A call to the academic community: to conduct scientific research on Christianity. Church history, history of dogmas, and philosophical criticism.
The academic community is too little concerned with the history of Christianity because there are too few critical arguments against the Church. Even when a historian deals with the history of Christianity, 95% of them are only church historians who have studied two schools: theology and history, and therefore are mostly priests. However, in the Catholic Church, it is considered a sin to criticize the Church in any way; the Church must only be spoken of in a positive light. A church historian will never use scientific methods, will never be objective, will always take out of context only the positive things the church has done, and will conceal the negative.
Furthermore, many archaeological and other research projects are often financed and organized by the church itself, and although non-religious people also participate in these studies, the archaeologist in question cannot afford to be free and use objective scientific methods (e.g., research in the Holy Land).
In public, we have a very strong one-sided and non-objective view of the Church, but to be objective, we also need to hear the other opinion – the critical one.
There is scientific literature available on the market from a few historians that critically deals with controversial popes and other missteps of the Vatican, but such scientific research is only good for an introduction – it is weak – it is scientific research built on bad foundations, because the worst crimes of the church were the least publicized and awareness of them is minimal.
We all know about the Holy Inquisition or the popes who had their own brothel. But we are still only scratching the surface.
However, this website of mine is a perfect topic and inspiration for scientific research for scientists, doctoral students, students who are writing their diploma theses, and university teachers who are obliged to publish a scientific publication – a book – from time to time. Students and professors often do their diploma/scientific theses only out of obligation, but I think it is quite the opposite – it is the most beautiful thing – to engage in meaningful work such as the critique of Christianity. This website can perfectly direct the academic community to very interesting and meaningful research. Without proper guidance, it simply cannot be done.
My website is very interesting, but it is very sad that the academic community has practically not dealt with the topics on my website for many years before me. Why is this so? The catch is that Christianity and the church is a huge egregore that has an extremely strong protective energy field. A person must have an extremely large amount of energy to be able to meaningfully criticize Christianity, even with factual arguments and scientific methods.
Department of History and Archaeology
There are several proposals and directions that the academic community should take.The greatest crimes of the church occurred mainly during the process of Christianization – the Christianization of Europe. It is better to scientifically document mainly the indiscriminate methods: extermination, genocide, wars, confiscation of property from pagans (existential problem), "pagan uprisings" in our territory and other Slavic countries. It must be realized that for pagan nations, Christianity was something dark and demonic, the worship of blood and a dead body. No nation accepted Christianity voluntarily.
it would be a great step forward if scientific research were to conclude that Christianity was not something people longed for – questioning Christianity from the ground up
to better document how and when power passed from the emperor to the pope
to deal more with the overall decline in the Middle Ages in Europe, which occurred after Christianization, to put these things more in context, to document it better
to further correlate the decline of Christianity with health and height based on skeletons and dental health
not to assume that people of all ancient cultures had short lives and poor health
Success would be to get into the Vatican Libraries as a researcher and thus obtain much communication between the Pope and the rulers who murdered for the purpose of Christianization. The Pope's orders for extermination.
to deal with Greek and Roman philosophers and their critical arguments against Christians when Christianity had not yet gained political power
to better document the Gnostics, Gnostic Christianity, and its enormously expansive spread without violence. The extermination of the Gnostics
One field, law, history of law
Law theses don't have to be so boring. Researching legislation, laws in Rome, Greece after the introduction of Christianity, and the persecution of non-Christians can be an interesting topic.Philosophy, history of dogmas, history and development of Christian theological teaching
These are things that challenge Christianity at its very foundations: the manipulation of the Bible in connection with the Holy Trinity, the Bible does not speak of Christ as God but on the contrary, pagan authors describe the first Christians as polytheists, the polytheistic Council of Nicaea, to better document the polytheistic nature of Christianity, which is contrary to the teaching of the Holy Trinity.Christians do not realize that their faith is at most 700 years old and has absolutely nothing to do with Christ's teachings.
to find things in the Vatican archives that call into question the teaching of the Church
to discuss the early Christian theologians recognized by the Catholic Church, who had a different view of the Divinity of Christ and the Holy Trinity than the official teaching of the Church – I am convinced that there would be plenty to find
Management
It is not only important to be a good scientist, but also a good organizer and manager.Where to get money: If you have a doctorate, you can apply for a job as a research scientist at the Slovak Academy of Sciences and you will be paid for your work.
financing / sponsoring of popular science literature or other educational activities: it is possible to ask various foundations for money
It is not enough to be a scientist, but also a popularizer.
Annex
This scientific study is 100% true and confirms my personal experience. It is indeed true that Christians have many social events and associate with each other. They are also strongly civically and politically active. Let's take Slovakia, for example: politics is more Christian than the average population, Christians are very assertive in politics. Let's consider the power of Christian activists, the 2015 referendum of the Alliance for the Family against homosexuals, the media-influential priest Marián Kuffa, demonstrations against the Istanbul Convention, Christian marches for life and for the family. Esoteric communities of people do not unite at all, these people do not meet, do not have social events, and do not publicly present their political opinion on reducing the influence of the church.It is really true that if you ask a religious person if they are happy, everyone will tell you that they are doing great, but there is one catch. Christians lie to themselves and their typical characteristic is that they are insincere to themselves and others, and I was like that when I was a Christian. Objective research would be if non-Christians evaluated Christians and to what extent they consider them happy – then the research would turn out exactly the opposite.
While a Christian cowardly flees from reality into the mental world of religion, having it as a substitute for a drug, a non-religious person faces problems and reality head-on and solves problems harshly and directly, which is why they are seemingly less happy.
Believers are happier than atheists, they are more socially engaged https://www.tyden.cz/rubriky/veda/clovek/verici-jsou-stastnejsi-nez-ateiste-spolecensky-se-vice-angazuji_512965.html