As I have already mentioned, many Christian dogmas are also in conflict with the Bible. The Bible does not describe Jesus in such an idealistic way and does not consider him to be God. The Bible speaks about Jesus. But who can guarantee us that the Bible tells the truth? Are there any other independent sources that confirm the Bible? Was Jesus really as important as he is said to be? Did he really perform such great miracles? Well, the truth is that the only authentic writings about Jesus, apart from the Bible, are Gnostic. And the Gnostics certainly did not consider Jesus to be God and do not speak of any miracles of his. Gnostic writings describe Jesus only as a spiritual teacher. Roman and Greek writers wrote history in great detail. The territory of Palestine was under the political power of Rome. But there are no known historical writings that Jesus was particularly important. If Jesus had really performed such miracles as are written about him in the Bible, then surely some historians would have written at least something about him, that he was a great mystic who performed great wonders, but we see that they wrote nothing. From this we can clearly conclude that the Bible is lying. The crucifixion of Jesus was not the highest act of God's grace of redemption. But it was a real fall, defeat and accident of Jesus, but this failure and embarrassment were tried to be covered up by Jesus' followers, that it was all intentional and "within the game".
A possible theory about Jesus: There is also a possibility that Jesus was overcome by the forces of evil. I realize how strong the forces of darkness are now, and in the past, the forces of darkness were no weaker than they are today. The crucifixion of Jesus simply meant nothing other than his defeat by the forces of evil. It was not only a physical but also a spiritual defeat for Jesus.