admin

The Pope thus clearly supported economic immigration to Europe and became the second Merkel, who openly invited immigrants to Europe. The Pope thus very clearly expressed himself in favor of a multicultural Europe. The Pope did not wash the feet of poor refugees but of speculative economic immigrants.

Today's times are very difficult, and Europe and Slovakia are going downhill in all aspects. The church is perfectly exploiting this situation of difficult and unstable times. And we see that the black magic of religious activists was really strong and effective. Kotleba's party, ĽSNS, which is the most Christian-oriented, has really succeeded.

There are also positive extraterrestrial civilizations that are trying to help us. A crop circle appeared in Slovakia several years ago, a pictogram in which a positive extraterrestrial civilization warns Slovakia about religion.

Celsus was a Greek philosopher whose work criticizing Christians was written in 177.

A certain unnamed priest wrote me the following email + my answer. I am a Catholic priest, I came across this page and I am starting to have doubts in my faith. I would also like to give up and renounce religion, I would give up the calling of a priest, but it would cause me a lot of problems.

A man who spends most of his time among the original tribal shamans also mentioned religion in the conversation. This is an excerpt from the interview. The attitude of original shamanism towards religion is strongly critical:

A clear list of articles on the entire page. Recommended

The site is about the criticism of Christianity/religion. It is intended primarily for Christians but also for (secular) non-religious people. It is an educational site whose goal is to awaken Christians to the truth. The author of the site is neither an atheist nor a "satanist", but an ethically-minded person who adheres to the philosophy of the original tribal Amazonian shamans.

The Church has always been confronted with the fact that religion comes into conflict with reason. Therefore, the modern Church of the 20th and 21st centuries tries to explain and clarify this problem – unsuccessfully, of course. Religion and faith are clearly at odds with reason. Religion is based on dogmas, and dogmas are authoritative "truths" that simply "are" "truth" and cannot be discussed.

It is a truly serious historical fact that the church built churches on the sacred sites of our ancestors. These were so-called power zones or sacred groves – tree stands to which enormous spiritual significance was attributed. Notice the paradox: on the one hand, the church considered sacred groves to be something diabolical and evil, but on the other hand, it built churches in these "diabolical" places. How to explain this paradox?