, unpleasant, arrogant people simply do not make me angry. On the contrary, I constantly hear how Christians constantly gossip about unpleasant people and complain – but I never get involved in such debates – it drains my energy.
Despite the considerable inconveniences with Christians, as I have left them, I have generally harmonious relations with them and I argue with them less often than they argue among themselves.
Furthermore, the shamanic philosophical system and shamanic meditations have taught me a lot about how humans do not have as much free will as it seems – people are strongly controlled by various energy programs, and this helps me even more to be patient and not get offended by arrogant, unpleasant people, because I understand that they are controlled by bad energy programs and are not evil of their own free will. This is another thing that helps me never take insults from unpleasant and evil people personally.
Why is it that Christianity makes a person worse despite preaching love and forgiveness ? I have also been thinking about this question for a long time. Since I was also a Christian, I can understand it. The catch is that religion lowers a person's vibrations and fills a person with bad energies, and that makes a person worse. Therefore, atheists, materialists, or people with esoteric beliefs will always be better in love and forgiveness than Christians.
Whenever a religious fanatic behaves worse in a situation than a non-religious person, this is either completely ignored by believers or attributed to "chance" or individual failure. The truth is that this is not a matter of chance but a rule. Believers themselves have never considered that religion makes them worse. This is a real and harsh reality. Unfortunately, no psychological statistical research has been done on this topic, but it would certainly confirm that religion makes a person worse, even ethically.
This is just a small example of how religious fanatics behaved significantly worse than non-religious people would have behaved in the same situation towards a mentally ill activist. Patience and Christian love really did not emanate from those people https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLVDQy884GM Religious fanatics were full of hatred . If you show such a video to a religious fanatic, they will downplay the whole situation, they will try in every way to diminish the seriousness of the situation and will only talk about the individual failure of individuals. In reality, however, religion really and authentically makes a person worse.
My personal transformation after getting rid of Christianity (continued)
After getting rid of Christianity, after I disconnected from the heavily burdensome energy field (egregor) of religion. I was born again and getting rid of religion was a very positive moment in my life.While I was burdened with the energy of religion, I was full of envy and hidden hatred, as were other Christians. The well-known healer Ján Pravda says that envy and hatred are the worst and most serious human traits. And there is a lot of hidden hatred and hidden envy among Christians.
When I was a Christian, I was an actor who pretended to love, but inwardly I had no love in me. Christians are people who, on the one hand, know how to help others selflessly (they pretend to love), but on the other hand, their thoughts are full of hatred and envy. When I was a Christian, I pretended (I played it like an actor) that there was no envy in me, but I had a lot of envy towards successful people.
Since I disconnected from the energies of religion, I don't have to pretend to be in love like an actor, but I feel, think, and radiate love internally and sincerely. And since I am not a Christian, based on connecting to the true God – the Absolute, to truly pure energies, I am filled with goodwill towards successful people (the opposite of envy) and I don't have to insincerely play it out and pretend like an actor that I don't have envy and am benevolent.
When I was a Christian, I had a trait that I was very easily offended by nasty, bad people, I felt hurt and then angry at such people. I observe the same trait in other Christians. However, after a personal transformation, when I got rid of the bad energies of Christianity, I am not offended by bad people, I do not take things so seriously. I don't have to pretend to be an actor (like many Christians) that I'm not offended, but really and honestly, nasty people don't offend me. The personal transformation after getting rid of Christianity was really great.
When I was a Christian, I was often touchy and conceited when communicating with people, I understood/interpreted things in the wrong context (although there were not always objective reasons for it). But since I got rid of Christianity, I always understand the same situations in a positive context and that really sincerely and I don't have to pretend like an actor as it is with Christians.
Can the Catholic Church reform itself?
The Catholic Church cannot be reformed because it is an organization in which the energies of the Inquisition and the energies of fear are still strong. Disagreement with religious dogmas is not possible.Let's just consider when and how the church came into being. All historians agree that the Catholic Church was, from the very beginning, an instrument of the emperor's military-police-political power. Emperor Constantine understood that he could use the church as a wonderful instrument of power, openly supporting Christianity and legally placing it on the same level as the Roman-Greek pagan religion. Emperor Theodosius banned paganism and enacted Christianity as the sole religion. Before the church emerged as a political power, individual parts of the Roman Empire were governed by prefects – high Roman officials (Pontius Pilate was such an administrator in Palestine at one time). With the introduction of Christianity, the role of prefects was replaced by bishops and cardinals as the emperor's extended arm. The Catholic Church was a strict military organization where the only task was to obey orders from above and not to ask questions. To this day, in the Catholic Church, blind obedience to a hierarchical superior in the church is spoken of as the greatest virtue (I say this as a former Christian without the slightest exaggeration).
I've digressed a bit, now I'll return to the core of the problem. In the Catholic Church, it is forbidden to have questions. In the Catholic Church, the only thing that is important is to blindly obey, to blindly follow the rules of the church. Every believer and priest has a duty to believe in the official teaching of the church, and publicly proclaiming anything else is strictly forbidden under threat of serious penalties. Officially discussing topics on my website within the church is strictly forbidden, because discussing equals being a heretic, and the church burns heretics. See the heretic priest Jan Hus, who publicly proclaimed a different opinion than the church, was burned. Similarly, the Catholic priest and heretic Martin Luther would have ended up if the local ruler had not provided him with military protection behind the walls.
Even if there was a very brave priest (which I strongly doubt) who would openly want to spread awareness in the church and open up topics on this site among priests, he would immediately be fired and would lose the economically very advantageous profession of a priest and would remain a homeless person on the street. By the way, I also heard about a homeless priest – he is a real person – church dignitaries punished him for disobedience.
While since 2012 we have seen a huge return to the decline of religion, in 1990 there were completely different energies in society. Singer Jaromír Nohavica openly mocks religious nonsense https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1SJDxBQ4qU